RTX 5080 is 22% faster than the RTX 4080 per leaked benchmarks — falls short of the RTX 4090
At least it costs the same as its predecessor.

RTX 5090 reviews are finally live, and the performance aligns with previously leaked benchmarks. The RTX 5080 is next in line and has been tested in Geekbench (via Benchleaks) across the OpenCL and Vulkan APIs, likely by a reviewer who inadvertently made the data public. The benchmarks suggest an up to 22% performance uplift over its Lovelace counterpart, which isn't that exciting, but as always, take this leak with a grain of salt. Synthetic tests may not accurately reflect how the GPU will perform in real-world scenarios.
The system was equipped with the fastest gaming processor on earth, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, for both tests. It packs eight cores and sixteen threads built using AMD's Zen 5 architecture and features a large 64MB SRAM chiplet atop the CCD for 104MB of total L2+L3 cache. The CPU was slotted in MSI's latest MPG 850 Edge Ti WiFi motherboard alongside 32GB of DDR5-6000 memory. We've gathered publicly available data at Geekbench's OpenCL and Vulkan repository in a table for comparison.
The RTX 5080 scored 261,836 and 256,138 points across the Vulkan and OpenCL APIs, respectively. An interesting fact we noticed is that Blackwell GPUs offer better performance in Vulkan than OpenCL. With that in mind, the RTX 5080 lands 22% faster than the RTX 4080 in Vulkan. This lead drops to just 6%, switching the API to OpenCL. Traditionally, 80-class GPUs have beaten 90-class GPUs from the prior generation. Sadly, that seems to be no longer the case since the RTX 5080 trails the RTX 4090 by as much as 19%. Again, we're just looking at synthetic performance, so don't read too much into these numbers.
GPU Name | OpenCL Score | Vulkan Score | % vs RTX 5080 (OpenCL) | % vs RTX 5080 (Vulkan) |
---|---|---|---|---|
RTX 5090 | 373463 | 366095 | 145.81% | 139.82% |
RTX 4090 | 317436 | 267112 | 123.93% | 102.02% |
RTX 5080 | 256138 | 261836 | 100.00% | 100.00% |
RTX 4080 Super | 247399 | 221908 | 96.59% | 84.75% |
RTX 4080 | 239859 | 214538 | 93.64% | 81.94% |
The RTX 5080 employs the GB203 die and features 10,752 cores (84 Streaming Multiprocessors), less than half the core count of the RTX 5090. It also offers 16GB of GDDR7 memory, the same as the RTX 4080. The 256-bit interface enables eight VRAM modules, which could have allowed for 24GB of memory had Nvidia opted for 24Gb (8GB) VRAM chips, like the RTX 5090 laptop.
Shipping manifests suggest Nvidia is working on a 96GB RTX Blackwell workstation GPU, likely using 32 24Gb modules in a clamshell configuration. Still, we won't hear much about higher memory capacities until a possible RTX 50 Super refresh, but even that notion is far-fetched for market segmentation reasons. The RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 will hit shelves starting January 30. However, supply chain issues could limit initial availability and leave you at the mercy of scalpers.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
artk2219 With half the die being wasted, I really wonder if it wasn't a better idea to have a separate tape out, either that or the yields are horrendous enough to make it worth it.Reply -
Eximo Just looking at the core count and such it was clear it is an updated replacement for the 4080/4080 Super, not intended as an improvement. They want that massive gap between the 5080 and 5090.Reply
You might convince me to get a 5070 Ti at this point. But the value add for the extra money seems minimal. Just like the 4080 at launch. -
TheyStoppedit The 50 series is just a 40 series refresh. Everybody already knows this.Reply
The 5080 is really the 4080Ti
The 5070Ti is what the 4080S should have been
The 5070 is what the 4070Ti Super should be
My message to NVidia is this: You give me fake frames, I'll give you fake dollars. The 5090 is 3x price what I can get a 4080S for. Here in Canada, a 5090 will be 3500 Canadian pesos minimum, on the absolute bottom end. I can get a 4080S used for 1200. I would have 60% of 5090 performance for 30% of the price. I can get a 4090 for 1800 CAD easy, and I would have 75% of the performance while only using 70% of the the 5090s power consumption for 50% of the 5090 price.
Bottom line is: The 50 series can only appeal to those who are willing to pay real dollars for fake frames. I'm not one of them and I know most others arent either. I'm sure 60 series will do 6 fake frames instead of just 3 or 4 and they will be like "Oh look, 5090 performance in a 6060 for only $700 USD." Sorry, not happening. I want to be wrong but I'm not holding out much hope -
Jame5 AMD's Zen 5 architecture and features a large 64MB SRAM chiplet atop the CCD for 104MB of total L2+L3 cache
Underneath, not atop. That's half the reason these CPU's do as well as they do. The CCD isn't being smothered by the extra L3 cache. -
aero1x
damn you complain a lotTheyStoppedit said:The 50 series is just a 40 series refresh. Everybody already knows this.
