Crucial m4 And Intel SSD 320: The Other SSD Competitors

Meet Crucial's m4, Micron's RealSSD C400

Crucial's m4: Not Old, Not New

Similar to the SSD 320-series, Crucial's newest drive is more of a refresh than a completely new product. These two product launches are really driven by the shift over to 25 nm NAND flash.

Beyond the rebranded name and memory, there isn't much difference between m4 and its predecessor (Crucial's RealSSD C300 review). The improved specs are primarily the result of the new 25 nm process. Sequential read performance sees a small bump up to 415 MB/s, while sequential write performance is now 260 MB/s. In comparison, random read performance has dropped to 40 000 IOPS, but random writes have increased to 50 000 IOPS.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Header Cell - Column 0 Crucial RealSSD C300 128 GBCrucial RealSSD C300 256 GBCrucial m4 128 GBCrucial m4 256 GB
Sequential ReadUp to 355 MB/sUp to 355 MB/sUp to 415 MB/sUp to 415 MB/s
Sequential WriteUp to 140 MB/sUp to 215 MB/sUp to 175 MB/sUp to 260 MB/s
4 KB Random ReadUp to 50 000 IOPSUp to 60 000 IOPSUp to 40 000 IOPSUp to 40 000 IOPS
4 KB Random WriteUp to 30 000 IOPSUp to 45 000 IOPSUp to 35 000 IOPSUp to 50 000 IOPS
Cache256 MB256 MB256 MB256 MB
NAND Flash Components34 nm MLC, ONFI 2.134 nm MLC, ONFI 2.125 nm MLC, ONFI 2.225 nm MLC, ONFI 2.2
Raw NAND128 GB256 GB128 GB256 GB
InterfaceSATA 6Gb/sSATA 6Gb/sSATA 6Gb/sSATA 6Gb/s

Inside Crucial's m4

Micron tells us this is the same Marvell 8SS9174 controller seen in Crucial’s C300, with a slight revision for ONFI 2.2 compatibility. Architecturally, nothing has changed. Even though the labels suggest three different generations, this is more a matter of firmware.

At the controller's core, there are two ARM9 processors which operate in tandem; one handles host request and other handles NAND requests. Some load balancing occurs when demand on one processor gets too high.

Micron has carried the massive 256 MB cache employed on the C300 over to the m4. Only the 64 GB models have 128 MB. The cache is used mostly for temporary functions, such as table mapping and write tracking. Whenever a write occurs, the controller performs a bit of cleanup to ensure there are enough clean blocks to prevent any performance slow-down, and when the drive sits idle, some garbage collection occurs. This functions independently of the OS, and it's a recipe that Micron believes best preserves performance.

We are still waiting on pricing information for the m4. We are told that the new drives won't be as expensive as the C300's launch prices, but that's fairly vague. The C300 hit the scene with a suggested price of $149.99 (64 GB model), $299.99 (128 GB model), and $599.99 (256 GB model). At close to $2.50 per gigabyte, it was a fair deal, but nothing we would get excited over. Today, the C300 hits close to $2 per gigabyte, and we are hoping the m4 introduces further drops to the C300's price.