Intel Z890 motherboards reportedly ship with the Intel Default Profile by default — alternative profiles are allowed but only selectable by the user

MSI Intel motherboards
(Image credit: MSI)

According to BenchLife.info, Intel’s upcoming Z890 motherboards, expected to be released alongside the forthcoming Intel Core Ultra 200-series (codenamed Arrow Lake) chips, are reportedly shipping with the Intel Default Profile by default. If the information is accurate, motherboard makers cannot set their custom power profiles as the default settings. However, they can still add other profiles that users can select in the BIOS.

The instability of Intel’s Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake chips was caused by faulty microcodes that made the processor ask for elevated voltages. This led to irreparable instability, with some chips ending up dead. Although the primary cause of the instability is an issue with Intel’s design, the custom power profiles that high-end boards apply on the affected Intel chips do not help matters. Intel has since released a patch that addresses the issue, but damaged chips are irreparable, meaning Intel has to replace or refund them.

Arrow Lake CPUs are reportedly unaffected by the instability; however, Intel is erring on the side of caution by allegedly forcing manufacturers to stick to its default power setting. After all, most users would likely not touch the power profile — only enthusiasts who want to get the most out of their CPUs and know what they’re doing would likely tinker with the motherboard’s BIOS. So, most Intel customers who buy the upcoming chips would likely be safe if enhanced power profiles had an unwanted effect on Intel’s new processors.

Suppose you’re a risk taker and want to push your Intel processor to its limits. In that case, you can do so by diving into the BIOS and selecting the custom power profiles that the motherboard manufacturer added to your motherboard. This move means that only those who want the enhanced performance (and know their way around the motherboard’s BIOS settings) would get them. However, this also means that motherboard makers have fewer ways to differentiate their offerings in performance since all Z780 motherboards should be on the Intel Default Profile.

We’re still all for this development, as it reduces the chances that an errant power profile would cause issues with Intel chips. This is important, especially as the company is still reeling from the negative press that the Raptor Lake instability issues brought, not to mention the financial woes it’s been facing since August 1.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Amdlova
    Don't care ... they have FSB overclock? Miss old times.
    Reply
  • acadia11

    “Intel Z890 motherboards reportedly ship with the Intel Default Profile by default”
    Let’s just think about what you wrote there for a second.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    If this report is accurate then that simply means Intel will finally be doing what they should have for over a decade. Ever since the early days of MCE I haven't really understood their hands off wild west of settings approach to motherboard defaults. By all means have a bunch of optional settings and profiles but there really needs to be a consistent out of the box experience.
    Reply
  • why_wolf
    Seems like the sane choice. Just like with OCing RAM. By default it runs at that generations stock speed and the user has to manually tell it to OC. Frankly it should have always been like this. I guess for a long long time it was until every OEM decided they needed to pre-OC their boards to have another marketing blurb to slap on the box.
    Reply
  • ex_bubblehead
    There's nothing preventing the vendors activating their own profile prior to shipping the motherboard out. Just more of "The more things change, the more they stay the same".
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    So now anything above the baseline profile is equivalent to PBO, right? 90% of users will never do it.
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    ex_bubblehead said:
    There's nothing preventing the vendors activating their own profile prior to shipping the motherboard out. Just more of "The more things change, the more they stay the same".
    It literally says that they have to SHIP with the Intel baseline profile as default. So yes there is something stopping them, unless you think Asus is paying the retailers to switch it for them. I’m quite sure Intel has no interest in re-living this nightmare. We need Intel to get back healthy. Things only advance when there’s competition.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    Hey guys! building here the Gigabyte z690 ud4 First put the latest bios f29E with the 0129 intel update... with no CPU no ram q-flash thing... placed the cpu and ram... alright time to see on windows if all working right... Default setting on the Motherboard PUT 280W PL1 and 4096W PL2.
    On a 35w chip! (14600T)

    Where is the intel correction?
    Reply
  • Pierce2623
    Amdlova said:
    Hey guys! building here the Gigabyte z690 ud4 First put the latest bios f29E with the 0129 intel update... with no CPU no ram q-flash thing... placed the cpu and ram... alright time to see on windows if all working right... Default setting on the Motherboard PUT 280W PL1 and 4096W PL2.
    On a 35w chip! (14600T)

    Where is the intel correction?
    I’m pretty sure they don’t force Intel baseline profile on anything but new z890 boards. Older models will still have Asus’s hot sauce settings but should have the micro-code fix as well if you’re on the newest bios.
    Reply
  • BILL1957
    With the cost of PC components these days longevity is more important than a little faster clock speed to most folks.
    If I need more speed I will just move up the tier to a faster CPU if possible.

    Figure that what the higher performing CPU's and GPU's are pulling power wise stock these days and the heat generated as a result one is almost better off to consider undervolting and underclocking than doing any overclocks.
    Reply