The 5080 is really the 4080Ti
The 5070Ti is what the 4080S should have been
The 5070 is what the 4070Ti Super should be
My message to NVidia is this: You give me fake frames, I'll give you fake dollars. The 5090 is 3x price what I can get a 4080S for. Here in Canada, a 5090 will be 3500 Canadian pesos minimum, on the absolute bottom end. I can get a 4080S used for 1200. I would have 60% of 5090 performance for 30% of the price. I can get a 4090 for 1800 CAD easy, and I would have 75% of the performance while only using 70% of the the 5090s power consumption for 50% of the 5090 price.
Bottom line is: The 50 series can only appeal to those who are willing to pay real dollars for fake frames. I'm not one of them and I know most others arent either. I'm sure 60 series will do 6 fake frames instead of just 3 or 4 and they will be like "Oh look, 5090 performance in a 6060 for only $700 USD." Sorry, not happening. I want to be wrong but I'm not holding out much hope -
PaladinNH
It's a slap in the face to current 40 series owners, for sure, but for everyone on older cards, it's still a worthy refresh. Bad naming, agreed. But if I can upgrade to the "4080" for $750 now in the form of the 5070 Ti and with DLSS 4, that's a far better deal than anything Nvidia previously offered last gen.TheyStoppedit said:The 50 series is just a 40 series refresh. Everybody already knows this.
The 5080 is really the 4080Ti
The 5070Ti is what the 4080S should have been
The 5070 is what the 4070Ti Super should be
My message to NVidia is this: You give me fake frames, I'll give you fake dollars. The 5090 is 3x price what I can get a 4080S for. Here in Canada, a 5090 will be 3500 Canadian pesos minimum, on the absolute bottom end. I can get a 4080S used for 1200. I would have 60% of 5090 performance for 30% of the price. I can get a 4090 for 1800 CAD easy, and I would have 75% of the performance while only using 70% of the the 5090s power consumption for 50% of the 5090 price.
Bottom line is: The 50 series can only appeal to those who are willing to pay real dollars for fake frames. I'm not one of them and I know most others arent either. I'm sure 60 series will do 6 fake frames instead of just 3 or 4 and they will be like "Oh look, 5090 performance in a 6060 for only $700 USD." Sorry, not happening. I want to be wrong but I'm not holding out much hope
That said, the 5070 is an awful "upgrade" from the 4070S and the 5090's not worth $2000, but people are paying over $2000 for the 4090 already, so it will sell out. -
Bubba Jones 22%?? Not a freakin' chance! It was obvious that the 5080 would never be "allowed" to get anywhere near the 4090 and the SM count is only trivially higher than the 4080, and in the 5080 things like L2 cache and the 256bit bus stay the same. Everyone knew that even an average 15% uplift over a 4080 would be VERY optimistic and it looks like 10%-ish might be the better bet.Reply
The 5090 barely scales with the SM and power increase over the 4090 and the GDDR7 bandwidth seems almost irrelevant, so the 5080 kind of has nowhere to go, other than raw TDP and (very) small silicon gains giving uplift. -
Phyzzi
My guess is that yields really are that bad. These chips are pushing the limits of what can be designed using semi-classical approximations, as well as at the limits of what can be build using photons that interact with electrons more than nuclei, so using "masking" and etching instead of crystallographic holography and I don't even know what (which I am not even sure could be done for something this complex, much less anything but the most general hand waving vague ideas of how it might happen). Add that this is a new design on a pretty new process and having a few hitches is To Be Expected. While I have no real idea, given the price structure and the fact that the 5090 went up significantly from the 4090 but the 5080 is staying similarly priced, and looking at the price difference between them, I am guessing they expect something like a quarter of their PUs to fail at some level, and probably a fifth or so to fail completely (assuming each chip has two complete PUs), which probably means more are failing now and fewer will fail later and also that they will be spending the next few (or several) months figuring lol out how to salvage as much as possible from the "failed" boards to resell them as 5070's and below, as well as starting to work out how to do a "Super" or "Ti" refresh with chips that have enough extra working among the parts that failed QA for one side or the other to give things a little bump or have a few more be "mostly okay".artk2219 said:With half the die being wasted, I really wonder if it wasn't a better idea to have a separate tape out, either that or the yields are horrendous enough to make it worth it.
That expected failure rate would be over the whole run though, so right now things are probably pretty miserable, and maybe the staggered release of lower level chips is because they aren't really sure what will be salvagable if the whole thing doesn't work. Of course, that's a lot of guess work on my part, but it's not blind guesswork. -
artk2219
Im all for it, with the way the GPU market currently is, there is the space for multiple options.Pigpig said:Now intel become savior for poor gamers:rolleyes:
wait for battlemage B770