Samsung's New Monitor Can't Decide If It's for Gaming or Business

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Wes006
    Jack of all trades, master of none, but oftentimes better than master of one.
    Reply
  • why_wolf
    strange that they didn't add Freesync for a monitor in that price category.
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    21157180 said:
    strange that they didn't add Freesync for a monitor in that price category.

    Given it's on the fence between the two categories, I'm not too surprised to see it doesn't include FS but it does, at least, have a workable refresh rate. If it did include FS, I wonder how much it would have elevated the cost by comparison?
    Reply
  • AgentLozen
    Isn't FreeSync baked into the VESA Displayport standard? I thought it was free to implement.
    Reply
  • grimfox
    There isn't a licensing fee for Freesync like there is for Gsync. So that doesn't add to the cost. But you do need a different screen controller that is capable of variable refresh. Which does add to the cost. The upgraded controller probably costs 20% more than a regular controller. Which is only a marginal cost compared to the screen itself thus you don't see a massive markup for Freesync like you do for Gsync. I think that down the line as we move into newer versions of Displayport as the standard Freesync will be available on all monitors with DP connections. It will actually be free at that point.
    Reply
  • darkomaledictus
    Its looking like no hdr, will have to keep waiting for acer and asus Ultra wide HDR solutions coming by the end of the year.
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    21158519 said:
    There isn't a licensing fee for Freesync like there is for Gsync. So that doesn't add to the cost. But you do need a different screen controller that is capable of variable refresh. Which does add to the cost. The upgraded controller probably costs 20% more than a regular controller. Which is only a marginal cost compared to the screen itself thus you don't see a massive markup for Freesync like you do for Gsync. I think that down the line as we move into newer versions of Displayport as the standard Freesync will be available on all monitors with DP connections. It will actually be free at that point.

    I'm fully aware there isn't a licensing fee associated with FS as there is with GS; however, there may be some difference in terms of hardware to allow for adaptive sync and thus my question. I can't imagine there being much of a cost differential if there is one. It was just more of wondering aloud than anything else.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    You would have to be crazy to try to do office work on an ultrawide monitor.
    Dealing with text and documentation is all about vertical space, not width.

    I mean, I'm sure it's fine for the occasional homework assignment or reading an occasional website at home, but I would go nuts trying to use something like this for 8 hours a day.
    Reply
  • dseckard1
    I use 2 1920 by 1200 24" monitors now for working from home. This would take less space and eliminate the vertical bar. And my desktop resolution would be what it is now. One of the current monitors blanks once in a while so need replacements soon. Hmmm.

    For work, code on one side, what it is doing on the other side. And say, three windows side by side, something I don't do now due to vertical bar.
    Reply
  • Tanquen
    Curved is a gimmick and not for business.
    Super ultra wide may be of interest for gamers even then it's still pretty much just a gimmick and it's cheaper for them to make.
    I guess we're just never going to see a good 16 x 10 monitor again. Been waiting for ages to buy a good 4k monitor that's 16 by 9 or 16 x 10 and flat!
    Reply