Nvidia 800 VDC power rollout for 1 megawatt server racks to be supported by ABB — company says collaboration will create 'new power solutions for future gigawatt-scale data centers '

Microsoft data center
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Swedish-Swiss multinational industrial outfit ABB has announced a partnership with Nvidia that will see it support Nvidia's rollout of 800 VDC power architecture for 1 megawatt server racks. The company says the collaboration will power future gigawatt-scale data centers thanks to its high-efficiency infrastructure.

In case you haven't dipped your toes in the data center world, moving to 800V DC transmission is quite a big deal, as it allows for significant efficiency improvements, large cost savings in materials needed, and much higher upper limits on per-rack and per-data center power delivery. While the 800 VDC notion isn't new, having the world's largest chip designer fully embrace the standard throws substantial weight behind it.

Standard AC datacenter power delivery vs 800 VDC

Standard AC datacenter power delivery vs 800 VDC (Image credit: Nvidia)

Using a common PC as a basic example, electricity gets to your power supply in 110 V (or 220V) AC form, then gets converted to DC by said power supply to 12 V, 5 V, and 3.3 V. The conversion introduces a certain amount of loss, exacerbated many times over in a data center scenario. A good number of contemporary data center installations use medium voltage 340-480 V three-phase for the main line and across the building, and step down to DC at the PSUs and UPSes.

That's already more complicated than it needs to be. Even at the increased voltage of a data center, basic physics demands that in order to carry the hundreds of kilowatts that modern server racks can require, it's necessary to use extremely thick cables along with corresponding connectors and associated gear.

The equipment required for the multiple step-downs is likewise bulky and repeated, so to speak, in multiple steps along the way. All this is quite pricey and demands careful consideration when architecting data center buildings.

800 VDC data center power delivery

(Image credit: Nvidia)

Increasing the voltage to 800 V by itself already substantially knocks down the wire gauges necessary, and converting to DC immediately at the power room completely bypasses any further equipment up to the rack, with only current protection as a key element along the path. The rack equipment then takes care of stepping 800 V DC down to 12 V DC, bypassing the majority of components in a regular PSU. It's a win-win scenario for everyone involved.

While historically medium- and high-voltage lines have been AC to avoid transmission losses, material advancements have made long-range DC transmission more popular, like in the recently started 525 kV DC cable that will be running across the Mediterranean Sea floor. If, hypothetically, all data centers moved to the 800 VDC standards, the world could witness significant power savings as a result.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

  • jp7189
    800vdc is better in every way except for safety. Here's hoping that everyone working at these sites is properly trained.
    Reply
  • Misgar
    "The rack equipment then takes care of stepping 800 V DC down to 12 V DC, bypassing the majority of components in a regular PSU."
    What's the difference between stepping down the 340V DC on the bulk capacitor in my ATX PSU to 12V? Admittedly, 340V is less than half 800V and so currents will be higher per kW and wire gauges thicker. 800V DC is a common supply voltage in some EVs driven on the road, but still considered "safe".

    You still have to convert single or 3-phase AC into 800V, in the same way you convert 120/240V AC to high voltage DC in an ATX PSU. Perhaps there are economies of scale and at 1 Mega Watt I expect they're significant.

    jp7189 said:
    Here's hoping that everyone working at these sites is properly trained.
    I've worked in large data centres and all hazardous equipment above SELV is protected against most people, apart from suicidal idiots. If you have a death wish or a large axe, anything is possible. I wouldn't expect anyone apart from trained electricians with VDE tools to work on live circuits. Normal practice is to isolate first.

    I've seen training videos as part of my job about what happens if you drill through high voltage underground cables with a jack hammer. The pictures were quite gruesome.
    Reply
  • edzieba
    Misgar said:
    "The rack equipment then takes care of stepping 800 V DC down to 12 V DC, bypassing the majority of components in a regular PSU."
    What's the difference between stepping down the 340V DC on the bulk capacitor in my ATX PSU to 12V?
    In reality, rack stepdown to 12vDC is just for legacy support components, and generally low power. The high power draw rack-dedicated components (e.g. GPUs, CPUs, other accelerators) will received 54vDC, then step that down ('VRMs') to the ~1V the components actually draw from.

    The 54vDC to 1vDC is the old bit that is already in deployment. The new part is switching from internal AC distribution to internal 800vDC distribution, without the bus bar requirements of a 54vDC distribution system.

    ---

    Unfortunately, this won't have any effect on the well-known grid-scale issues with 'AI training' hyperscalers load patterns (millisecond-scale step changes in power draw in the tens of megawatt range), but not all datacentres that would adopt 800vDC would be for 'AI' training.
    Reply
  • Scott_Tx
    This new trend of using power use is a terrible way to compare performance.
    Reply