AMD unveils EPYC 4004 CPUs: AM5 gets server-grade processors

AMD
(Image credit: AMD)
14

AMD introduced its EPYC 4004-series processors aimed at entry-level single socket servers designed for dedicated hosting and small businesses. The new EPYC 4004-series CPUs feature up to 16 cores and use AM5 packaging, providing a cost-effective platform that supports essential enterprise-grade capabilities.

AMD's EPYC 4004 processors are essentially Ryzen 7000-series CPUs with four, six, eight, 12 or 16 cores, up to 5.70 GHz boost clocks, up to 64 MB L3 cache, and up to 28 PCIe Gen5 lanes. The EPYC chips support up to 192 GB of DDR5-5200 memory with ECC. The platform features RAIDXpert2 for servers, AMD secure processor enclave, and transparent memory encryption (TSME). The EPYC 4004 lineup includes eight models with TDPs of 65W–170W. 

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 - Cell 0 Cores L3 Cache (MB) TDP Base Frequency Boost Frequency Price
EPYC 4564P 16 64 170W 4.5 GHz 5.7 GHz $699
EPYC 4464P 12 64 65W 3.7 GHz 5.4 GHz $429
EPYC 4364P 8 32 105W 4.5 GHz 5.4 GHz $399
EPYC 4344P 8 32 65W 3.8 GHz 5.3 GHz $329
EPYC 4244P 6 32 65W 3.8GhZ 5.1 GHz $229
EPYC 4124P 4 16 65W 3.8GhZ 5.1 GHz $149
EPYC 4584PX 16 128 120W 4.2 GHz 5.7 GHz $699
EPYC 4484PX 12 128 120W 4.4 GHz 5.6 GHz $599
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • usertests
    Wouldn't it be nice if ECC was standard (even if memory prices have to be jacked up ~15%) and not a confusing enterprise feature? No, not the DDR5 pseudo-ECC.

    Other than that, I guess these are the enterprise features:
    The platform features RAIDXpert2 for servers, AMD secure processor enclave, and transparent memory encryption (TSME).

    Pricing looks very reasonable compared to the Zen 4 desktop lineup, for carrying the Epyc name. EPYC 4124P looks like it's based on an APU die with half the L3 cache.
    Reply
  • One odd thing I noticed is that both the top two SKUs cost the same: EPYC 4564P and EPYC 4584PX costing $699 respectively !

    One is the 3D V-Cache variant with 128MB cache, and the other one is obviously the vanilla SKU.
    Reply
  • It's nice to see AMD also showcased a Cryptography and Cryptocurrency "CPU Mining" performance slide as well.

    EPYC 4004 CPUs appear to offer a 2.4x performance per $ gain, and 60% better efficiency.

    https://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/AMD-EPYC-4004-AM5-Desktop-CPUs-Official-_14.png
    Reply
  • cleavet
    These should outperform Intel's 4004 by a decent margin, especially in floating-point operations.
    Reply
  • You mean to say the Xeon E-2400 CPU lineup ? How does that ancient 4-bit 4004 processor compare with this series ?
    Reply
  • helper800
    Metal Messiah. said:
    How does that ancient 4-bit 4004 processor compare with this series ?
    I would say, very well.
    Reply
  • LabRat 891
    There's but one, incredibly important question:

    Can we OC 'em?
    Reply
  • usertests
    Metal Messiah. said:
    One odd thing I noticed is that both the top two SKUs cost the same: EPYC 4564P and EPYC 4584PX costing $699 respectively !

    One is the 3D V-Cache variant with 128MB cache, and the other one is obviously the vanilla SKU.
    That's amusing. Some (many?) customers will definitely prefer the vanilla one with higher clocks, and may have no applications at all that benefit from 3D V-Cache. So AMD might as well charge the same and see if they can get away with it.

    Too bad AMD didn't take the opportunity to launch a dual cache model (192 MB total L3).

    LabRat 891 said:
    There's but one, incredibly important question:

    Can we OC 'em?
    I don't know, but who needs it? These are clocked just as high as the identical Ryzen chips out of the box, which is unusually high for Epyc, and hitting up to 5.7 GHz which is still crazy to think about.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/21406/one-more-epyc-amd-launches-entrylevel-zen-4based-epyc-4004-series
    This does mean that, by EPYC server standards, the 4004 series is not particularly energy efficient. This is a lineup that is intended to be cost-effective first and foremost. Instead, energy efficiency remains the domain of the EPYC 8004, with its modestly-clocked many-core Zen4c designs.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    usertests said:
    I don't know, but who needs it? These are clocked just as high as the identical Ryzen chips out of the box, which is unusually high for Epyc, and hitting up to 5.7 GHz which is still crazy to think about.
    Because they are the same ryzen chips, there is no way AMD paid for the same validation as for actual epyc but then sells them so cheaply.
    They just added the I/O ,ecc mem, and whatnot to a normal ryzen package.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    TerryLaze said:
    Because they are the same ryzen chips, there is no way AMD paid for the same validation as for actual epyc but then sells them so cheaply.
    They just added the I/O ,ecc mem, and whatnot to a normal ryzen package.
    Doing what you say is a great way to kill the Epyc brand-name. From AMDs PDF about the release "By choosing the established EPYC brand for enterprises, you can be confident in using the EPYC 4004 Series as the foundation for your
    growing business, hosting facility, or server appliance development. You can choose from a variety of solutions from key system vendors
    with a multi-year CPU lifecycle support from AMD. We engage with our partners with server design and BMC validation, software RAID,
    and chipset support. We’ve tested and validated the EPYC 4004 Series with the leading server operating systems, including Microsoft
    Windows® Server 2022, Red Hat® Enterprise Linux 9.3 and 9.4, SUSE® Linux® Enterprise Server 15 SP5, and Ubuntu® 22.04"
    https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/products/epyc/amd-epyc-4004-processor-datasheet.pdf
    Reply