Page 1:Meet The Vector 150, OCZ's New Flagship SSD
Page 2:Test Setup and Benchmarks
Page 3:Results: 128 KB Sequential Performance
Page 4:Results: 4 KB Random Performance
Page 5:Results: The Vector 150's Performance Quirks
Page 6:Results: The Vector 150's Performance Quirks, Continued
Page 7:Results: Tom's Hardware Storage Bench
Page 8:Results: Tom's Hardware Storage Bench, Continued
Page 9:Results: PCMark 7 And PCMark Vantage
Page 10:Results: File Copy Performance
Page 11:Results: Power Consumption
Page 12:We Love Performance, But Also Want More Value
We Love Performance, But Also Want More Value
There was once a time when OCZ was synonymous with SSDs. The company sold much of the enthusiast community its first solid-state devices in products like the Vertex and Agility. But then the plankton bloomed, and now industry whales like Samsung, Micron, Intel, Toshiba, and SanDisk are feasting. The market is still growing prodigiously, but somehow keeps getting smaller for the companies without their own flash production capabilities. OCZ doesn't have the resources to open its own NAND fab, but it has acquired the intellectual property to tackle SSDs from the other end. It's a strategy we've seen work well in the enterprise, but hasn't necessarily been as successful on the desktop, where price sensitivity erodes its ability to make money.
As many companies are learning, the move to <20 nm-class NAND isn't kind to OCZ's Vector 150. If anything, though, that's primarily an artifact of the original Vector's smoking performance. The Vector 150 retains most of that as it embraces the latest manufacturing node that should be more readily available for longer. This is a win if you dig what OCZ is doing with its drives. But if you weren't a fan of the original, then the Vector 150 isn't going to change your mind. It's quite similar, with high-end performance and a price tag to match. Again, the 240 GB model sells for $250, the 120 GB version is being offered at $135, and the 480 GB SSD commands $490.
For anyone keeping score at home, the Vector 150 falls in just ahead of the Vertex 450 in our benchmarks. OCZ really disagrees on that point, but going by the tests we run, its Vector 150 is like a slightly faster version of the Vertex 450, itself a marginally slower version of the original Vector. All three are similar, but last generation's Vector is mostly above the new drive's performance. We don't necessarily see this as an issue, given the original's raw speed. However, we really wanted to see more aggressive pricing.
So, OCZ's current desktop-oriented line-up consists of three primary offerings: the Vector, the Vertex 450, and the new Vector 150. It just doesn't make sense for the company to do battle in the value-oriented space given its fiscal situation and competition from manufacturers with fabs. In a smaller pool, OCZ is looking to charge more for faster, higher-performance solutions. The trouble is that most enthusiasts are going to be perfectly happy with a 240 GB SSD that sells for $70 less than a 240 GB Vector 150. Small performance advantages over more mainstream offerings make it difficult to justify higher prices. The same caveat applies to other companies selling high-performance SSDs attached to bottlenecked 6 Gb/s interfaces. But OCZ has to go where the enthusiast money is, even if that means catering to a smaller audience.
- Meet The Vector 150, OCZ's New Flagship SSD
- Test Setup and Benchmarks
- Results: 128 KB Sequential Performance
- Results: 4 KB Random Performance
- Results: The Vector 150's Performance Quirks
- Results: The Vector 150's Performance Quirks, Continued
- Results: Tom's Hardware Storage Bench
- Results: Tom's Hardware Storage Bench, Continued
- Results: PCMark 7 And PCMark Vantage
- Results: File Copy Performance
- Results: Power Consumption
- We Love Performance, But Also Want More Value