Skip to main content

Nvidia's SLI Technology In 2015: What You Need To Know

SLI And Virtual Reality Applications

A word of warning is in order if you're using an Oculus Development Kit 2, or are planning to purchase the Oculus Rift once it is released (it's rumored to be coming in late 2015). Virtual reality headsets, by nature, rely on the lowest possible level of latency between head movements and display updates. Anything else can result in uncomfortable motion sickness-type reactions.

Nvidia recently introduced a "Virtual Reality pre-rendered frames" setting in its Control Panel (with a default setting of "1") to help reduce latency to its lowest level possible. Unfortunately, this setting does not apply to SLI; it only affects single GPUs. Because of the way SLI works, the CPU needs to pre-render at least two frames at any given point in time for a measurable performance benefit.

Nvidia's "Virtual Reality pre-rendered frames" setting does not apply to SLI

The Oculus DK2 supports refresh rates no higher than 75Hz. That means the minimum displayable frame time with v-sync is 13.3 milliseconds. Pre-rendering an extra frame from the CPU results in an additional latency of the same amount, which sounds small but is actually quite significant to VR.

Note: Without delving into a rather complex discussion of why v-sync is essentially necessary to VR, or debunking the common "v-sync is evil" attitude in the desktop gaming space, trust us on this one. You'll want v-sync on in your VR applications.

In situations where your game cannot be rendered at a constant 75 FPS, having SLI enabled will help. A frame pre-rendering delay is always desirable over the stuttering caused by having v-sync enabled and "missing" a frame refresh, thus showing the previous frame again.

The Crescent Bay prototype from Oculus is rumored to be a 90 Hz, 1440p device

Furthermore, if the latest Crescent Bay prototype from Oculus is any indication of where the consumer version is headed, maintaining a 90Hz (90 FPS) frame rate at 1280x1440 per eye with v-sync enabled may in fact require two cards in SLI. In that case, the minimum displayable frame time with v-sync is reduced to 11.1 milliseconds, which is certainly an improvement.

In short, SLI is neither required nor necessarily desirable for the current DK2 version of the Rift. But it might actually be helpful for an ideal experience once the final consumer version is introduced, particularly if you want to play with the eye candy turned up in current-generation games. If you're shooting for the absolute lowest possible latency, however, you'll want instead to drop your detail settings and go with a single GPU.

  • PaulBags
    Nice article. Looking foreward to comparing to a dx12+sli article when it happens, see how much it changes the sli game since cpu's will be less likely to bottlneck.

    Do you think we'd see 1080p monitors with 200hz+ in the future? Would it even make a difference to the human eye?
    Reply
  • none12345
    They really need to redesign the way multigpu works. Something is really wrong when 2+ gpus dont work half the time, or have higher latency then 1 gpu. That fact that this has persisted for like 15 years now is an utter shame. SLI profiles and all the bugs and bs that comes with SLI needs to be fixed. A game shouldnt even be able to tell how many gpus there are, and it certainly shouldnt be buggy on 2+ gpus but not on 1.

    I also believe that alternating frames is utter crap. The fact that this has become the go to standard is a travesty. I dont care for fake fps, at the expense of consistent frames, or increased latency. If one card produces 60fps in a game. I would much rather have 2 cards produce 90fps and both of them work on the same frame at the same time, then for 2 cards to produce 120 fps alternating frames.

    The only time 2 gpus should not be working on the same frame, is 3d or vr, where you need 2 angles of the same scene generated each frame. Then ya, have the cards work seperatly on their own perspective of the scene.
    Reply
  • PaulBags
    Considering dx12 with optimised command queues & proper cpu scaling is still to come later in the year, I'd hate to imagine how long until drivers are universal & unambiguous to sli.
    Reply
  • cats_Paw
    The article is very nice.
    However, If i need to buy 2 980s to run a VR set or a 4K display Ill just wait till the prices are more mainstream.
    I mean, in order to have a good SLI 980 rig you need a lot of spare cash, not to mention buying a 4K display (those that are actually any good cost a fortune), a CPU that wont bottleneck the GPUs, etc...

    Too rich for my blood, Id rather stay on 1080p, untill those technologies are not only proven to be the next standard, but content is widely available.

    For me, the right moment to upgrade my Q6600 will be after DX12 comes out, so I can see real performance tests on new platforms.
    Reply
  • Luay
    I thought 2K (1440P) resolutions were enough to take a load off an i5 and put it into two high-end maxwell cards in SLI, and now you show that the i7 is bottle-necking at that resolution??

    I had my eye on the two Acer monitors, the curved 34" 21:9 75Hz IPS, and the 27" 144HZ IPS, either one really for a future build but this piece of info tells me my i5 will be a problem.

    Could it be that Intel CPUs are stagnated in performance compared to GPUs, due to lack of competition?

    Is there a way around this bottleneck at 1440P? Overclocking or upgrading to Haswell-E or waiting for Sky-lake?
    Reply
  • loki1944
    Really wish they would have made 4GB 780Tis, the overclock on those 980s is 370Mhz higher core clock and 337Mhz higher memory clock than my 780Tis and barely beats them in Firestrike by a measly 888 points. While SLI is great 99% of the time there are still AAA games out there that don't work with it, or worse, are better off disabling SLI, such as Watchdogs and Warband. I would definitely be interested in a dual gpu Titan X card or even 980 (less interested in the latter) because right now my Nvidia options for SLI on a mATX single PCIE slot board is limited to the scarce and overpriced Titan Z or the underwhelming Mars 760X2.
    Reply
  • baracubra
    I feel like it would be beneficial to clarify on the statement that "you really need two *identical* cards to run in SLI."

    While true from a certain perspective, it should be clarified that you need 2 of the same number designation. As in two 980's or two 970's. I fear that new system builders will hold off from going SLI because they can't find the same *brand* of card or think they can't mix an OC 970 with a stock 970 (you can, but they will perform at the lower card's level).

    PS. I run two 670's just fine (one stock EVGA and one OC Zotac)
    Reply
  • jtd871
    I'd have appreciated a bit of the in-depth "how" rather than the "what". For example, some discussion about multi-GPU needing a separate physical bridge and/or communicating via the PCIe lanes, and the limitations of each method (theoretical and practical bandwidth and how likely this channel is to be saturated depending on resolution or workload). I know that it would take some effort, but has anybody ever hacked a SLI bridge to observe the actual traffic load (similar to your custom PCIe riser to measure power)? It's flattering that you assume knowledge on the part of your audience, but some basic information would have made this piece more well-rounded and foundational for your upcoming comparison with AMDs performance and implementation.
    Reply
  • illimors
    Great article!
    Reply
  • mechan
    I feel like it would be beneficial to clarify on the statement that "you really need two *identical* cards to run in SLI."

    While true from a certain perspective, it should be clarified that you need 2 of the same number designation. As in two 980's or two 970's. I fear that new system builders will hold off from going SLI because they can't find the same *brand* of card or think they can't mix an OC 970 with a stock 970 (you can, but they will perform at the lower card's level).

    PS. I run two 670's just fine (one stock EVGA and one OC Zotac)

    What you say -was- true with 6xx class cards. With 9xx class cards, requirements for the cards to be identical have become much more stringent!
    Reply