System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: AMD System Value Compared
-
Page 1:Going Green To Save Some Green?
-
Page 2:Test Settings
-
Page 3:Benchmark Results: Crysis
-
Page 4:Benchmark Results: Fallout 3
-
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
-
Page 6:Benchmark Results: H.A.W.X.
-
Page 7:Benchmark Results: World In Conflict
-
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
-
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Productivity
-
Page 10:Benchmark Results: Synthetic
-
Page 11:Power, Heat, And Efficiency
-
Page 12:Super Value Conclusion
System Builder Marathon, September 2009: The Articles
Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (we’ll update them as each story is published). And remember, these systems are all being given away at the end of the marathon. After some delay (sorry folks), the contest is ready to be entered. Please visit the entry page, here.
Day 1: The $650 Gaming PC
Day 2: The $1,250 Enthusiast PC
Day 3: The $2,500 Performance PC
Day 4: Performance and Value Dissected
Introduction
We answered overwhelming requests to use AMD in our latest System Builder Marathon and found the excellent gaming, good prices, and mediocre overclocking our previous component reviews had lead us to expect. Value seekers should be especially pleased with our processor selection while criticizing a few of the “unnecessary expenses” in our highest-priced build. Yet supposedly-superfluous features aren’t the most surprising differences in today’s comparison: Let’s also reconsider a few of the performance-oriented component choices.
| September SBM PC Component Prices | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| $650-Limit Build | $1,250-Limit Build | $2,500-Limit Build | |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P | MSI 790FX-GD70 | MSI 790FX-GD70 |
| Processor | AMD Phenom II X2 550 BE 3.1 GHz Dual-Core | AMD Phenom II X4 945 3 GHz Quad-Core | AMD Phenom II X4 955 3.2 GHz Quad-Core |
| Memory | OCZ Gold OCZ2G10664GK 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR2-1066 | Patriot PVS34G1333LLKN 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDR3-1333 | 2 x Crucial CT2KIT25664BA1339 8GB (4 x 2GB) DDR3-1333 |
| Graphics | 2 x Sapphire 100245HDMI Radeon HD 4850 512MB | 4 x Gigabyte GV-R485OC-1GH Radeon HD 4850 1GB | 3 x MSI R4890-T2D1G OC Radeon HD 4890 1GB |
| OS/Program Drives | WD Blue WD5000AAKS 500GB, 7200 RPM | WD Black WD6401AALS 640GB, 7200 RPM | 2 x Intel X25-M 80GB Model SSDSA2MH080G1 (RAID 0) |
| Storage Hard Drives | 2 x WD Black 1TB 7200 RPM Model WD1001FALS (RAID 1) | ||
| Optical | Samsung SATA DVD±RW Model SH-S223B (22x) | Optiarc 24X SATA DVD±RW Model AD-7240S-0BDVD/CD | LG SATA BD-RE/HD-DVD Model GGW-H20L (6x BD-R) |
| Case | Rosewill Wind Ryder | NZXT Tempest | NZXT Panzerbox |
| Power | Antec EarthWatts EA650 650W | PC Power & Cooling S75CF 750W | Corsair CMPSU-1000HX 1000W |
| CPU Cooler | AMD Boxed Heatsink | Xigmatek HDT-S1283 | Swiftech H20-220 |
| Component Cooling | Antec 0761345-75018-9 "SpotCool" LED Fan | ||
| SSD Tray | SNT SNT-SATA2221B Hot-Swappable Backplane | ||
| Bay Adapter | Vantec MRK-250FD | ||
| Total Cost | $647 | $1,265 | $2,490 |
The cheapest build in today’s lineup is a lean, mean gaming machine, fitting two Radeon HD 4850 graphics cards and a high-speed dual-core processor into a sub-$650 package. At the other end of the scale, the high-end build takes an “everything but the kitchen sink” approach, adding liquid cooling and SSD drives to fill reader demands, plus redundant traditional drives to fill the storage demands of high-end buyers. The $1,265 machine attempts to trump the highest-priced build with a total of four graphics cards, sacrificing storage redundancy to fit these within its budget.
But with only 512MB per graphics card, will the cheapest system be powerful enough to provide the best gaming value? Will the middle-priced system’s four mainstream-performance graphics cards really be able to overtake the triple-threat high-end cards of its expensive competitor? And for the high-end system, is there really any good reason for gamers to spend this much on drives and cooling? Let’s find out.
- Going Green To Save Some Green?
- Test Settings
- Benchmark Results: Crysis
- Benchmark Results: Fallout 3
- Benchmark Results: Far Cry 2
- Benchmark Results: H.A.W.X.
- Benchmark Results: World In Conflict
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video Encoding
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Synthetic
- Power, Heat, And Efficiency
- Super Value Conclusion
On another note, this reminds me of the 3x260 vs 2x280 article you guys wrote a while back so i would like to see, if possible, another follow up article based on this concept of "the more the merrier"
Lastly, don't be shy in using more then 2 graphics cards in future system builder marathons since it's a nice change of air.
Now I want to see a Pentium four paired with 4x 5870... I'm serius.
Though some of us are iffy about multiple cards. Heavily diminishing returns do come into effect with a multi-card setup.
Then it would be great to see a chart with all of these systems being compared. For instance seeing the 3x4890 $2,500 build vs an i7 3xGTx285 build for the same price! Pls try to include AA in crysis benches even though they might be low in 2560x1600, at least we will get an idea of how important the next gen cards will stack up and utilize the AA x4 and DX11. Thanks and nice work as these articles are interesting. You guys should make a magazine or supply articles to the likes of PC world for real bench testing and not general reviews.
good marathon.
if anything i'm an amd fanboy - 5600+ and 4850 over here.
I didn't call them slugs i called them slugish. THG have shown i7s do better at gaming especially when u stack up the gfx.
I'll be updating the link to the contest today sometime in all three stories, then having the news team post a news piece letting everyone know that the contest is ready! Good luck!!
Yet there are parts worth 640$ more in the performance build compared to the others (ssd's and bd-re) which doesn't affect gaming performance, at least not in the way measured on the article - The ssd's probably do but you did not include loading times, minimum fps etc.
Also the liquid cooling value is rather questionable, given that it only added few mhz compared to the ~40$ (100$ less) rosewill fort120 hsf. Did you try switching fan direction / making push/pull config on the water cooling? I guess it'll cool the cpu somewhat better and still be quite enough to keep the system out of the red zone.
I know that's nitpicking and you didn't mind value in your 2500$ rig, and I really appreciate all the efforts and thoughts put into these systems, but that's still rather unfair since (gaming) performance/value was one of the criterias, when the 2500$ system would actually perform the same as a ~1800$ one.
I didn't include the adapters / antec spotcool cuz that's roughly (and I'm being fair here) the same price as the dvd-rw's on the other systems.