AMD Or Intel: Which $100 Gaming CPU Should You Buy?
Conclusion
Before we analyze the results, I think it's important to note that out of the nine games we tested, only two of them--Crysis and Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X.--demonstrated any notable performance decrease between 1280x1024 and 1920x1200. This is a real wake-up call to folks who believe that all modern games are limited only by the graphics hardware and that the CPU is almost irrelevant when it comes to gaming. Clearly, the benchmarks demonstrated that this isn't the case, and the CPU has a very significant impact on game performance.
Here we have the diluted percentages. What can we learn from them? Looking at this chart, we can see that the Athlon II X4 620 has achieved the highest average frame rates of all of our $100 CPUs. At the same time, even though the Phenom II X3 710 and Phenom II X2 550 aren't able to achieve the same lofty averages, their respective minimum frame rates are higher to the tune of roughly 10 percent--likely a result of faster stock clock rates.
A third factor, aside from minimum and average frame rates, and one not shown on this chart, are the multitasking benchmark results. The Athlon II X4 can run a processor-intensive task while gaming like a breeze. The Phenom II X3 has a tougher time and the Phenom II X2 and Pentium dual-core CPUs are absolutely crippled. If you don't think this is a realistic scenario, then think again. I can't even count the number of times I've stayed up late for a bout of Left 4 Dead, exited, and found my middle-of-the-night virus scan cranking along in the background.
Unfortunately for Intel, it looks like gamers building on a budget can skip over the dual-core Pentium E6500. While it certainly wasn't trounced in comparison to the other contenders, it really doesn't offer anything special. The processor might make a worthwhile upgrade from an older LGA 775-based configuration, but for those constructing new machines, the AM2+ and AM3 platforms are much more attractive and have a brighter future.
Are we recommending a specific $100 CPU? The results are too close to call between the AMD offerings, and we can say with confidence that any of these CPUs will provide excellent performance for the dollar spent. Multitaskers will want to look hard at the Athlon II X4 620, while those looking for consistency will be attracted to the Phenom II X3 710. Of course, overclockers will be drawn to the Phenom II X2 550 Black Edition. There's no right or wrong answer, and variety is the spice of life, so feel free to follow your desire. One thing that is for sure here: AMD is looking at too much inter-family competition, making it more difficult for value-oriented enthusiasts to pick the right part. We're sure AMD already knows this, and we expect the company to take measures to cut costs in the Phenom II class (likely starting with the low-margin X3). If an inexpensive Phenom II is what you're after, it's a safe bet that you'll want to buy it sooner than later.
One final factor we didn't have time to test this time around is overclocking. When overclocked, would the Phenom II 550 Black Edition become a monster? Would the dual-core Pentium E6500 pull a rabbit from its hat? Or would the Athlon II X4 620 and Phenom II X3 710 be able to hold on to their strengths? If this is something you'd like us to explore, please let us know in the comments section.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Conclusion
Prev Page Game Benchmarks: Game Multitasking And Power Consumption-
kenjiuchimura It's a shame there aren't more games that run like FO3 considering how gorgeous it is yet still being much more accessible based on its focus of CPU power instead of being topheavy on the GPU side.Reply -
FUtomNOreg If people have a delusion that games are not cpu constrained, it is because, if I recall, an article in Tom's made the assertion that any c2d >3GHz was sufficient.Reply -
curnel_D Don WoligroskiOne final factor we didn't have time to test this time around is overclocking. When overclocked, would the Phenom II 550 Black Edition become a monster? Would the dual-core Pentium E6500 pull a rabbit from its hat? Or would the Athlon II X4 620 and Phenom II X3 710 be able to hold on to their strengths? If this is something you'd like us to explore, please let us know in the comments section.Reply
OC potential is one of the most important factors in an article like this. If you can, most deff post an update soon. -
wintermint AMD is really evening the playing field with their low cost CPU :) but they should start challenging the Core i7 :(Reply -
siliconchampion I would have to say that overclocking results would be extremely useful. May I suggest that you run the same benchmarks again at two levels, the maximum overclock at stock voltage, and again with maximum stable overclock. Then compare the results to today's benches.Reply
I would have to agree with some of the poster's above that overclockability is a key factor in this price segment. -
curnel_D kenjiuchimuraIt's a shame there aren't more games that run like FO3 considering how gorgeous it is yet still being much more accessible based on its focus of CPU power instead of being topheavy on the GPU side.360 ports generally run really smooth on adequite PC hardware, simply because of the archetectual similarities. I personally dont think that FO3's graphic technology is all that great, but the art direction that Bethesda took made it a great looking game.Reply
Another game that does this really well is Operation Flashpoint 2. Technically speaking, the grapics arent that great. And I notice alot of places where textures and polys arent what they should be for a PC game. But aside from that, the game looks fantastic and runs very smooth even at the highest settings, and it all has to do with art, not technology. -
ohim TheCapuletThe Pentium DC can effortlesly overclock to 3.6, giving it a steep clock edge. And under good air cooling can easily hit the 4Ghz mark. With quality air cooling getting so cheap these days, it's not hard to imagine budget gamers buying great cooling while skimping on the processor budget because of overclocking. This article would have been perfect if it included the OC information and a few quick benchies to show the results. The OC potential makes ALL the difference in the world at this price point.First of all OC is out of the question here in this article since a 100$ CPU is clearly not for an enthusiast user (not even i with a PII 940 don`t use OC) , second OC`ing will only lead to huge power consumption fron the pc performance / watt will drop like hell.Reply -
mrsiberia I would love to see what impact OC has... Imo it's always interesting with budget hardware.Reply -
curnel_D wintermintWhich of the 4 CPU listed in the article is more future-proof?The AthalonII X4 would deffinately be the more futureproof of the four. Programs and games are rapidly being developed and upgraded to use 4+ threads. And when threaded applications finally hits mainstream, you'll appriciate those one or two cores a whole lot more. (Not to mention the platform itself lends itself to future upgrades a whole lot better than the 775 platform.)Reply -
tacoslave well amd always pwns on the lower end but what i want to see is them pull out a demon with shiny guns that can gut an i7 clean. then we can start the partying (and new systems)Reply