1:01 PM - 04/27/1998 by
Thomas Pabst
- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share
When I am talking of 3D performance right now I mean 3D gaming performance. Most of you certainly know why I don't believe in 3D Winbench anymore, so that I am using four different current 3D games for my 3D performance evaluation instead. Acclaim's Forsaken, Rage's Incoming, Acclaim's Turok and Id's Quake II were run with each card at two different resolutions with two different CPUs to get the idea of what the 3D performance of each chip is like. Unfortunately there wasn't an OpenGL driver for the G200 ready for testing yet, so that we'll have to wait on the G200's Quake II evaluation until Matrox sends one over to me. Please remember that the G200 is still beta, so the results can and most likely will still improve.
Forsakenmark Results
Sponsored links
Related news
- Brands of ATI's new graphic chips leaked, Crossfire boards to cost more than $200
- Nvidia's market share for standalone graphic chips tumbles
- Conservative outlook by motherboard makers may have resulted in shortage of Nvidia G71 graphic chips
- Neurons self-organise to make brain chips
- Nvidia's nForce4 for Intel to arrive on April 6
Best offers
|
Radeon HD 4670 Video Card (1GB,... | $69.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $134.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Video Card (1GB,... | $199.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
GeForce GTS 250 Video Card (1GB,... | $199.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Radeon HD 5870 Video Card (1GB,... | $409.99 Newegg.com More info |
Popular Searches
Partners
Ads
I love reading these old articles especially by Mr Toms Hardware himself Thomas Pabst.
Look at the comments made in the conclusion, both Nvidia and ATI are getting owned by 3DFX and even more owned by 3DFX's SLI technology. How times have changed, no more 3DFX, ATI actually produce decent video cards and games running at 1680x1050 rather then a 800x600.