Not All USB 3.0 Implementations Are Created Equal

Conclusion

You’d think that identical host controllers would provide similar performance, regardless of how they're implemented (or at least that motherboard vendors should achieve similar results by intelligently adding this functionality). However, existing USB 3.0 solutions vary for two possible reasons. There may be differences on the driver side, and performance depends a lot on how the controller is attached to the host system.

Stand-alone cards may be bottlenecked on older PCI Express systems, as well as practically all Intel machines that implement PCI Express 2.0 only on the graphics interfaces. In case you aren't up to speed on the situation there, the company's Lynnfield- and Clarkdale-based desktop processor employ an integrated PCI Express 2.0 controller limited to 16 lanes. The remaining connectivity comes from chipsets like P55 and H57, which run at PCIe 1.1 signaling rates, thereby handicapping performance.

USB 3.0 cards inserted into PCIe 1.1 slots might face throughput limits. However, this isn't always the case. We measured our lowest throughput of 113 MB/s on a Gigabyte P55A-UD6 with an onboard NEC USB 3.0 controller and the fastest throughput on the Asus Crosshair IV Formula using add-on PCIe 2.0 cards from Gigabyte and Western Digital. Combined read and write operations were fastest on stand-alone controllers with sufficient bandwidth, and on the Gigabyte P55A-UD7, which switches PCI Express resources.

In the end, we can’t speak for or against PCI Express 2.0 add-on cards for USB 3.0. They all deliver sufficient performance for today’s devices, such as Super Talent's RAIDDrive. Yet, we strongly recommend operating these in true PCI Express 2.0 slots for maximum performance. If you want a motherboard with an integrated USB 3.0 controller, you should definitely consider product reviews that include USB 3.0 performance evaluation, given that seemingly-similar products, such as Gigabyte's P55A-UD6 and -UD7, deliver markedly different results.

We also found no reason to shy away from a USB 3.0 hard drive and controller bundle, such as WD’s MyBook 3.0. So far, all USB 3.0 products are based on the NEC controller, and none of them are bad.

Latest in USB
Sanwa Supply Rotatable USB C cable
Japanese company makes $16 USB-C cable that rotates 360 degrees — cable is approximately 3 feet long and offers 240W power delivery and USB 2.0 transfer speeds
Elecom USB 80 Gbps Cable
Elecom intros pair of USB 80 Gbps cables, one with 60W PD and another with 240W PD
Heat It Type C Dongle that provides relieve via heat for mosquito/ horsefly bites and wasp stings
This USB Type-C dongle uses heat to relieve mosquito bites
USB 80 Gbps Logos
USB 4's 80 Gbps Spec Released Alongside New Logos
USB Explainer
USB Decoded: All the Specs and Version Numbers
USB 3.2 Gen 2 and Gen 1
USB 3.2 and 3.1 Explained: What's Gen 1, Gen 2 and Gen 2x2?
Latest in Features
Free Alternatives to Photoshop
Five Best Photoshop Alternatives Tested: Image Editing for Free
Awekeys Antiques Metal keycaps
Awekeys Antiques Metal keycaps are Viking-themed luxury for your fingertips
The Gigabyte X870E AORUS ELITE WIFI7
Get the most out of your processor with this motherboard's Turbo Mode
AMD RDNA 4 and Radeon RX 9000-series GPUs
AMD RDNA 4 and Radeon RX 9000-series GPUs start at $549: Specifications, release date, pricing, and more revealed
MSI Prestige GPU
Tested: Intel's Arrow Lake 140T iGPU mostly maintains an edge over AMD's older 880m
MechBoards Hyper7 R4
I’m typing this on the world’s largest keyboard, a 178-key beast designed to make you more productive