AMD Radeon R9 390X, R9 380 And R7 370 Tested

MSI R9 380 Gaming 2G

Tonga reloaded? MSI’s R9 380 Gaming 2G is practically identical to the R9 285 Gaming G2. The “new” version receives a meager 27MHz boost over the 285’s OC mode, which defaulted to 973MHz. It appears that the power target rises as well, which we’ll get to later.

The bottom line is that there’s barely any room for meaningful overclocking. The card maxes out at 1135MHz. An average of five to seven percent more usable performance is paid for with a virtual explosion in power consumption. Our measurements jump above 200W, which just isn’t worth it.

The memory is made by Samsung this time around, and its clock rate goes up a bit from the R9 285 Gaming 2G’s 1375MHz to 1400MHz. We were able to overclock it safely all the way to 1500MHz. Anything above that just wasn’t stable over longer time periods. Here’s an overview of the technical specifications:

MSI R9 390X Gaming 8G
GPU Clock Frequency:
Stock: 1000MHz
Maximum Stable OC: 1135MHz
Memory Clock Frequency:
Stock: 1400MHz
Maximum Stable OC: 1500MHz

Cooler:
Zero Frozr, Two Fans (94mm Fan Blades)
1x 8mm Heat Pipe + 4x 6mm Heat Pipe (Nickel-Plated)
Horizontal Fins, Two Axial Fans, Semi-Passive Operation
Black Back Plate with Small Openings without Cooling Functionality
Connectors:
1x DVI-I (with Analog Signal), 1x DVI-D, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Power Supply:
2x 6-Pin PCIe
Measured Power Consumption:
12W (Idle)
184W (Gaming)
234W (Stress Test)
Installed Dimensions (L x H x D):
26.8 x 13.5 x 3.5 cm + 0.5cm Back Plate
Requires Two Slots
Weight:
848g
MSRP:
Unknown

Again, the data provided by GPU-Z doesn’t present us with any surprises. The changes from the graphics card’s predecessor are largely cosmetic in nature.

It’s too bad that Tonga XT with its 2048 shader units is an Apple-exclusive. AMD traded an immediate influx of money for the chance to give PC enthusiasts something new to talk about. This decision is now coming back to haunt AMD’s partners and customers outside of the Mac universe. More so than any other card introduced today, Tonga XT had the potential to make a splash.

The cooler found under the slightly modified cover is really just an update to the previous design rather than something new. However, the position of the heat pipes is changed so that there’s one central 8mm heat pipe and four additional 6mm heat pipes on the side.

The back plate is screwed to the card just like the one on its bigger sibling. It also serves the same function, which is to say that it looks nice and stabilizes the card’s PCB. Without thermal pads, it can’t help draw heat away from the board.

We can see from the bottom that the VRM is cooled by a flat plate that has to make do with the airflow that comes through the thermal solution above it.

The two 6-pin power connectors are familiar from AMD’s Radeon R9 285, but the 225W specification is now surpassed a bit during full load and stress test scenarios. The card stays well under this number during gaming, though.

The graphics card uses horizontal cooling fins, which makes sense for a cooler body that consists of a single block and not as much waste heat. Some of that thermal energy can be exhausted out the back of the I/O panel this way.

This graphics card also has a single UEFI BIOS. In contrast to its bigger sibling, there’s an analog signal coming from the DVI-I connector. But the second DVI connector is digital-only. In addition, there’s one HDMI and one DisplayPort connector.

