Samsung 9100 Pro SSD Review: Samsung’s Capable Answer to Phison’s Storage Gauntlet

An old favorite enters the fray.

Samsung 9100 Pro SSD
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Samsung 9100 Pro is Samsung’s answer for the high-end PCIe 5.0 storage market. It’s a good drive with high performance and power efficiency but falls short of being truly impressive.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Good all-around performance

  • +

    Solid power efficiency

  • +

    2TB is single-sided with heatsink option

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Relatively lackluster on the whole

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Samsung has finally given an answer to the slew of Phison E26-based high-performance PCIe 5.0 SSDs. The 9100 Pro comes in hot, promising up to 8TB of the fastest storage on the planet with the name to back it up. No more compromises with thermal throttling or massive power consumption — the market leader is here to show how it’s done.

Or at least that’s a reasonable expectation. It’s a bit late in the game, especially now that we’ve seen what Silicon Motion’s hardware can do on the Micron 4600. Clearly, Samsung has made careful plans for the 9100 Pro to make sure it would only have to land one blow to retake its position at the top, but time is working against it. In fact, it makes more sense for the 9100 Pro to have a market presence with a capable, affordable drive that avoids the early adopter pitfalls that Phison often faces. It doesn’t have to be the fastest drive around to capture the imagination of storage enthusiasts. It just has to deliver on expectations that would have been considered normal a generation or two ago.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Shane Downing
Contributing Writer

Shane Downing is a Contributing Writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering consumer storage, PC hardware, and AI.

  • VizzieTheViz
    Nice drives, but not particularly impressive.

    Why do you keep doing PlayStation testing with these drives? It’s in there every time and there’s literally hardly any difference between any of the reasonably fast drives, let alone a difference that a person might notice in daily use. Basically everything is just fast enough to max out the PlayStation storage.
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    Sheesh those prices... for such a small increment in % improvement, I really don't expect these to sell well till the prices come down. $200 for 1tb, ~20cents/GB and $300 for 2tb ~15cents/GB, and 4TB for ~13.75cents/GB. All too spendy for this very cost sensitive segment. I like my cheap Gen 3 m2 drives though.

    Looking forward to future does a faster ssd matter segments comparing the latest drives all the way back to sata ssd and optane(still miss it) in the future.
    Reply
  • cyrusfox
    VizzieTheViz said:
    Nice drives, but not particularly impressive.

    Why do you keep doing PlayStation testing with these drives? It’s in there every time and there’s literally hardly any difference between any of the reasonably fast drives, let alone a difference that a person might notice in daily use. Basically everything is just fast enough to max out the PlayStation storage.
    I honestly think that is the main market for overpriced m2 drives, the console market. So the testing is extremely relevant.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    cyrusfox said:
    I honestly think that is the main market for overpriced m2 drives, the console market. So the testing is extremely relevant.
    Wel that’s sort of a reason I guess, getting console players to look at your review even, but as basically everything that’s been released the last year or two maxes out PlayStation storage it seems like a huge waste of time to me.
    Reply
  • Digital~Dreams
    Why is this being compared to the Seagate firecuda 530 when there is a Seagate 540 4tb available ???
    Reply
  • BoredErica
    CDM/ATTO chart for 2tb is missing.
    Reply
  • abryant
    BoredErica said:
    CDM/ATTO chart for 2tb is missing.
    Fixed.
    Reply
  • The5thCacophony
    My computer is old. It has only PCIe v3. I have no need of performance. Just a 2TB drive which should be reliable and silent. Storing photos and my old medias from CD and DVD.

    If there are Nvme drives compatible PCIe v5 or v4 at comparable cost as an old Nvme PCIe3, is it ok I buy the newer version?
    Reply
  • jackt
    overclockers class power consumtion, too much expensive...
    Reply
  • Stomx
    Notices its rediculous kilomegagiga speeds in Steady Write Speed test ? Look at 2nd and 3rd screen. This drive will show off first 40 seconds its 6pack muscles and then blow into the mud like a stone running just as usual 4th gen drive. Avoid at any cost if you move large volumes because every time in less than a minute you will get a reminder that you just wasted your money )
    Reply