AMD Radeon HD 6990 4 GB Review: Antilles Makes (Too Much) Noise
Several months late and supposedly only a couple of weeks ahead of Nvidia's own dual-GPU flagship launch, AMD's Radeon HD 6990 has no trouble establishing performance superiority. But does speed at any cost sacrifice too much of the user experience?
Benchmark Results: Quad-CrossFire!
Although we only have one Radeon HD 6990 in the lab, I was able to enlist the help of someone with two—someone who could test the mettle of four Cayman GPUs running cooperatively. He didn’t have the same benchmarks I typically run, but the following tests still showcase the potential of two boards.
Consider this an exhibition for now; until we’re able to test two 6990s in a case—any case, given the lack of specific guidance from AMD—it’s impossible to say how viable a pair of cards under load can actually be. We do know he measured 869 W of system power using the stock BIOS and 987 W with the overclocked firmware (that's two cards and a 5 GHz overclocked Sandy Bridge-based platform).
Crysis? Very high quality settings? 2560x1600 with 4x AA? More than 60 frames per second? Yeah, we’ve finally seen it all.
Far Cry 2 shows us that there is such a thing as too much graphics horsepower if your display configuration isn’t elaborate enough. Not even anti-aliasing can slow down two 6990s working cooperatively.
The only chart I didn’t include here was Resident Evil 5, which shows that AMD’s driver isn’t necessarily optimized for four-way CrossFire yet; there’s no scaling moving from one card to two.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Quad-CrossFire!
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Dual-GPU Performance (CrossFire And SLI) Next Page The Big Reveal: Power And Noise-
CrazeEAdrian Great job AMD. You need to expect noise and heat when dealing with a card that beasts out that kind of performance, it's part of the territory.Reply -
jprahman This thing is a monster, 375W TDP, 4GB of VRAM! Some people don't even have 4GB of regular RAM in their systems, let alone on their video card.Reply -
one-shot Did I miss the load power draw? I just noticed the idle and noise ratings. It would be informative to see the power draw of Crossfire 6990s and overclocked i7. I see the graph, but a chart with CPU only and GPU only followed by a combination of both would be nice to see.Reply -
anacandor For the people that actually buy this card, i'm sure they'll be able to afford an aftermarket cooler for this thing once they come out...Reply -
cangelini one-shotDid I miss the load power draw? I just noticed the idle and noise ratings. It would be informative to see the power draw of Crossfire 6990s and overclocked i7. I see the graph, but a chart with CPU only and GPU only followed by a combination of both would be nice to see.Reply
We don't have two cards here to test, unfortunately. The logged load results for a single card are on the same page, though! -
bombat1994 things we need to see are this thing water cooled.Reply
and tested at 7680 x 1600
that will see just how well it does.
That thing is an absolute monster of a card.
They really should have made it 32nm. then the power draw would have fallen below 300w and the thing would be cooler.
STILL NICE WORK AMD -
Bigmac80 Pretty fast i wonder if this will be cheaper then 2 GTX 570's or 2 6950's?Reply
But omg this thing is freakin loud. What's the point of having a quite system now with Noctua fans :(