Page 1:Does it Make Sense To Go for Maximum Performance?
Page 2:Hardware: Core i7 920, Asus X58, Corsair DDR3
Page 3:Overclocking Choices And Details
Page 4:From 2.66 To 4.0 GHz
Page 5:Test System
Page 6:Benchmark Results: Games
Page 7:Benchmark Results: PCMark & 3DMark Vantage
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Applications
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Audio/Video
Page 10:Idle/Peak Power Consumption Analysis
Page 11:Average And Total Power During PCMark
Page 12:Efficiency Results
We related the PCMark Vantage score to the power in watt-hours that it took to complete the workload. Here are the results, normalized to the 2.66 GHz stock speed:
|Core i7 920 (2.66 GHz)||Efficiency Change|
The 3.66 GHz setting offers the best increase in performance per watt-hour for the PCMark Vantage benchmark. Running the CPU at 4.0 GHz actually decreased energy efficiency by 17%, as it requires much more power without delivering a substantial performance benefit.
This diagram visualizes the efficiency with increasing clock speed, and shows impressively that the 3.66 GHz setting provides the best performance per watt for this particular workload. Despite being a synthetic benchmark, this is not too far off for intensive operation.
Finally, we don’t want to conclude without the power diagram for the different configurations in PCMark Vantage. Very obviously, the 4 GHz setting requires most power.
- Does it Make Sense To Go for Maximum Performance?
- Hardware: Core i7 920, Asus X58, Corsair DDR3
- Overclocking Choices And Details
- From 2.66 To 4.0 GHz
- Test System
- Benchmark Results: Games
- Benchmark Results: PCMark & 3DMark Vantage
- Benchmark Results: Applications
- Benchmark Results: Audio/Video
- Idle/Peak Power Consumption Analysis
- Average And Total Power During PCMark
- Efficiency Results