Adata Falcon M.2 NVMe SSD Review: Soaring above SATA

Adata’s Falcon is dressed to impress

Adata Falcon
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Like the last Realtek-powered SSD we reviewed, the Adata XPG Spectrix S40G, the components at the heart of Adata’s Falcon make for an interesting mix of performance and endurance that lands somewhere between the entry-level and mainstream. Dishing out sequential performance of up to 3.1/1.5 GBps read/write, Realtek’s RTS5762DL 8-channel architecture, and Micron’s latest 96-Layer TLC flash, Adata’s Falcon soars well above its slower entry-level competition. And, with a large dynamic SLC write cache that spans one-third of the Falcon’s available capacity, it can handle most file transfers you throw its way at its rated speeds.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

But other things matter just as much, if not more, than peak performance. While Adata’s Falcon proved quite capable under most sequential workloads, its DRAMless design isn’t the most responsive under random workloads and hindered it a bit during application benchmarks. Also, writing to the SSD after the SLC write cache fills can be quite slow.

Host memory buffer (HMB) tech, which uses system memory instead of memory on the SSDs, can only help so much with a DRAMless architecture, which is why WD opted to go without the feature on their DRAMless Blue SN550. Using controller SRAM instead, WD’s 1TB Blue SN550 offers faster responsiveness in day-to-day use. It’s even solid when we hammer it with heavy application workloads, handling them with very consistent performance for $10 less than the Falcon at the time of publishing.  But it doesn’t look nearly as sleek, nor does it come in a larger 2TB capacity to compete with the Falcon on the high-end.

On the higher end of the market, Adata’s XPG SX8200 Pro is very tough competition for the Falcon, though. With a Silicon Motion SM2262EN 8-channel NVMe controller clocked at 650MHz, onboard DRAM and Micron’s 64L TLC NAND flash, it is one of the fastest SSDs on the market. In our benchmarking, it dished out performance figures that exceed the Falcon’s for only $10 more at the 1TB capacity and $20 more at 2TB. And, although the black finish isn’t as glamorous as the Falcon’s golden finish, it comes with a heat spreader to keep it cool, too.

Adata markets the Falcon as a more of an industrial/prosumer device and has even gone as far as to include AES 256-bit encryption support, but the flashy gold heat spreader looks better suited for a sleek custom-built system rather than a boring business workstation. Adata’s Falcon is a perfect fit for those on a budget with motherboards without M.2 heatsinks, The drive also comes in a single-sided form factor, even at the 2TB capacity, so the Falcon should fit into almost any laptop and keep cool, too.

If you are in the market for a new NVMe SSD and are on a tighter budget, the Adata Falcon isn’t without its faults, but it will deliver fairly good performance, and look good doing it. Not to mention, Adata’s Falcon endurance ratings match it as well as more costly competitors such as Samsung’s 970 EVO Plus and WD Black NVMe SSDs, while also being backed by a five-year warranty. Be sure to give Adata’s Falcon your consideration.

MORE: Best SSDs

MORE: How We Test HDDs And SSDs

MORE: All SSD Content

Sean Webster
Storage Reviewer

Sean is a Contributing Editor at Tom’s Hardware US, covering storage hardware.

  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    This is an example of where technology is clearly changed/reduced only to save money for the mfg at the expense of the unknowing consumer. Removing DRAM only benefits the mfg, and it's bad for the consumer, especially when they don't know the technology limitations.

    So that being the case, it should be priced WELL below the pricing of competing solutions with DRAM (like Adata's own SX8200, as mentioned.) Pricing it only $10-20 less is a joke & a rip-off of the consumer, because no one is saying "I'd like to waste more time every single time I use my computer just to save $10".

    P.S. Calling this drive a "prosumer" model is also a joke.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    Pricing it only $10-20 less is a joke & a rip-off of the consumer
    Well, a DRAM chip only costs ~$2, so the manufacturer isn't really saving all that much on the BoM from skipping it and still has to make its otherwise mostly unchanged costs, so it cannot make it all that much cheaper despite the substantially worse user experience.
    Reply
  • gg83
    I have a 1tb adata s40 rgb m.2 and it seems fast. This seems to compete directly with it and the Falcon lacks dram. The dynamic cache must make the difference?
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    InvalidError said:
    Well, a DRAM chip only costs ~$2, so the manufacturer isn't really saving all that much on the BoM from skipping it and still has to make its otherwise mostly unchanged costs, so it cannot make it all that much cheaper despite the substantially worse user experience.

    Yeah, I'd prefer mfgs stop producing the cheaper tech & keep their profit margins with the existing higher-performing tech. Keep DRAM and drop QLC (also stop the "penta-layer" before that hits production). I've been through the changes from SLC to MLC and then TLC. TLC can mostly keep up the performance to MLC-levels, but QLC is definitely worse. So make the minimum level of flash tech at TLC, and then just work on improving your processes for better gains/profits. Then the consumer is getting the newer tech that actually improves performance, versus the "maybe" of QLC & DRAM-less SSDs.

    Can't wait to switch to Optane/3D-XPoint Now that's where I'd love to see more research going into increasing capacity and lowering prices!
    Reply
  • 2Be_or_Not2Be
    gg83 said:
    I have a 1tb adata s40 rgb m.2 and it seems fast. This seems to compete directly with it and the Falcon lacks dram. The dynamic cache must make the difference?

    Your XPG Spectrix S40G is definitely better than the "Falcon". The onboard DRAM makes a difference in regards to performance.
    Reply
  • gg83
    2Be_or_Not2Be said:
    Your XPG Spectrix S40G is definitely better than the "Falcon". The onboard DRAM makes a difference in regards to performance.
    And it looks kickass!
    Reply