Scythe Fuma 3 Review: Compact Profile, Big Cooler Bite

Scythe Fuma 3
Editor's Choice
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Scythe’s Fuma 3 improves upon earlier revisions, offering strong compact air cooling performance with a value-oriented price of $49.99.

Pros

  • +

    Designed with SFF systems in mind

  • +

    Full RAM clearance

  • +

    Competitive with high-end air coolers

  • +

    $49.99 MSRP

Cons

  • -

    Some larger, pricier alternatives perform better

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Unlike some of its cooler competitors, Chiba Japan-based Scythe is a fabless company that partners with factories in China and Taiwan for manufacturing of its air coolers, fans and other PC hardware. The company has been delivering cooling products aimed largely at quiet performance for more than 20 years. 

Today we’ll be looking at Scythe’s successor to their very successful Fuma 2 air cooler, the Fuma 3. Will the improvements made by Scythe work well enough for it to earn a spot on our best coolers list? We’ll have to test it to be sure, but first lets look at this product’s specifications.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CoolerScythe Fuma 3
MSRP$49.99USD
Installed Size138 (W) x 128 (D) x 154 mm (H)
Heatsink MaterialAluminum
Heatpipes6x Plated Copper Heatpipes
Socket CompatibilityIntel Socket LGA 1700/1200/115x/2066/2011(v3) AMD AM5 / AM4
BaseNickel plated Copper
Max TDP (Our Testing)227W on Intel i7-13700K, 124W on AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Swipe to scroll horizontally
ModelScythe Kaze Flex II/Scythe Kaze Flex II Slim
Dimensions120 x 120 x 26 mm/120 x 120 x 15mm
Fan SpeedUp to 1500 RPM +- 10%
Air FlowUp to 67.62/39.44 CFM
Air PressureUp to 0.96/1.5 mmH2O
Bearing TypeFluid Dynamic Bearing
LightingNone
MFFT120,000 hours
Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPUIntel Core i7-13700K
Comparison Coolers TestedBeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 Cooler Master Master Air MA824 Stealth Cooler Master Hyper 622 Halo Cooler Master Master Liquid Core 360L Cougar Forza 85 Essential DeepCool Assassin IV DeepCool LT720 EKWB Nucleus CR360 Lux Jiushark JF13K Diamond Lian Li GA II Performance Thermalright Silver Soul 135 Thermalright Peerless Assassin Montech D24 Premium MSI CoreLiquid MEG S360 Noctua NH-D15S
MotherboardMSI Z690 A Pro DDR4
GPUIntel ARC A770 LE
CaseBe Quiet! Silent Base 802, system fans set to speed 1 setting.
MonitorLG 45GR95QE
PSUCooler Master XG Plus 850 Platinum PSU
Swipe to scroll horizontally
CPUAMD Ryzen 7 7700X
MotherboardASRock B650E Taichi
GPUIntel ARC A770 LE
CaseDeepCool CK560WH
MonitorLG 45GR95QE
PSUCougar Polar X2 1200W
TOPICS
Albert Thomas
Freelancer, CPU Cooling Reviewer

Albert Thomas is a contributor for Tom’s Hardware, primarily covering CPU cooling reviews.

  • Udyr

    Cons- Some larger, pricier alternatives perform better
    Instead of this, maybe a different wording? Something like: for X price increase you get Y% better cooling?
    Reply
  • kano1337
    Why the cooling capacity is much lower on recent AMD models than the Intel ones?
    I have seen this multiple times, but do not know the reasons
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    kano1337 said:
    Why the cooling capacity is much lower on recent AMD models than the Intel ones?
    I have seen this multiple times, but do not know the reasons
    You can't compare the cooling capacity on Ryzen 7 7700X to that of Intel i7-13700K, the reason I use these two CPUs is to see how different processors can be impacted by cooling.

    The 7700X uses less power, but it has a higher thermal density. If you were gonna try to compare Intel to AMD more closely here, you'd need to at least use a 7900X instead.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    Udyr said:
    Instead of this, maybe a different wording? Something like: for X price increase you get Y% better cooling?
    We have to list a "con" for our articles.

    Personally, I don't feel that there really are any "cons" for this product.
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    with max turbo TDP of 253 watts for intel , I think that air cooling is not an option anymore for intel unless you are willing to sacrifice alot of performance , and thats before any OC.
    Reply
  • Albert.Thomas
    newtechldtech said:
    with max turbo TDP of 253 watts for intel , I think that air cooling is not an option anymore for intel unless you are willing to sacrifice alot of performance , and thats before any OC.
    Both AMD and Intel CPUs will hit TJMax in maximum intensity workloads, and neither loses a lot of performance with air cooling. Really - unless you're using a tiny SFF cooler, the performance difference will be small in heavy loads like rendering and non-existent in most common workloads.

    In this author's personal opinion overclocking is mostly pointless on most modern CPUs unless you're willing to delid your CPU.
    Reply