USB 2.0, FireWire, Or eSATA: Which Interface Should You Use?
Benchmark Results: Access Time And Throughput
Access time is not particularly relevant for external storage products unless you intend to run applications on them. All of these products and interfaces deliver quick access times, though.
These numbers do not indicate peak throughput, but rather the average, which is more indicative of performance for everyday use. Clearly, eSATA rules, followed by FireWire 800. But even when using USB 2.0 there is a performance difference between these two drives.
Write throughput limits USB and FireWire 400 to roughly 30 MB/s, while eSATA especially rocks on.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Access Time And Throughput
Prev Page Test Setup And Throughput Diagrams Next Page Benchmark Results: Video, Photo, Mixed-Files Read TestStay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Researchers store multiple bits of data in diamond defects by encoding across different light frequencies, achieving a data density of 25GB per square inch
LogoFAIL exploit bypasses hardware and software security measures and is nearly impossible to detect or remove
Nvidia reportedly releasing a new and weaker RTX 3050 6GB to replace the already anemic 8GB variant