We’ve had a lot of fun ramping up audience interaction here on Tom’s Hardware—from the contests (it seems like there is always at least one running) to the forums-driven Best Configs section going live this week to the comments and emails we get from every single story that gets published. Keep it coming—and we’ll do the same.
In the meantime, we’re working on our benchmark suites for 2011 (yes, there will be several) and want your input each step of the way.
Currently, I think we have a reasonable mix of gaming-, productivity-, media-, and synthetic-based tests in our automated CPU software package. But it’s hard to know if we’re giving you the performance results you most want to see in the software you most commonly use unless you speak up and let us know.
Now, keep in mind that we’d prefer to use free/trial/open source software, making reproducibility an option for as many of our readers as possible. If it turns out we’re able to lean heavily on widely available titles, it might even be possible to make the suite downloadable, allowing you to run the same tests we run for quick and easy comparison. Understandably, benchmarks that still require a license probably won’t be part of that package.
Here’s our current list of metrics:
- Apple iTunes 10.0.1
- TMPG 4.7 with DivX 6.9.2 and Xvid 1.2.2
- MainConcept Reference 2.0
- HandBrake 0.9.4
- Autodesk 3ds Max 2010
- WinRAR 3.92
- 7-Zip 4.65
- Adobe Photoshop CS5
- AVG Anti-Virus 11.0
- 3DMark Vantage
- PCMark Vantage
- SiSoftware Sandra 2010
- Metro 2033
- Just Cause 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
- DiRT 2
Occasionally you’ll see us swap out a game, exclude AVG, or add something like Fritz, but that’s the lineup I’m using as of…well, now. So, give us some suggestions on what you’d like to see in 2011. Bear in mind that the apps we use will likely be the ones most applicable to the largest number of people, though there is room for a handful of more fringe tests, too.
As we revamp other aspects of testing—from graphics card measurements to workstation and mobile suites, I’ll ask for your input first, as our team in Germany sets out to automate as much of what we do as possible.
Thanks again for the input. I’ll be stopping by the comments section here, of course. And if you want to reach me directly, I swear I’m trying to get better about interacting with Twitter. I’m even planning to give away some hardware there...
Managing Editor, Tom’s Hardware
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
How about AVIDemux?Reply
Personally, as old as it is, I'd still like to see Crysis show up on benchmarks. Although, it's fairly GPU limited, so it may be better suited for GPU benchmarks.Reply
It's still one of the more challenging games to run on even a modern rig...
The software lineup is looking great, the only thing I can think of is to include a very CPU limited game in test, the one that comes to mind is Supreme Commander Forged Alliance. This is a somewhat older game unfortunately, so maybe you know some other game to use instead. With CPU tests the testers almost always use medium resolutions/quality for games to make the test CPU limited instead of GPU limited. However often other limits are reached that cap the FPS then pure CPU power and we see benchmarks were even the budget CPU's hit 60FPS which makes that benchmark not so interesting as it tells you that for that game CPU doesn't really matter, so I would like to see games in CPU test that really struggle to get mote then 60FPS with medium to high end CPU's so that the results really mean something in real life. Now the best way to do that would be to get some very CPU dependent games and second to step up the resolution and graphics quality of the game. This would probably not say much about the real CPU power difference between the CPU's (but we have other tests for that) But it would tell what CPU you really need to get a playable framerate.Reply
I would like to see Civilization 5 used as a benchmark. The late game can really test a CPU. As an added bonus you could run the same save game file to equalize the tests of different systems and use the time between turns as the test.Reply
In the late game 2000AD+ I usually run about 30 seconds between turns but i've heard people reaching 2 minutes and over.
I would recommand more kind of new ways of juging processors, like with an ecofriendly note and a price/performance score for video and for games.Reply
Good to see CS5 in there as CS4 was really limited on multiple cores. I'd like to see one or two of the more popular DC apps as there are a lot of people who buy with that in mind - personally I'd really like to see Rosetta@home performance in there. You'd need to be a bit clever to run the same unit each time, but it's possible.Reply
Bad Company 2.Reply
I'm tired of all the whiners with dual-cores complaining about bad performance in that game.
as we always say "Can it play Crysis"
Definitely Starcraft 2Reply