AMD FX Vs. Intel Core i3: Exploring Game Performance With Cheap GPUs

Page 7 of 9:

Benchmark Results: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Performance Target: 30 FPS Minimum

Between our first sub-$200 gaming CPU article and now, Bethesda released a Skyrim patch that greatly improves performance. This game was particularly processor-dependent last time. That's not so much the case now.

There’s almost no differentiation between CPUs. Average frame rates are dismal, though, so let’s see how these competing platforms fare when the settings are lowered to facilitate better performance.

Performance Target: 40 FPS Minimum, 60 FPS Average

Little changes until we install AMD's Radeon HD 6950. Suddenly, Intel's Core i3-2100 takes off with a notable lead. The FX-4100 delivers playable frame rates, but the Sandy Bridge-based CPU maintains a 10 FPS spread.

Current page: Benchmark Results: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim

Prev Page Benchmark Results: Metro 2033 Next Page Benchmark Results: StarCraft II

TOPICS

167 Comments Comment from the forums

ilysaml

Great...AMD is still capable.
Reply
reyshan

Whats with the line graph Don, it's hard to read especially with the choice of color on the lines. Bring back the bar graphs.:)
Reply
jjb8675309

This is a great article, Toms needs more budget rundowns like this and perhaps more games in the test sweet that exploit the cpu difference more...
Reply
compton

I think if you're really budget limited, but need to build a system today, buying 1155 makes a little more sense. Get a decent motherboard, then get an 1155 Celeron G530/540 or Pentium. Then save up some money, and upgrade to an Ivy Bridge CPU later. The i3 is great, but the i5s are a much better deal $/performance.

So if you need a new system and can't afford an i5, just buy a cheap 1155 SB as a placeholder until you can . Like the conclusion states, the upgrade path is there -- I just think that if it's a temporary step, you might as well save $60 to $80 if you're upgrading in the next 4 months anyway. You'd be surprised how fast the SB budget parts are, and they're fast enough to get you through till IB.

Reply
esrever

would be nice if more benchmarks were done, there are a lot of popular games that would be nice to test like civ 5, l4d2 or similar source game, mw3, SWTOR ect. Even if some of them aren't the most demanding games it would be nice to see them as they would be more relevant than dirt 3 or battlefield 3 single player.
Reply
jp182

esreverwould be nice if more benchmarks were done, there are a lot of popular games that would be nice to test like civ 5, l4d2 or similar source game, mw3, SWTOR ect. Even if some of them aren't the most demanding games it would be nice to see them as they would be more relevant than dirt 3 or battlefield 3 single player.
It would be nice if they through Civ 5 or MW3 in but at least on the FPS front, I think BF3 has a bigger following on the PC and the same thing goes for Skyrim. Not sure how many people are still playing Just Cause 2 though. In either case, I think this has more to do with being able to compare these results to the results from past benchmarks they've run.
Reply
manu 11

Thanks for appreciating our feedback, thank you very much. Great Article As always.
Reply
lemlo

9527590 said:
Whats with the line graph Don, it's hard to read especially with the choice of color on the lines. Bring back the bar graphs.:)

The line graph is better way to show it's behaviour over a period of time rather than a flat average, which doesn't explain frequent dips or long stretches of smooth gameplay in fps and such.

A very informative and realistic article, nice work Tom's. Lets hope AMD has something with piledriver.
Reply
amdfangirl

Sucks that the Core i3 can't be overclocked like the legendary e4xxx series or the e2160 which you could get a 100% OC with.

If DC Sandy Bridges could be unlocked, they would be so good for gaming.
Reply
erunion

Love the FPS graphed over time. Keep using them!
Reply

Show more comments