System Builder Marathon: Sub-$1000 PC
Features
published
Test System Configuration
Here’s a recap of our $1000 system’s hardware configuration.
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Processor | Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 |
Row 1 - Cell 0 | 2.53GHz, 1066FSB, 3MB Cache |
Motherboard | MSI P7N SLI Platinum, BIOS 1.1 (02/25/2008) |
RAM | Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400 |
Row 4 - Cell 0 | DDR2-800, 2x 1024 MB, CAS 4.0-4-4-12 |
Hard Drive | Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 ST3500630AS |
Row 6 - Cell 0 | 500 GB, 7200 RPM, 16 MB Cache, SATA 300 |
Networking | NVIDIA nForce onboard Gigabit Ethernet NIC |
Graphics Cards | 2x Gigabyte GeForce 8800 GT, 512 MB RAM (Per Card) |
Row 9 - Cell 0 | 700 MHz GPU, 1840 MHz RAM Data Rate |
Power Supply | Silverstone ST400 (400W, ATX12V v2.2) |
Row 11 - Cell 0 | System Software & Drivers |
OS | Windows Vista Ultimate 6.0.6000 (Vista Retail) |
DirectX Version | DirectX 10.0 |
Platform Driver | NVIDIA nForce Version 9.46 |
Graphics Driver | NVIDIA ForceWare 175.16 |
And this is our benchmark configuration.
Benchmark Settings
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 - Cell 0 | 3D-Games |
Crysis | Version: 1.1 |
Row 2 - Cell 0 | Video Quality 1: High Details No Anti-Aliasing |
Row 3 - Cell 0 | Video Quality 2: Very High Details, 4x Anti-Aliasing |
Row 4 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: Benchmark_CPU.bat |
Prey | Version: 1.3 |
Row 6 - Cell 0 | Video Quality 1: Default (No AA, 8x AF) |
Row 7 - Cell 0 | Video Quality 2: High Quality, 4x AA |
Row 8 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: THG-Demo |
Supreme | Version: 3.220 |
Commander | Video Quality 1: Default |
Row 11 - Cell 0 | Video Quality 2: High Fidelity, High Shadow, 4x AA |
Row 12 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: Real 60 Game |
Unreal | Version: Retail |
Tournament 3 | Texture Detail: 5 |
Row 15 - Cell 0 | World Detail: 5 |
Row 16 - Cell 0 | Field of View: 100 |
Row 17 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: Botmatch (WAR-Torlan, 12 bots, 1 Minute) |
Warhammer | Version: 1.6 |
Mark of Chaos | Video Quality:Default (Highest Settings) |
Row 20 - Cell 0 | Demo: THG Timedemo (1 Minute) |
Row 21 - Cell 0 | Audio |
iTunes 7.2 | Version: 7.1.1.5 |
Row 23 - Cell 0 | Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min |
Row 24 - Cell 0 | High Quality (160kb/s) |
Lame MP3 | Version: 3.98 Beta 3 (05-22-2007) |
Row 26 - Cell 0 | Audio CD "Terminator II SE", 53 min |
Row 27 - Cell 0 | wave to MP3 |
Row 28 - Cell 0 | 160kb/s |
Row 29 - Cell 0 | Video |
TMPEGEnc | Version: 4.2.10.211 |
4.0 Xpress | Import File: Terminator 2 SE DVD (5 Minutes) |
Row 32 - Cell 0 | Resolution: 720x576 (PAL) 16:9 |
Row 33 - Cell 0 | Audio: Dolby Digital, 48000 Hz, 6-Channel, English |
Row 34 - Cell 0 | Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder (160kb/s) |
DivX 6.6 | Version: 6.6.1 |
Row 36 - Cell 0 | Profile: Home Theater Profile (720 x 576) |
Row 37 - Cell 0 | 1-pass, 780 kb/s |
Row 38 - Cell 0 | Encoding mode: Insane Quality |
Row 39 - Cell 0 | Enhanced multithreading |
XviD 1.1.2 | Version: 1.1.2 |
Row 41 - Cell 0 | Target quantizer: 1.00 (maximum quality) |
Row 42 - Cell 0 | Applications |
Adobe | Version: 10.0x20070321 |
Photoshop CS3 | Filtering 69MB TIF Photo |
Row 45 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: Tom’s Guide-Benchmark V1.0.0.4 |
Autodesk | Version: 9.0 |
3D Studio Max | Rendering One Video Frame |
Row 48 - Cell 0 | Quality: HTDV 1920x1080 & 1280x720 |
Grisoft AVG | Version: 7.5.467 |
Anti-Virus | Virus Base: 269.6.1/776 |
Row 51 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: Scanning 3.82GB Application Folder |
Maxon | Version: 10.008 |
Cinema 4D | Resolution: 1280 x 1024 |
Row 54 - Cell 0 | Benchmark: Rose Drop, 8-bits (50 Frames) |
Rarlab Winrar | Version 3.70 BETA 8 |
Row 56 - Cell 0 | Compression = Best |
Row 57 - Cell 0 | Dictionary = 4096 kB |
Row 58 - Cell 0 | Uncompressed Folder Size: 642MB |
Row 59 - Cell 0 | Synthetics |
SPECviewperf 9 | Version: 9.0.3 |
