Intel Outs New 9th Gen Processors: Seven New Models

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • charleyed
    You wrote: "Intel also brought its new Core i5-9500 to bear", but your chart shows a Core i5-9400.
    Reply
  • Zlatko Flajpan
    Intel is so lost and now the table overturn in the favor of AMD.Intel now must disable gpu in the APU to compete in power consumption with AMD.That movie we seen couple years ago but the sides are being diffrent.
    Reply
  • rantoc
    @ZLATKO FLAJPAN: More likely they recycle chips with failed gpu's, they can't even keep up with their 14nm demand so its a logical step. One that should been made along time ago considering many who buys those chips attach an discrete gpu anyway. Why pay extra for something that just wastes silicon space
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    I suspect that there will be be little price difference with the KF chips but they may be available when the IGP chips are not.

    "What's the most important CPU ability when building a machine"? = Availability
    Reply
  • Olle P
    21655771 said:
    ... Intel now must disable gpu in the APU to compete in power consumption with AMD.
    21655901 said:
    More likely they recycle chips with failed gpu's, they can't even keep up with their 14nm demand so its a logical step. One that should been made along time ago considering many who buys those chips attach an discrete gpu anyway. Why pay extra for something that just wastes silicon space
    I Think you're both correct, but power consumption is less of an issue (as seen in previous reviews where the TDP is a very limiting factor even when the iGPU isn't used). Disabling the iGPU makes effectively no difference.

    21655953 said:
    I suspect that there will be be little price difference with the KF chips but they may be available when the IGP chips are not.
    Availability will be the selling point. The release MSRP could be lower than the counterparts with iGPUs, but actual pricing will depend more on demand and fighting what AMD has to offer.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    21655680 said:
    You wrote: "Intel also brought its new Core i5-9500 to bear", but your chart shows a Core i5-9400.
    He also wrote
    that jumps up to 4.1 GHz on a single core
    Although turbo behavior has changed 2 generations ago.
    https://www.intel.com.tr/content/www/tr/tr/support/articles/000005647/processors.html
    Up to the 7th gen we had pre determined single core boosts, after that turbo just boosts as many cores as far as possible without any specific numbers, it should read 4.1 on AT LEAST one core since that is guaranteed.

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/turbo-boost/turbo-boost-technology.html
    Processors with the same model number running under the same operating conditions may see some frequency or power variance. This is a natural characteristic of silicon driven by variances in voltages, power and leakage during the production process. Contact your local Intel sales office or your distributor to obtain the latest specifications.
    Reply
  • Marlin Schwanke
    Chart shows Core i9-9700K, think it’s supposed to be i7-9700K.
    Reply
  • charleyed
    Marlin, you are right and I missed that when I was looking for errors. It is shown as 8 cores and 8 threads and that is correct for an i7-9700, etc, processor.
    Reply
  • valeman2012
    https://ark.intel.com/products/190883/Intel-Core-i5-9400F-Processor-9M-Cache-up-to-4-10-GHz-
    i5 9400F recommended price is $182
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    Intel's 9th gen lineup appears disappointing in contrast to AMD's 3rd gen Ryzen. AMD's core count increase is impressive. Intel appears to just be doing a rehash of last generation. =/
    Reply