RISC-V CPU demoed with RX 7900 XTX GPU in Debian Linux — AMD flagship GPU paired with Milk-V Megrez board and SiFive P550 cores
The 7900 XTX was able to run the glmark2 benchmark.

RISC-V firm Milk-V demonstrated that it can get AMD’s RX 7900 XTX graphics card to work on one of its RISC-V boards.
The PC shown in the video uses Milk-V’s Megrez board, which is equipped with Chinese RISC-V chip maker Eswin’s EIC7700X, a system-on-chip (SoC) that hosts four P550 CPU cores designed by SiFive. The P550 core has been around since 2021, so it’s nothing cutting-edge at the tail end of 2024. The SoC sport H.265 encoding and decoding at 8K, and has a 20 TOPS NPU, which are both reasonably robust for PCs.
The particular 7900 XTX that Milk-V used was made by XFX and ran on Debian Linux. There wasn’t much choice in terms of the OS, as Linux boasts the best support for RISC-V at the moment. The brief demo showed the system running the glmark2 benchmark, which renders 3D objects at the highest framerate possible.
However, Milk-V got a 7900 XTX up and running on this RISC-V board, which marks another milestone for RISC-V’s ambitions in PCs. So far, the open-standard architecture has been primarily used for data centers, AI, and tiny, low-function chips that form just one small part of a whole product. Although the usage of RISC-V has been growing steadily for the last few years, the architecture hasn’t penetrated the PC market, the domain of x86, and now Arm.
Milk-V Megrez running AMD 7900XTXQuad core SiFive P550, 19.95TOPS NPU#riscv #RISCVSummit pic.twitter.com/xSuTLjcIqOOctober 24, 2024
A few RISC-V laptops have made it to market, such as DeepComputing’s DC-ROMA and the Lichee Console 4A, but you could count them all on one or maybe two hands. No fully assembled RISC-V-powered desktop exists, but some motherboards come with RISC-V chips, such as those made by Milk-V.
Although no RISC-V CPU is in a position to realistically take advantage of support for AMD’s flagship gaming CPU, the support’s existence certainly won’t hurt. It will undoubtedly be difficult for RISC-V to make inroads into the PC ecosystem if Arm’s example is anything to judge by. Arm chip designer Qualcomm struggled for years to make its Snapdragon laptops an appealing choice until this year with the Snapdragon X Elite. Estimates show Arm CPUs will power as much as 40% of notebooks sold in 2029.
It is important to note that Arm has the full support of Microsoft, which is crucial for Arm’s success in PCs since Windows is the most important OS for consumer desktops and laptops. Getting supported on Windows will probably be essential for RISC-V’s adoption in the PC market. Otherwise, RISC-V companies will have to bet on Windows getting serious competition from Linux or some other OS, which doesn’t seem likely to happen any time soon.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Matthew Connatser is a freelancing writer for Tom's Hardware US. He writes articles about CPUs, GPUs, SSDs, and computers in general.
-
brucehoult > The P550 core has been around since 2021, so it’s nothing cutting-edge at the tail end of 2024.Reply
What a stupid comment! Announced in June 2021, the P550 is the newest and most powerful RISC-V CPU core available in a product you can buy today.
Of course we are hoping that the P670, announced 1 November 2022, will make it into something you can buy in the next 6 to 12 months, though Sophgo's SG2380 has reportedly hit sanctions-related snags.
Three to four years from announcement of a core until its availability in cheap SBCs is the normal standard.
That's how long the A53 took to get into the Pi 3 and Odroid C2. That's how long the A72 took to get into the Pi 4. That's how long the A76 took to get into the Rock 5. That's how long the U74 and C910 took to get into the VisionFive 2 and LicheePi 4A (JH7110 and TH1520 SoCs), both released in 2023.
Limited volume and more expensive manufacturer's dev boards can be available a year or two earlier, using "shuttle run" (MPW) test chips. -
erazog Windows is not a requirement for mainstream adoption. The Steam Deck though targeting a specific market is proof of that. There are also Linux PC makers likes Tuxedo and System76.Reply
The problem is that most of the Linux distros are far too nerdy for mainstream users, even Ubuntu which brands itself as Linux for regular people. The distros which try to be more friendly have no corporate backing so aren't a popular choice to ship on a system out of the box.
PC makers want a company that does support/testing etc. which is why Valve, Tuxedo etc all have their own inhouse distro, that's the main problem with Linux distros, there is no equivalent to Microsoft the company.
RISC-V is quite different from x86/Arm even if Windows was running on it without native software the performance could be terrible, the developer of Linux translation layer FEX-Emu has mentioned that x86 does not map well to RISC-V. -
bit_user
The main point is for it to support any dGPU, as the one incorporated in the SoC is likely Imagination and the state of their drivers usually isn't good.The article said:Although no RISC-V CPU is in a position to realistically take advantage of support for AMD’s flagship gaming CPU, the support’s existence certainly won’t hurt.
The fact that they demonstrated it with a flagship dGPU was probably just to grab headlines. Real world developers are more likely to use something cheap and low power, like a RX 6400.
SoC specs:
https://www.cnx-software.com/2024/06/19/eswin-eic7700x-quad-core-risc-v-soc-embeds-19-95-tops-npu-for-edge-ai-vision-applications/ https://www.eswincomputing.com/en/bocupload/2024/06/19/17187920991529ene8q.pdf
As far as boards go, I'd rather have one of these (which uses the same SoC):
https://www.sifive.com/boards/hifive-premier-p550
It's interesting that they stipulate an AMD dGPU is required for display output, apparently confirming the iGPU isn't properly supported. -
bit_user
Yeah, I think first class Android and ChromeOS support will be more consequential.erazog said:Windows is not a requirement for mainstream adoption.