JuiShark M.2 SSD Cooler is Taller Than a Low-Profile GPU

JuiShark M.2 Four SSD cooler
(Image credit: JuiShark)

China’s JuiShark has launched another audacious M.2 SSD cooler. The latest model, dubbed the M.2 Four, is the logical successor to last year’s M.2 Three. Surprisingly, this bold company has shrunk the design down a little with this latest generation. However, it is still huge in the world of SSD coolers at 71mm tall, several millimeters taller than a standard modern low-profile graphics card. In addition, making up for its physical shrink, the M.2 Four is bolder than ever, with a choice of three colors and an aRGB fan.

Perhaps the JuiShark M.2 Four has been made a little more compact by adopting a  design tailored for the moderate M.2 heat load. Last year’s model looked a lot like half a tower-style CPU cooler, but with the M.2 Four design, we see something a little more sophisticated, with a custom heatsink fitting snugly into a 2280-sized tray and an aRGB fan completely recessed within the finned structure.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • tennis2
    I just worry about the stress a cooler that large puts on the M.2 connector. Certainly would want to remove the SSD if transporting.
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    tennis2 said:
    I just worry about the stress a cooler that large puts on the M.2 connector. Certainly would want to remove the SSD if transporting.
    The m.2 screw post is going to help anchor this in place and those m.2 connectors are beefy, 67-75 pin connections... it ain't going anywhere. PCB of the m.2 is the weakest link.

    Not sure its a needed solution, but perhaps PCIE gen 5 drives will prove me wrong. I have the old ekwb m.2 heatsink, I have it on an optane 118gb drive... I got it for free when buying a 32gb optane off ebay but I am not convinced it is providing any benefit.
    Reply