Not All USB 3.0 Implementations Are Created Equal
Despite the fact that today's USB 3.0 products center on the same NEC controller, we compared a handful of different USB 3.0 drives and found performance to range from 113 to 173 MB/s, depending on the implementation used. Should you be worried?
Benchmark Results: I/O Performance
For some reason, the two Gigabyte platforms aren't a good fit for the Western Digital add-on card in our file server test. Both boards deliver significantly lower I/O results with this card.
The integrated Gigabyte solutions aren’t optimal for Web server solutions. The add-on cards are better for this purpose.
In the workstation result, we found the opposite of the file server results: the WD controller on the Gigabyte motherboards is best here, showing that performance may vary quite a bit depending on the type of workload.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: I/O Performance
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Access Time Next Page ConclusionIntel 13th and 14th Gen 'Raptor Lake' instability troubles: Everything you need to know
Nvidia RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU specs revealed and it's as bad as expected — comes with just 1,768 CUDA cores and 4GB VRAM on a 64-bit bus
Intel 13th Gen CPUs allegedly have 4X higher return rate than the prior gen — retailer stats also claim Intel CPU RMAs are higher than AMD