Gigabyte B650E Aorus Master Review: A PCIe 5.0 M.2 Party

Five PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets and 13 USB ports for $350

Gigabyte B650E Aorus Master
Editor's Choice
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Gigabyte’s B650E Aorus Master is an enticing option at the top of Gigabyte’s B650 motherboard stack, especially if you like fast internal storage. It comes with four PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets and loads of USB ports on the rear IO. It lacks 40 Gbps ports and the latest and greatest audio codec, but it is still one of the best Ryzen 7000 options in the $350 price range.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Four PCIe 5.0 M2 sockets

  • +

    13 USB ports on Rear IO

  • +

    M.2 and PCIe EZ-Latches

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Lacks 40 Gbps port(s)

  • -

    Last-gen audio codec

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The B650E Aorus Master is the flagship board from Gigabyte’s B650 lineup. Priced around $150 less than the X670E Aorus Master we reviewed previously, it still comes well equipped, with multiple PCIe 5.0 M.2 sockets, 13 USB ports (including 20 Gbps Type-C), last-gen flagship-class audio solution, overbuilt power delivery, and an appearance that looks more premium than the price. While it is missing 40 Gbps ports (a feature few B650 boards include), unless you require this feature, choosing a B650-based motherboard will save you a considerable amount of money compared to X670E models.

Gigabyte went all in on the B650 chipset, offering a total of 13 motherboards (compared to five X670) of varying sizes and prices. You’ll find all the familiar Aorus lines (Master, Elite, Ultra, and Pro) and a B650 Aero G for the Creators. There are also a couple of non-Aorus boards, namely the Gaming X and DS3H SKUs. With the sheer number in the product stack, there’s something for everyone, including MicroATX and Mini-ITX SKUs. Prices range from $159.99 (B650M DS3H) to $349.99 with the Aorus Master.

Joe Shields
Staff Writer, Components

Joe Shields is a staff writer at Tom’s Hardware. He reviews motherboards and PC components.

  • -Fran-
    Why are these morons trying to market these things up to the point where they put themselves out of the friggen' market! WHY?!

    All of that garbage in these motherboards is just not needed. Get rid of all that plastic, keep the same quality component and go a bit more barebones for the midrange chipset. We want cheap and functional, not stupid bling for parts which are meant to be cost effective. Yes, there's cheaper parts, but they not only cut trivial stuff; they also cut things that are actually good to have (WiFi+BT, audio codec, 10Gb LAN, etc).

    EDIT: Thanks for the review as well. I forgot to mention it!

    Regards >_<
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    Unfortunately bling sells. Some consumers are even swayed by the fancy box that the product comes in. I never could figure out how the box made the product perform any better... 😕
    Reply
  • mikeebb
    Yes, bling sells. But in most cases there's a "Pro" line or something similar that's plainer but with similar guts. Perhaps fewer USB ports (which can be a problem, e.g. I have a MSI Pro board that works great but has only 5 back-panel USB and 3 on-board headers for internal, which I have filled except for one USB C internal header and one USB C external (most of my add-ons are happy with USB 2)). But plain-vanilla doesn't check all the boxes for a magazine review; bling does.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Since reading a rant about massive VRMs os cultists network it's become a pet peeve of mine to spot these unnecessary additions. Mind you, I'm not so well versed in this subject; if someone can explain why I would need a 20 phase VRM I'd love to hear it.

    PS: Thanks for the review, I was wondering if you got some reviews for cheaper AM5 boards in the pipelines as well?
    Reply
  • Oldcompsci
    Why do motherboard makers keep wasting lanes on USB ports? Give us more x4 and x8 PCIe slots and we can expand the NVME solutions via vertical, vice horizontal, expansion options. I'd also like to see a revamp of SATA. Base it on USB 4.0 and make removable, hot swap, hard drives useful again.
    Reply
  • RichardtST
    I'll probably upgrade next year when the 3D CPU versions come out, but what I'd like to see is more love given to the NVME slots. I copy massive multi-hundred-gigabyte files around and can easily overheat them. I need more space for fancy-schmancy-oversized nvme coolers. I can't keep 'em cool when they're stuck under the graphics card.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    A B650 series motherboard that costs more than my X570S Aorus Master motherboard...Yeah, really makes me want to update to Socket AM5...
    Reply
  • Math Geek
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    A B650 series motherboard that costs more than my X570S Aorus Master motherboard...Yeah, really makes me want to update to Socket AM5...

    so you've clearly not been paying attention to anything since AM5 came out. ALL the AM5 boards are more expensive than their 4 and 500 series AM4 parts.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/why-amds-ryzen-7000-and-motherboards-cost-so-damn-much
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    A B650 series motherboard that costs more than my X570S Aorus Master motherboard...Yeah, really makes me want to update to Socket AM5...
    Compare these two:
    https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-rog-strix-x670e-e-gaming-wifi-socket-am5-ddr5-atx-motherboard-mb-6j5-as.html
    vs

    https://www.overclockers.co.uk/asus-rog-strix-z790-e-gaming-wifi-lga-1700-ddr5-atx-motherboard-mb-6jh-as.html

    The Z790 is more expensive and has worse features. I don't know if that's the rule of thumb, but I'm finding more and more examples of it. That's one aspect of why they're more expensive on the average, but I'm starting to doubt it's without reason on the chipset front. All the extra bling is still annoying and dislike getting charged for it.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • alceryes
    I didn't even know Tom's had a review on this board.
    After researching, this is the one I ended up with for my 7950X build. Truthfully, the BIOS was an unfinished mess out of the box. I had to do the no-CPU BIOS flashback to put the latest BIOS on to get it to post (memory used is on QVL). Once I got the latest BIOS on and tweaked settings to my liking it's been rock solid though.

    The 'Con' about a last-gen audio codec is misleading. The ALC1220 on this board has identical performance and fidelity to the ALC4082. The 4082 is NOT the successor to the 1220.
    Reply