Gigabyte's 3D1: Are Two Engines Better Than One?
Features
By
Lars Weinand
published
Test Setup
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test System | |
---|---|
CPU | AMD Athlon64 4000+ |
FSB | 200 MHz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-K8NXP-SLI(nForce 4 SLI) |
Memory | 2x Corsair CMX-512-3200C2, 1024 MB |
HDD | Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 120 GB S-ATA (8 MB) |
DVD | Hitachi GD-7000 |
LAN | Netgear FA-312 |
Power Supply | Antec True Control 550W (ATX 1.0) |
Drivers & Configuration | |
Graphics | NVIDIA v71.20 |
Chipset | Intel Inf. Update |
OS | Windows XP Prof. SP1a |
DirectX | DirectX 9.0c |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark 2003 | Default Benchmark, 1024x768 & 1600x1200 (AA and AF by App) |
3DMark 2005 | Default Benchmark, (AA and AF by App) |
Unreal Tournament 2004 | Custom TimedemoMax Details/QualityMap : Assault-FallenCity(AA and AF forced by Driver) |
Doom3 | Demo : Demo1High Quality |
Farcry v1.3 | Custom Timedemo cooler01Very High QualityFlashlight : On |
Benchmarks
3D Mark 2003
3D Mark 2003
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
TOPICS
2 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
Shankovich So funny to look back now and see how abstract the concept of dual GPU design was back then. Happy to see my favorite mobo company be one of the pioneersReply