Samsung Odyssey OLED G8 Gaming Monitor Review: High-Performance Gaming With Smart TV

A 34-inch Ultra-Wide OLED WQHD curved gaming monitor with 175 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR, wide gamut color and Smart TV streaming.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G8
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Our HDR benchmarking uses Portrait Displays’ Calman software. To learn about our HDR testing, see our breakdown of how we test PC monitors.

The OLED G8 supports both HDR10 and HDR10+ formats. The latter requires correctly encoded content with dynamic metadata. The mode switch happens automatically and if you set Color Space to Auto, the gamut will change between sRGB and DCI-P3 accordingly.

HDR Brightness and Contrast 

The OLED G8 does not vary brightness in HDR mode so its peak of 446 nits is the same when measuring either full field or window patterns. The Corsair and Alienware screens top 1,000 nits by increasing output to small areas of the screen only. The black level is unmeasurable in any case which renders contrast infinite. The Philips is a notable exception in the OLED category in that it doesn’t completely shut off the screen when a black field pattern is displayed. The G8, like every OLED, has superb HDR thanks to its high native contrast.

Grayscale, EOTF and Color 

When I applied an HDR10 signal through the G8’s HDMI port, it gave me the choice of two picture modes, Standard and Movie. Standard has spot-on grayscale tracking but its luminance tracking is quite far off the mark. It is much too light from 10% brightness up to the tone-map transition point at 65%. This means most areas of the image will look washed out and flat. Dark material won’t render a true black.

Luckily, the Movie mode is much better. It has the same accurate grayscale tracking along with near perfect luminance tracking. The picture here is true to the original content and is the optimal way to enjoy the OLED G8’s HDR quality.

In the gamut tests, I’m only showing the Movie mode. You just don’t want to use Standard; trust me, it won’t do the OLED G8 justice. Color saturation tracks almost perfectly on-target when measured against the DCI-P3 reference which is the basis for much of today’s HDR content. Hue errors are minimal, and the gamut is fully covered to 100% saturation. The Rec.2020 chart tracks its color targets until the OLED G8 runs out of color at around 85%. This is about as good as it gets for any wide gamut display.

Test Takeaway: The OLED G8 has superlative HDR quality that is on par with other OLEDs I’ve reviewed. With its huge gamut, it is only matched by the Philips 34M2C8600 for total volume making it one of the most colorful monitors available. It also delivers reference level accuracy for grayscale, EOTF and gamut as long as you choose the Movie mode.

Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

  • johnnobts
    Actually you made a mistake, it uses an HDMI MICRO Input so you need an HDMI micro cable or adapter. Not mini. You should correct that.
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    for that price and samsung Is a BIG NO!
    Reply
  • MoxNix
    Pretty low refresh rate for such an expensive "gaming" monitor. Should be at least 240 Hz and even then it'd be expensive.
    Reply
  • Unolocogringo
    Nothing new.
    I have a 20" Syncmaster monitor in the bedroom of the RV . Nice monitor with a TV tuner and speakers.
    Reply
  • kiniku
    Wow. This review is so way off. I've owned this monitor for several months and it has problems that Samsung has or is still working on to correct.
    1) Putting the monitor into "movie mode", actually called "entertain" mode disables its "game mode" which in turn disables HDR, "adaptive sync", and lowers the max FPS to a maximum of 120.
    2) This monitor also has some compatibility issues with GPU's ports. Both HDMI and DP. The problem is when you power down your PC and the monitor goes into standby mode, it has to be powered up manually with its remote each time you power up your PC.

    This monitor shines on being a standalone entertainment streaming device. But it has some issues trying to act like a simple PC monitor. I'd get the Alienware versions.

    Maybe the reviewer has an updated firmware version I don't...yet. But I check daily.

    By the way, when it is configured correctly this OLED monitor is amazing in gaming. And for the record, none of the above holds a candle to its color depth and image quality in gaming. You'll see HDR as it is meant to be. You can verify that by searching for and reading other reviews on this monitor. This panel, Alienware, Samsung, MSI is in a league of its own.
    Reply
  • Oli Baba
    Hm... nothing about the sub-pixel layout? Has it got the same color fringing issues with text as the Alienware displays?
    Reply
  • RobboSayThisIsComplicated
    The fact this has no audio out is pretty rubbish. I've got a 2013 TV with a headphone/AUX out that I use with a couple of good flat studio monitors & a sub via miniDSP, so a TV without any audio out capabilities is a bit rubbish in 2023, but I guess the picture's good!
    Reply
  • hasten
    I hate these combo platter all in one devices for $1k+. One of the biggest mistakes Ive recently made is get 2 x G70B IPS with a variation of this horrific OS underlying. The monitors are great, designer wife uses them as flanking monitors. But... If you want updates consent to screen scrapes. Any other samsung controller around? They seem to all work on these, especially when you dont want it. Convoluted menus are terrible using the on display controls.

    You may ask why not use the controller? Well with two monitors that respond to any samsung remote command... better hope the actual panels are identical when calibrating or you're using on display controls... no turning remotes off as far as I can tell. It seems to me that these one product for everything devices are better suited for entry-mid level monitors. People that may not be able to afford multiple devices or want to spend the money on a highend monitor seem like the target demo. It just feels like a TV with some monitor functionality built in.

    Sorry, rant over - I honestly was working on her setup and wanted to destory both of the G70B's moments before I saw this.
    Reply
  • wbfox
    Unless you are able to personally inspect and purchase ocean front property in Arizona, never, ever, ever, buy anything from Samsung that is dependent upon whatever new and totally unique slapped together and soon neglected software that gets haphazardly shoved up their display products. They may make good hardware, but they do not put any effort into the software side. Except for the parts that report back your tv usage. Not sure I want to know what they report back when it comes to something specifically designed to be hooked up to your computer.
    Reply
  • dontoro
    MoxNix said:
    Pretty low refresh rate for such an expensive "gaming" monitor. Should be at least 240 Hz and even then it'd be expensive.
    In my opinion, 175 Hz is enough for a gaming monitor. Keep in mind that to get 3D rendering that can handle 240 Hz requires a very expensive video card, and it is not a given that you will get the highest quality with some games.
    So 240 Hz is wasted if you want to aim for rendering quality unless you practice esports where response/latency is important, and not visual quality.
    People who buy this monitor I think want to have better visual quality.
    Reply