AMD Radeon R9 390X, R9 380 And R7 370 Tested

MSI R9 390X Gaming 8G

Let’s first take a look at the current flagship, AMD’s Radeon R9 390X. In the end, this is just a 290X overclocked to 1100MHz from the factory; it should have all the limitations that come with such a configuration. In fact, we opted against our own overclocking analysis due to the very small margin that’s left for enthusiasts to exploit. The stock GPU frequency is only 50MHz under the highest stable overclock we’ve been able to achieve with AMD’s Radeon R9 290X models.

The MSI R9 390X Gaming 8G’s memory is overclocked to 1525MHz, which is a much more significant jump from the 290X reference model’s 1250MHz. Again, this doesn’t leave much room for pushing clock rates higher.

MSI R9 390X Gaming 8G
GPU Clock Frequency:
Stock: 1100 MHz
Maximum Stable OC: 1175 MHz
Memory Clock Frequency:
Stock: 1525 MHz
Maximum Stable OC: 1550 MHz
Cooler:
Zero Frozr, Two Fans (94mm Fan Blades)
1x 8mm Heat Pipe + 4x 6mm Heat Pipe (Nickel-Plated)
Vertical Fins, Two Axial Fans, Semi-Passive Operation
Black Back Plate with Small Openings without Cooling Functionality
Connectors:
2x DVI-D (No Analog Signal!), 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Power Supply:
1x 8-Pin + 1x 6-Pin PCIe
Measured Power Consumption:
14W (Idle)
293W (Gaming)
364W (Stress Test)
Installed Dimensions (L x H x D):
27.5 x 12.5 x 4.6cm + 0.5cm Back Plate
Requires Three Slots
Weight:
1218g
MSRP:
Unknown

The data provided by GPU-Z isn’t surprising. We’re glad to see that the memory is no longer supplied by Elpida, which has proven problematic in the past. Instead, AMD is using faster memory modules by Hynix.

For a graphics card that can peak at more than 360W, and then needs to get rid of its waste heat, the included Zero Frozr cooler does a surprisingly good job. MSI is doing what it can to make this card a viable option. It’s certainly not the board partners’ fault that AMD is pushing its Hawaii GPU so far beyond its sweet spot of approximately 180W. The added performance comes at the price of lower efficiency.

The new cooler is really not that different from the one we know from MSI’s R9 290X Gaming 4G. It’s a proven design featuring a central 8mm heat pipe, four other 6mm heat pipes located on the side and a massive heat sink. The back plate attached to the card is just there for eye candy and to stabilize the PCB. It doesn’t have any thermal pads, and consequently can’t do any cooling. 

Taking a look at the bottom of the graphics card, we see that the VRM is being cooled by the card’s thermal solution. This is a great design decision, since the big heat sink is more effective than smaller stick-on sinks reliant on airflow through the card. This also helps cool the voltage converters when the fan is turned off at idle or very low loads.

The 8- and 6-pin power connectors are a familiar sight; we know them from AMD’s Radeon R9 290X. However, the 300W these should provide, together with the PCIe slot’s 75W, are reached during average gaming loads and far surpassed during a more demanding stress test. So long as you have a decent power supply with better-than 20 AWG wiring, you shouldn’t have to worry. Our figures might be borderline, but they’re certainly not dangerous.

MSI’s card uses vertical cooling fins, which direct airflow in the direction of the motherboard and chassis’ side wall. This certainly isn’t great for the motherboard, but it’s probably the only way to deal with this much waste heat. The cooler’s body, which is divided into two parts, operates at the limit of what’s bearable when it comes to operating noise.

We haven’t been able to locate a switch for a dual-BIOS setup, which means that the stock firmware is the only one we get to play with. Display outputs are limited such that there’s no analog signal to be found any more. The two exclusively digital DVI-D connectors are joined by an HDMI and a DisplayPort connector.