PCMark05 Pro | Version: 1.1.0 |
Row 62 - Cell 0 | System, CPU and Memory Tests |
Row 63 - Cell 0 | Windows Media Player 11.0.6000.6324 |
Row 64 - Cell 0 | Windows Media Encoder 9.00.00.2980 |
Futuremark | Version 1.10 |
3DMark 2006 | System Test Only |
SiSoftware | Version 2008.1.12.30 |
Sandra XII | CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic, Multimedia |
Row 69 - Cell 0 | Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark |
Current page: Test System Configuration
Prev Page Power Supply: Silverstone ST400 Next Page 3D Games: Crysis, PreyStay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
70 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
Haiku214 I'm glad to know that you don't really need a huge amount of wattage to run the 8800 gt sli. How about for the ati 4850 crossfireX? Is 460 watts with a combined 42 amps for the 12V rail be enough?Reply -
hellwig Seeing the new prices for components, couldn't you have stayed with the AMD theme, just to satisfy reader curiosity. I.e. 2x3870 in crossfire (or 3870x2) = $300, AMD 790X/FX MB = $125, Phenom 9850 Black Ed = $235 (or 6400+ X2 Black Ed = $160, making room for 2x4850), Plus all cheaper components from current build. You would have still been under the $1000 mark, and the dual 3870/4850 would have given much closer results in the games category, and the unlocked multiplier would have given AMD a little more benefit in the overclocking category compared to the locked 9500 used previously. This would have been more interesting especially since your $2000 PC was really a $1400 PC (the only difference between $1000 and $2000 now being GTS vs. GT and quad vs. dual).Reply -
randomizer The first Crysis graph looks more like Very High, not High. I get around 32FPS with a single 9600GT on high at 1440x900.Reply -
cjl Considering that those GT's ran you $188 each, even counting a $30 rebate, that should have left 4850's well within your grasp, and they would have significantly outperformed the GT's. In fact, they probably would have outperformed yourReply -
cjl Hmm. Looks like it took my less than sign as HTML tagging. That should have said "outperformed your less than $2000 system"Reply -
yonef Same problem in here (like in $2000 system build)!Reply
Tom's realy starts to annoying me:
First of all: Why the hell you need crapy 8800GT??! while for the same prize you can buy HD4850s http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121253 -> 2xHD4850=$330 < 2x8800GT=$386 !!!
Second of all: 2xHD4850 will easy outperform 2x8800GT even in crysis :D(wich is exclusively for nvidia)
Third, but not least: How the hell whole system with 2X8800GT will run on 400W PS ?!!? I'm so convinced; -
str8ballistik This is really dumb. I love how they add up only a tower. you have to add in the monitor, speakers, mouse/keyboard, etc.. That is what a computer is, not a tower. You get peoples hopes up to buy a computer, then they realize, oh yeah, I have to buy this other stuff to actually be able to use the tower. Come on, be more realistic. I would love to see a mid-rang computer, while seeing what size monitor you can get with it.Reply -
randomizer yonefWhy the hell you need crapy 8800GT??!It's funny how a suddenly card becomes worse when another card is released better than it, even funnier when a few weeks ago this was THE card to buy. Did you stop to consider when this article was written? Perhaps the card wasn't available when they wrote this, and in order to get the article out on time they had to go with "crappy" cards.Reply -
giovanni86 If u don't already own a monitor/keyboard/mouse/speakers n your reading this thread you are a retard. Like seriously why would you not own those things already. Personally i like these articles they make, it puts together a PC built tower for you already kind of knowing what u could get at such a great price point. And 2ndly in my opinion ATI has nothing on NVIDIA, although ppl claim it to be better and cheaper then NVIDIA's line up i beg the differ. And 3rdly i can't believe that a sli system as well could run off a 400watt PSU.Reply