USB 3.1 Tested: Performance On MSI's X99A Gaming 9 ACK

Hands-On With USB 3.1

Each year, we make our pilgrimage to Las Vegas, Nevada for the Consumer Electronics Show. And each year, we’re bombarded with technologies, architectures, mock-ups unlikely to appear on store shelves and products that started selling six months ago.

Our meetings go on for a week straight. When they're all said and done, our heads are crammed full of specs and launch dates. Truly, only the most special devices elicit an, “Oh yeah—I remember that!” But I believe the great volume of writing already devoted to USB 3.1 demonstrates the tech press’ unanimous recognition of a standard you’re bound to encounter sooner or later.

ASMedia's ASM1352R-equipped development board

Maybe you didn’t realize it’d be this soon, though. During the show, USB 3.1 was on display using ASMedia’s ASM1142 PCIe-to-two-port USB 3.1 controller and ASM1352R USB 3.1-to-SATA 6Gb/s developer board. We got our hands on the demo hardware needed to test the standard’s early performance.

Testing USB 3.1: The Hardware

The ASM1142 is integrated onto MSI’s X99A Gaming 9 ACK motherboard. As far as we know, this will be the first platform armed with ASMedia’s latest, exposing two Type A ports on the I/O panel. As a chipset, X99 didn’t offer much in the way of innovation, so add-in extras like the ASM1142 go a long way in giving high-end systems some degree of differentiation beyond the usual bundled Wi-Fi, PCIe switches and overclocking aids.

MSI's X99A Gaming 9 ACK, expected to launch in Q1'15

MSI says the controller is attached to the PCH via two lanes of second-gen PCI Express, yielding up to 1GB/s of peak throughput. Yes, there are several peripheral configurations that’d result in contention for the Platform Controller Hub's available resources. X99 exposes 10 SATA 6Gb/s ports, six USB 3.0 ports and gigabit Ethernet natively, all behind a four-lane DMI 2.0 pathway to the host processor. It’s not difficult to jam up…if you try. This first implementation of USB 3.1 is storage-oriented though, and in applications where you’re moving lots of information to or from an external drive, it’s unlikely that other subsystems are getting hammered.

A cable connects the developer board through its Micro-B jack. Notice the lack of reversible Type-C ports in this equation. Although Type-C is commonly associated with USB 3.1, it isn’t necessary in order to realize the standard’s performance benefits, just as the presence of Type-C doesn’t automatically indicate USB 3.1 transfer rates.

The developer board is a straightforward affair, consisting of ASMedia’s ASM1352R controller, two SATA connectors, power input and a handful of jumpers. We’re attaching a pair of 480GB Intel SSD 730 drives, which get striped and formatted at the push of a button.

The Experiment

We’re exploring performance on three fronts today. First, we’ll use the ASMedia development board with the two Intel SSD 730 drives in a striped array, comparing transfer rates of ASMedia’s controller against Intel’s native USB 3.0 interface and a VIA Labs add-in controller also present on the X99A Gaming 9 ACK motherboard.

Patriot's Supersonic Magnum is rated for up to 260MB/s reads and 160MB/s writes

Then, we’ll add numbers using one of the fastest USB 3.0-capable thumb drives you can buy to see if the new standard offers any benefit to those of you with current-gen USB hardware. The final test will compare CPU utilization during file transfers to gauge whether USB 3.1's greater throughput is any more or less compute-intensive than USB 3.0.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Test Hardware
ProcessorsIntel Core i7-5930K (Haswell-E) Six cores, 3.5GHz (35 * 100 MHz), LGA 2011-v3, 15MB Shared L3 Cache, Hyper-Threading enabled, Turbo Boost enabled, Power-savings disabled
MotherboardMSI X99A Gaming 9 ACK (LGA 2011-v3) Intel X99 Express, BIOS 2.2
MemoryCrucial 16GB (4 x 4GB) DDR4-2400, BLS4K4G4D240FSA @ DDR3-1866 at 1.2V
Row 3 - Cell 0 Corsair 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3-2133, Engineering Sample @ DDR3-1866 at 1.2V
Hard DriveSamsung 840 Pro 256 GB, SATA 6 Gb/s
GraphicsNvidia GeForce GTX 780 3GB
Power SupplyCorsair AX860i, 80 PLUS Platinum, 860W
Heat SinkNoctua NH-D15
USB 3.1 PlatformASMedia Development Board, ASM1352R USB 3.1 to SATA 6Gb/s Controller, 2 x 480GB Intel SSD 730
USB 3.0 Thumb DrivePatriot Supersonic Magnum 256GB (USB 3.0)
System Software And Drivers
Operating SystemWindows 8.1 Professional x64
DirectXDirectX 11
Graphics DriverNvidia GeForce Release 340.52
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Benchmark Configuration
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.3bSequential Read/Write, Random 4KB Read/Write (QD=1)
Windows CopyReal-World Read/Write Benchmark (36.7GB, 91 Files in 27 Folders)
Chris Angelini
Chris Angelini is an Editor Emeritus at Tom's Hardware US. He edits hardware reviews and covers high-profile CPU and GPU launches.
  • Tom Delco
    I remember when Thomas Pabst, founder of, called USB the "useless serial bus!" Man, was he wrong. Some guys have no vision!
    Tom DelConte
  • Eggz
    Always stoked for better interfaces. As the wise Kool-Aid Man would say, "Oooooh yeah!"
  • jtd871
    Would it kill you to use consistent units for reporting results?! The 1st two charts on page 2 are MB/s while the third is time (seconds). I understand that it's easier to report the time for the file copy, but it wouldn't have been too difficult to calculate and report an approximate average transfer rate.
  • qlum
    I think getting a faster usb3.1 port in the rear while having 3 sets of similar looking ports with different speeds is bound to cause confusion so unless you permanently have a fast device plugged into the fastest point Id say its a waste. Personally I use 1/2 usb 3 devices max and usually in the front which I regularly switch out so really quite useless in most cases.
  • razor512
    When are going to see USB 3.1 external 3.5 inch floppy drives? :)
  • RedJaron
    15111483 said:
    When are going to see USB 3.1 external 3.5 inch floppy drives? :)
    I'd say they'll come about the same time we get Firewire ZIP disk drives.
  • dstarr3
    Does USB 3.1 address the issue that 3.0 has with wireless receiver interference?
  • SteelCity1981
    usb 3.1 will be a slow adaption. heck usb 2.0 still floods the market let alone usb 3.0. it's been what in the past year that we are finally starting to se usb 30 start to become the norm in devices now????
  • RedJaron
    15113368 said:
    usb 3.1 will be a slow adaption. heck usb 2.0 still floods the market let alone usb 3.0. it's been what in the past year that we are finally starting to se usb 30 start to become the norm in devices now????
    That's largely due to consumer realities. USB3 only makes sense when transferring massive data loads. What devices actually need to do that? Mass storage, and that's it. Now compare storage devices to the number of every other USB device available. Your keyboards and mice still operate at USB 1.1. Printers, scanners, and office peripherals are still on 2.0 ( some possibly still on 1.1, ) and they can't even saturate that pipe. USB network adapters work just fine at 2.0 speeds. And the vast majority of flash drives today are still used to save a few office documents, pictures, and other small files. Incredibly few people are hauling around Windows install ISOs or large drive images on their thumb drives.
  • SteelCity1981
    I see that intel is still heavily investing in thunderbolt, which is prob why they aren't putting native usb 3.1 support on their chipsets for the next two generations reminds me of usb 3.0 all over again with intel.