CompuLab Airtop Fanless PC First Look

Hands-On And First Impressions

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Derek Forrest was a contributing freelance writer for Tom's Hardware. He covered hardware news and reviews, focusing on gaming desktops and laptops.

  • Albert Rampo
    George Forman's pc of choice
    Reply
  • JQB45
    Its a nice piece of engineering. But not something I'd be willing to pay so much for.
    Reply
  • adgjlsfhk
    What I don't understand is the graphics card, cpu combo. You use a out of date processor because it has iris pro graphics, and then put a discrete graphics card in that is barely better. A skylake i5 + 960 would seem to make a lot more sense.
    Reply
  • JQB45
    18291480 said:
    What I don't understand is the graphics card, cpu combo. You use a out of date processor because it has iris pro graphics, and then put a discrete graphics card in that is barely better. A skylake i5 + 960 would seem to make a lot more sense.

    I was thinking the same thing.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    For all the pictures included, the view I really wanted to see was not shown. I want a top-down view of the thing, so I can see whether there are any vents in those doors. Otherwise, I'd congratulate them on making it vent-less.

    Underclocking a GTX 980 until it reaches the same thermals would be faster (though even more expensive). I suppose that's what the mobile version is (not the GTX 980M, but there's supposedly a mobile GTX 980).

    What really strikes me as odd is the decision to benchmark it against the i7-4790K. Since those buying something like this are placing a high premium on silence, at least try to pick a configuration that's more appropriate for a HTPC. Alternately, sticking with the same TDP and using an i5-6600 would've made sense. Were you guys just trying to make it look bad?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    18291480 said:
    What I don't understand is the graphics card, cpu combo. You use a out of date processor because it has iris pro graphics, and then put a discrete graphics card in that is barely better. A skylake i5 + 960 would seem to make a lot more sense.
    Since it sounds like they sell a version without the GTX 950, the Iris Pro graphics are important. Since Skylake and Broadwell have different sockets, it would be more expensive for them to design a different board just for those shipping with a discrete GPU.

    I think the main issue is that the GPU is underpowered. A higher-end mobile GPU would've provided more performance within their power envelope.
    Reply
  • JQB45
    There is not a huge performance boost switching from the NVidia GTX 950 to the NVidia GTX 980M.
    http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp%5B%5D=2976&cmp%5B%5D=2981&cmp%5B%5D=3295

    In fact my EVGA GTX 950 FTW at its stock overclock from the factory can beat a stock 980m in that benchmark, and it cost a lot less.
    You'll notice I included the 970m for comparison, and it doesn't stand a chance.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    18292087 said:
    In fact my EVGA GTX 950 FTW at its stock overclock from the factory can beat a stock 980m in that benchmark, and it cost a lot less.
    FTW card are clocked high, from the factory. What's the actual power consumption, under load? That's the issue. When you're TDP-constrained, you have to look at performance per Watt, and that's best accomplished with a big GPU running at a lower clockspeed.
    Reply
  • Kimonajane
    Pfft I will build my own i7-6700k about $600 less and run circles around this thing, wont hear any fan noise anyway while gaming.
    Reply
  • ubercake
    The fanless technology is neat, but I could never find it in my heart to shell out that much coin for something so weak.
    Reply