This thread is closed for comments
277 comments
    Your comment
  • mikenygmail
    Nicely done AMD. Keep up the good work Lisa! :)
  • FreshPineApples
    Cool
  • BadNight
    Why did you ignore 390? It's basically a 390x for $100 less.
  • Grognak
    390X at 4K is the only one showing anything that could be called an improvement and that's entirely due to the additional RAM, which you can already get on a 290X. I fear for the future.
  • envy14tpe
    Again I am left disappointed....AMD please stop doing this to me. So what I learned is the 390X is the same as the 290X at 1440p or below (which is 95% or more of gamers) and the 390X only excels at 4k but still only on par with the 980 (non ti). Looks like I'm abandoning AMD for my next GPU. damn it.
  • whimseh
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!
  • FormatC
    Quote:
    Why did you ignore 390?
    I can only test what I have. Too less samples :(

    The 390X is'nt a bad card per se - it depends a lot at the price and your personal preferences.
  • fudoka711
    Wait, I think I'm misunderstanding something. Is the 390x a rebranding of the 290x, but costing $100 more??
  • HideOut
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!

    These are rebadge cards, their new cards are due out in days. Fanboy
  • de5_Roy
    MSI R9 390X Gaming 8G's texture fillrate in the spec table (1st page) may have been incorrect. the gpu-z screeny shows 193.6 GTexels/sec.
  • HideOut
    While im at it, theres a typo up top (maybe someone else pointed it out by now?)

    390x/290x water cooled. Texture fill rates should be the same but they are not.
  • mikenygmail
    Impressive, AMD really did well with the Fiji archictecture, though you wouldn't really know it from the article and comments.
  • FormatC
    @HideOut & de5_Roy
    There are typos in US this version, in German it was already fixed. Copy'n'Paste from an older table. Sorry. I'll inform my US colleagues to fix ist soon.
  • vertexx
    Love all that MSI Red & Black!

    I wonder what a fully enabled Tonga GPU could do.....
  • afya
    Wrong driver. Use the new 15.15 to test again. The original 15.200 shown in GPU-Z is not very optimized.
  • danilson1009
    Its funny because guru3d.com tested the MSI 390x and the gtx 980 and at 1440p and 4k the 2 cards are almost identical across a whole lot more games tested. Why are these tests so much different???
  • Emanuel Elmo
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!
    These are rebadge cards, their new cards are due out in days. Fanboy


    And exactly which ones will those be?
  • dragonsqrrl
    Quote:
    Wait, I think I'm misunderstanding something. Is the 390x a rebranding of the 290x, but costing $100 more??

    Yes, you're comparing the street price of the 4GB 290X to the MSRP of the 390X. Unfortunately for AMD the 390X will likely fall below MSRP fairly quickly.
  • ccarroz
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!

    I grabbed a Ti as well since I was sick of waiting any longer. Would like to see how the Furry X competes though. I find it strange that we get Furry X made for 4k, but only has 4GB of RAM yet they give the 390x 8GB? I am also hooking up the ti to a 4k TV so the lack of HDMI 2.0 in all of these cards is a deal breaker.
  • jjb8675309
    Absolutely no reason to buy these cards, not impressed at all, glad I snatched a slightly used gtx 970 a while ago.
  • ern88
    Why the hell would they drop only 2 gigs of ram in the 380's. That's just retarded. Hell my HD7950 has 3 gigs.
  • John Wittenberg
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Quote:
    Nice to see 980 Ti still stomps everything, glad I bought one... a wise investment!
    These are rebadge cards, their new cards are due out in days. Fanboy
    And exactly which ones will those be?


    The Fury X and the Fury X2 which are the new Fiji based cards with HBM. However, my understanding is that they won't be released to market until around September this year. Benchmarks show the Fury X often beating the 980 Ti, but the Fury X2 blows everything away due to it being a dual GPU card (that is still smaller than the 780 Ti/980 Ti - wowza).
  • tslot05qsljgo9ed
    Quote: The small Pitcairn-based graphics card manages to stay significantly under 150W. Average is 147.36 Watts

    How can you say 147.36 Watts is "significantly under 150W" with a straight face?

    That is only 2.64 wattls lower or 1.76% less. That in reality is NOT significantly lower.
  • FunSurfer
    How come the GTX 970 uses 168W on gaming and 243W on stress while the GTX 980 uses 185W on gaming and 177W on stress? 0_o