This thread is closed for comments
277 comments
    Your comment
  • mikenygmail
    Nicely done AMD. Keep up the good work Lisa! :)
  • FreshPineApples
    Cool
  • BadNight
    Why did you ignore 390? It's basically a 390x for $100 less.
  • Grognak
    390X at 4K is the only one showing anything that could be called an improvement and that's entirely due to the additional RAM, which you can already get on a 290X. I fear for the future.
  • envy14tpe
    Again I am left disappointed....AMD please stop doing this to me. So what I learned is the 390X is the same as the 290X at 1440p or below (which is 95% or more of gamers) and the 390X only excels at 4k but still only on par with the 980 (non ti). Looks like I'm abandoning AMD for my next GPU. damn it.
  • whimseh
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!
  • FormatC
    Quote:
    Why did you ignore 390?
    I can only test what I have. Too less samples :(

    The 390X is'nt a bad card per se - it depends a lot at the price and your personal preferences.
  • fudoka711
    Wait, I think I'm misunderstanding something. Is the 390x a rebranding of the 290x, but costing $100 more??
  • HideOut
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!

    These are rebadge cards, their new cards are due out in days. Fanboy
  • de5_Roy
    MSI R9 390X Gaming 8G's texture fillrate in the spec table (1st page) may have been incorrect. the gpu-z screeny shows 193.6 GTexels/sec.
  • HideOut
    While im at it, theres a typo up top (maybe someone else pointed it out by now?)

    390x/290x water cooled. Texture fill rates should be the same but they are not.
  • mikenygmail
    Impressive, AMD really did well with the Fiji archictecture, though you wouldn't really know it from the article and comments.
  • FormatC
    @HideOut & de5_Roy
    There are typos in US this version, in German it was already fixed. Copy'n'Paste from an older table. Sorry. I'll inform my US colleagues to fix ist soon.
  • vertexx
    Love all that MSI Red & Black!

    I wonder what a fully enabled Tonga GPU could do.....
  • afya
    Wrong driver. Use the new 15.15 to test again. The original 15.200 shown in GPU-Z is not very optimized.
  • danilson1009
    Its funny because guru3d.com tested the MSI 390x and the gtx 980 and at 1440p and 4k the 2 cards are almost identical across a whole lot more games tested. Why are these tests so much different???
  • Emanuel Elmo
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!
    These are rebadge cards, their new cards are due out in days. Fanboy


    And exactly which ones will those be?
  • dragonsqrrl
    Quote:
    Wait, I think I'm misunderstanding something. Is the 390x a rebranding of the 290x, but costing $100 more??

    Yes, you're comparing the street price of the 4GB 290X to the MSRP of the 390X. Unfortunately for AMD the 390X will likely fall below MSRP fairly quickly.
  • ccarroz
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!

    I grabbed a Ti as well since I was sick of waiting any longer. Would like to see how the Furry X competes though. I find it strange that we get Furry X made for 4k, but only has 4GB of RAM yet they give the 390x 8GB? I am also hooking up the ti to a 4k TV so the lack of HDMI 2.0 in all of these cards is a deal breaker.
  • jjb8675309
    Absolutely no reason to buy these cards, not impressed at all, glad I snatched a slightly used gtx 970 a while ago.
  • ern88
    Why the hell would they drop only 2 gigs of ram in the 380's. That's just retarded. Hell my HD7950 has 3 gigs.
  • John Wittenberg
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!
    These are rebadge cards, their new cards are due out in days. Fanboy
    And exactly which ones will those be?


    The Fury X and the Fury X2 which are the new Fiji based cards with HBM. However, my understanding is that they won't be released to market until around September this year. Benchmarks show the Fury X often beating the 980 Ti, but the Fury X2 blows everything away due to it being a dual GPU card (that is still smaller than the 780 Ti/980 Ti - wowza).
  • tslot05qsljgo9ed
    Quote: The small Pitcairn-based graphics card manages to stay significantly under 150W. Average is 147.36 Watts

    How can you say 147.36 Watts is "significantly under 150W" with a straight face?

    That is only 2.64 wattls lower or 1.76% less. That in reality is NOT significantly lower.
  • FunSurfer
    How come the GTX 970 uses 168W on gaming and 243W on stress while the GTX 980 uses 185W on gaming and 177W on stress? 0_o