Both of these systems lean on Antec's EA-380D power supply, and we test them with power-saving features enabled. We did have to disable Cool’n’Quiet to overclock last quarter's PC, though.
Taxing both CPU cores and the graphics card using a combination of FurMark and Prime95 gives us a good look at the maximum potential power draw of both boxes.
FurMark tortures graphics card components making VRM temperatures skyrocket, and a growing number of cards cope with this stress by throttling back. As a result, we're shifting away from FurMark in favor of 3DMark 11’s first game test for measuring GPU power consumption in the SBM series.
Undervolting the March PC allowed for a 600 MHz frequency increase with only a 7 W jump in power use under full Prime95 load. Factor in the disappointing graphics overclock, and full system load (between Prime95 and 3DMark 11) was up just 11 W for our March PC. The result was the most efficient AMD-based system our series had ever seen.
But you haven't seen anything yet. While our current Sandy Bridge-based platform split the performance tests, its super-low power consumption will earn it major points in the efficiency chart!
Though we're using the same mid-tower ATX case and graphics card, the current PC 's ambient temperatures don't peak as high as last-quarter's build.
- Entry-Level Sandy Bridge
- CPU And Cooler
- Motherboard And Memory
- Graphics Card And Hard Drive
- Case, Power Supply, And Optical Drive
- Assembly And Overclocking
- Test System Configuration And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: Crysis And Just Cause 2
- Benchmark Results: F1 2010 And Metro 2033
- Benchmark Results: Audio And Video
- Benchmark Results: Productivity
- Benchmark Results: Synthetics
- Power Consumption And Temperatures
- Performance Summary, Efficiency, And Conclusion