Temperature And Noise
We don't like to compare reference coolers to aftermarket solutions. Unfortunately, with no reference GeForce GTX 660 Ti to represent Nvidia's latest, that's the situation we're faced with today. Without question, MSI's Twin Frozr-equipped solution is heavily modified, so we don't have an apples-to-apples comparison versus AMD's (infamously bad) reference coolers. Fortunately, AMD's add-in board partners swap those out just as often as Nvidia's do.
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti puts up numbers that are very similar to AMD's reference Radeon HD 7870. In this case, the more aggressively-tuned card suffers the disadvantage, as MSI’s model is rated for up to 190 W instead of the base specification's 150 W ceiling.
There aren't many other surprises to point out, except the penalty suffered by the Radeon HD 7950 with its "GHz Edition" firmware. The power-hungry GeForce GTX 580 is less than impressive, too.
This is where we see AMD's reference cooler compare poorly to the cards from MSI, Gigabyte, and Zotac. You'll simply have to remember that, should you snag an AMD board with aftermarket cooling, it'll perform differently.
Again, AMD's fans underperform. We've seen in stories like Radeon HD 7950 3 GB: Six Cards, Benchmarked And Reviewed just how much impact a more thoughtful implementation can have on acoustics and thermal output.
Current page: Temperature And NoisePrev Page OpenCL: Video Processing (Basemark CL) Next Page GeForce GTX 660 Ti Is A $300 Contender Worth Considering
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Hmm. I have been wanting to replace my 560 - this throws a wrench in the gears. I was sold on a ASUS 670 but I think I'll wait to compare specs with their 660ti - I just started ripping my BD collection so the additional RAM bandwidth might be worth the extra $100 but it is still an interesting option.Reply
so, this is basically a card that costs 40$ less then a GTX 580, consumes 100W less power then a gtx 580 and its 8% better...hmm, intresting.Reply
*edit, costs 100$ less then GTX 580.Reply
That's strange - on techpowerup review the 660Ti is above 7950's average performance.Reply
game junkyI was sold on a ASUS 670 but I think I'll wait to compare specs with their 660ti.Asus' DCU2 Top ends up about 5% faster than stock, 8% slower than stock GTX 670 and still uses that excellent cooler.Reply
Still, the GTX 660Ti looks to be a decent card.
Not really fond of how nVidia keeps nerfing their memory bandwidth though.
Once prices drop a little, I could see it being an excellent mainstream card.
nice card, not OVERLY impressed...Reply
BUT THE PRICE...!
c'mon SON let's be real here......
ridiculous @ $300 beans..
waiting for a price cut down.who's with me?Reply
I have been holding to upgrade my GTX 460 256bits. I wonder if this card will be bottlenecked by my C2Q 9550 @ 3.6ghz....Reply
GPGPU = Kepler = FAIL....Reply
that's depressing but I understand nVidia has designated GTX 6 series as a gaming cards but c'mon SON.!!!
ridiculous once again..
Clearly we need more price cuts on the 660ti. I expect AMD to lower the prices even more, heck online retailers sell Radeon cards lower than the MSRP, making 7950 and 7870 even more budget friendly. It's still sad really to see mid-range cards battling at $300+. It used to be $250 and lowerReply