Overclocking, Power, And Heat
All of the motherboards in today’s comparison provide frequency ranges that exceed by far any realistic expectations of stability and most voltage ceilings are far beyond any realistic expectations of reliability. Experienced overclockers know not to shoot for the limit at first, but instead determine the maximum supported speed and required voltage by making small changes and retesting repeatedly.
|BIOS Frequency And Voltage Settings (For Overclocking)|
|Asus M4A79T Deluxe||DFI LANParty DK 790FXB-M3H5||Gigabyte MA790FXT-UD5P||MSI 790FX-GD70|
|CPU Ref Clock||200-600 MHz (1 MHz)||200-700 MHz (1 MHz)||200-500 MHz (1 MHz)||200-600 MHz (1 MHz)|
|DRAM Data Rates||800/1066/1333/1600||800/1066/1333/1600||800/1066/1333/1600||800/1066/1333/1600|
|PCIe Clock||100-150 MHz (1 MHz)||100-250 MHz (1 MHz)||100-200 MHz (1 MHz)||100-150 MHz (1 MHz)|
|CPU Vcore||0.80-1.70V (0.0125V)||-800-+775mv (25mv)||+25-600mV (25mV)||0.98-1.93V (0.01V)|
|IMC Voltage||0.80-1.55V (0.0125V)||+3.57, 7.14, 10.71%||+25-600mV (25mV)||0.85-1.83V (0.01V)|
|790FX Core||1.10-1.40V (0.02V)||1.12-1.50V (0.04V)||+0.1, +0.2, +0.3 V||0.75-1.83V (0.01V)|
|SB750 Core||1.20-1.35V (0.15V)||1.20-1.50V (0.20V)||+0.1, +0.2, +0.3 V||0.85-1.83V (0.01V)|
|DRAM Voltage||1.50-2.50V (0.02V)||1.50-2.49V (0.22V)||+50-750mV (50mV)||1.19-2.40V (0.01V)|
|CAS Latency||4-12 Cycles||4-11 Cycles||4-12 Cycles||4-12 Cycles|
|RAS To CAS Delay||5-12 Cycles||5-11 Cycles||5-12 Cycles||5-12 Cycles|
|Row Precharge||5-12 Cycles||5-11 Cycles||5-12 Cycles||5-12 Cycles|
|tRAS||15-30 Cycles||16-30 Cycles||15-30 Cycles||15-30 Cycles|
The two boards with the “smallest” CPU voltage regulators also have the most aggressive voltage levels, but we limited our CPU core to 1.45 V to assure longevity.
The two motherboards with 10-phase power regulation finished first and last, with Gigabyte providing the highest stable CPU clock at our chosen voltage levels.
MSI has the best reference clock stability. A combination of first-place reference clock and second-place CPU stability could make the 790FX-GD70 a top overclocking choice for multiplier-locked processors.
Dropping timings all the way back to 9-9-9-28 at 2T wasn’t enough to get most configurations beyond DDR3-1600, though Asus did break that barrier with four modules installed.
The two five-phase power regulators placed first and last in thermal performance. MSI’s win is probably due to its enormous VRM sink.
All of today’s motherboards appear energy efficient, yet none stand apart. Chipset and CPU manufacturer AMD gets all the credit for an overall good showing.
(2.80 GHz, 86.0 MB Cache)
I never knew any AMD processors had that much cache!
1.66% better than the worst performer in the tests. :-)
Not much point in throwing that much GPU horsepower at a motherboard review; the card Thomas used is our current reference--and it's more than ample for showcasing the differences between these boards.
If you want to see quad-CrossFire for any specific reason, feel free to let us know and we can put together a story idea!
Consistent would have been better if not for the fear of people pointing out ever tiny inconsistency. Just remember, if you're 5'11" tall it's clear to just about everyone that you're not 6'!!!
Could you clarify that a bit Chris? Are you saying you would not expect any difference in crossfire between the MBs? If so, that's OK. However, if there's going to be a difference, that is the main reason to buy a 790FX. If you aren't going to crossfire might as well get a GX.
I suspect the chipset isn't the whole story and the various manufacturers could still screw up the PCI-E voltages or something :p