Sausage-Style GPU Thermal Paste Application Results in Lowest Temps

Igor's Lab tested re-pasted GPU cooling
(Image credit: Igor's Lab)
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • -Fran-
    Sausage camp, represent!

    Er... Yeah...

    Regards :D
    Reply
  • DougMcC
    If you're going to work the attachment side to side, sure, vertical application is obviously going to spread the best. I'd place a heavy bet on multiple vertical lines being even better in such a strategy. Does anyone think the end-goal is anything other than a fairly smooth distribution over the surface of the chip?
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    Doesn't look much like any sausage I've ever eaten ...
    Reply
  • jp7189
    DougMcC said:
    If you're going to work the attachment side to side, sure, vertical application is obviously going to spread the best. I'd place a heavy bet on multiple vertical lines being even better in such a strategy. Does anyone think the end-goal is anything other than a fairly smooth distribution over the surface of the chip?
    I'd be worried about trapped air pockets. I think the X style is about as far as I would go with multiple lines.
    Reply
  • Kurdain1
    This likely depends heavily on the tile layout under the heat spreader.
    We use very large GPUs with multiple tiles in a single package for very high performance compute where each GPU is tuned to a different frequency for maximum performance where even a couple degrees variant makes a large difference.
    3"x2.5" large tiles, 6 GPUs, copper water blocks, and in stress and performance validations a stunted X pattern seemed to perform best in our case. This is being replicated across ~10,000 nodes now so pretty confident.

    It'd be interesting to see different methods vs. different GPU brands and architectures, I bet it will vary.
    Reply
  • Phaaze88
    Whoa, even the wildly popular MX-4 got dismissed? It does fine if one isn't min-maxing though.

    I use the 5 dot with NT-H2, but I'm using a Kraken G12 and securing the 4 screws diagonally. Works well enough with the 5 dot.


    Admin said:
    News Sausage-Style GPU Thermal Paste Application Results in Lowset Temps

    Igor's Lab ran tests on a GeForce RTX 3080 with a liquid cooler to test various thermal paste application techniques.

    Sausage-Style GPU Thermal Paste Application Results in Lowset Temps : Read more
    'Lowset'?
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Phaaze88 said:
    Whoa, even the wildly popular MX-4 got dismissed? It does fine if one isn't min-maxing though.

    I use the 5 dot with NT-H2, but I'm using a Kraken G12 and securing the 4 screws diagonally. Works well enough with the 5 dot.



    'Lowset'?
    Artic MX-4 isn't the absolute best performing TIM, but it has one of the longest lasting TIM performance & isn't Electrically Conductive.
    A 8 year operation life is pretty damn good IMO. Something other manufacturers haven't seem to match.

    Here's my research on what performs (BEST -> WORST).
    There are ALOT of Caveats for some of the (BEST performing TIM's).

    If you can get your hands on the Alpenföhn PermaFrost 2 from Germany, it functions better than Arctic Cooling MX-5 & MX-4.
    It's the one TIM that I REALLY want to get my hands on and it doesn't have any 'Caveats' to using it.
    But it only has a Rated Longevity of 5 years instead of 8.

    The other higher performing TIM each have "Caveats" to using them, some more severe than others.
    Some are superficial and if you can get past "Superficial issues", you should use it.
    Reply
  • Phaaze88
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    Artic MX-4 isn't the absolute best performing TIM, but it has one of the longest lasting TIM performance & isn't Electrically Conductive.
    A 8 year operation life is pretty damn good IMO. Something other manufacturers haven't seem to match.

    Here's my research on what performs (BEST -> WORST).
    There are ALOT of Caveats for some of the (BEST performing TIM's).

    If you can get your hands on the Alpenföhn PermaFrost 2 from Germany, it functions better than Arctic Cooling MX-5 & MX-4.
    It's the one TIM that I REALLY want to get my hands on and it doesn't have any 'Caveats' to using it.
    But it only has a Rated Longevity of 5 years instead of 8.

    The other higher performing TIM each have "Caveats" to using them, some more severe than others.
    Some are superficial and if you can get past "Superficial issues", you should use it.
    Longevity isn't that important for everyone; some take their coolers apart too often for that to matter. It is more relevant for gpu waterblocks though.
    Air cooled cards, on the other hand, taking the card apart for a deeper clean should be done at least at the end of warranty, and 8 years is too long for that, making it a gimmick, IMO.
    Reply
  • SyCoREAPER
    Until next month when it's found to not be as good as we thought.

    Just like the food world, one week it's the best thing for you, next month it causes cancer.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    Phaaze88 said:
    Longevity isn't that important for everyone; some take their coolers apart too often for that to matter. It is more relevant for gpu waterblocks though.
    Air cooled cards, on the other hand, taking the card apart for a deeper clean should be done at least at the end of warranty, and 8 years is too long for that, making it a gimmick, IMO.
    Depends on the person, I know people who don't take apart their PC's or clean their PC's for > 5 years.

    So it really depends on your situation.
    Reply