Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Power, Temperature, And Noise Benchmarks

Nettop Round-Up: Four Tiny PCs, Benchmarked And Reviewed
By

With a well-defined idea how each of these nettops performs, it's also important to consider power use and noise. Especially when it comes to enclosures without much airflow, cooling is a particular challenge that we need to evaluate.

We've finally found something that the ASRock CoreHT 252B struggles with in comparison to the other three competitors. The results are expected given a desktop-class processor. However, all of the machine's components still use less than 60 W with a full GPU and CPU load applied, so that power number hardly seems extreme.

The rest of these systems just sip power. It’s interesting that Arctic’s Atom D525/Mobility Radeon HD 5450 combo is more power hungry than the E-350- and Core i3-430UM-based machines.  

The temperatures are so close that the differences are barely worth mentioning. Arctic's MC001-BD does exceptionally well when you consider that it’s passively cooled.

Although Arctic is the shoo-in given its passive cooling system, the other models hardly generate enough noise to notice. We wouldn’t mind having any of these systems in close proximity on our desks.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 32 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 10 Hide
    chumly , October 10, 2011 4:59 AM
    These all seem expensive to me, considering you could probably build a better mini itx slim form factor system from scratch for about half the price.
  • 10 Hide
    Pyree , October 10, 2011 4:57 AM
    IDK, $800 for the ASRock CoreHT 252B. A laptop cost less, has better performance for that price range, better mobility and space saving plus you have everything (screen, speaker etc). I rather get a laptop for a small office.
Other Comments
  • -2 Hide
    jdwii , October 10, 2011 4:53 AM
    MISTAKE

    Quote:
    But at $504 with no operating system (and $399 for a version without an operating system, hard drive, or memory),
  • 10 Hide
    Pyree , October 10, 2011 4:57 AM
    IDK, $800 for the ASRock CoreHT 252B. A laptop cost less, has better performance for that price range, better mobility and space saving plus you have everything (screen, speaker etc). I rather get a laptop for a small office.
  • 10 Hide
    chumly , October 10, 2011 4:59 AM
    These all seem expensive to me, considering you could probably build a better mini itx slim form factor system from scratch for about half the price.
  • 1 Hide
    AMD X6850 , October 10, 2011 5:11 AM
    Quote:
    As mentioned, no remove comes bundled with the Zbox.


    Remote?
  • 1 Hide
    cleeve , October 10, 2011 5:19 AM
    AMD X6850Remote?


    Thx, fixed!
  • 1 Hide
    molo9000 , October 10, 2011 5:59 AM
    Nettops? These things are far too expensive to be nettops.
    They are small form factor PCs or home theatre PCs, but they are not nettops.

    btw: Mac mini should be in this lineup.
  • 0 Hide
    amk-aka-Phantom , October 10, 2011 6:45 AM
    Very nice article. I was about to request something like it :) 

    Mac Mini should be in this lineup? Actually, a good idea. I'd love to see how it compares to similar Wintel boxes.

    I'm through with these small boxes because they're a pain in the a$$ to service and the hardware isn't good for the price ($800?! gimme a break!), but I see value in them for people who are ready to pay more for the small size.

    If I would build a small form-factor box myself, I'd use something like this new Lian Li case which was in Tom's news recently - it can fit proper PCI/PCI-E cards.

    Again, lovely article. Keep it up.

    P.S. The ASRock box is great.
  • 1 Hide
    compton , October 10, 2011 7:14 AM
    I second the sentiment that these aren't really nettops. Luckily, the next iteration of Llano should rectify that, creating the golden triangle of CPU , GPU, and low cost. At least that's what I expect anyway. These reviewed units are more HTPC solutions than low cost nettop. Intel has a new half height miniITX initiative with a rare and relatively expensive 1155 mini ITX to match. However, once Intel's iGPU gets a serving of HTPC friendly features, you could build your own full featured, passively cooled system to take these units on performance and price as well. The move to 22nm should make low powered passively cooled CPUs easy to get right. As it stands, each of the solutions tested are pretty good, but I'm not sure that any of them are worth the asking price. In particular, I've always avoided Atom like the plague, and I don't think they're appropriate in small form factor systems that cost more than about $200.
  • 4 Hide
    ruban71 , October 10, 2011 8:16 AM
    Can we now have a comparison against a couple of ITX builds? Choose an nice looking case and show us what can be put together for similar money.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , October 10, 2011 10:10 AM
    I've owned an E350 - struggles with HD playback in a linux system, there doesn't appear to be any support for the amd hardware decoding. So if you were thinking of making a linux htpc out of it, go for something more powerful... It will perform better though as in the article above if using Windows (Using I think - Media Player classic which allows hardware h.264 decode.)
  • 0 Hide
    amk-aka-Phantom , October 10, 2011 10:33 AM
    Quote:
    I've owned an E350 - struggles with HD playback in a linux system, there doesn't appear to be any support for the amd hardware decoding. So if you were thinking of making a linux htpc out of it, go for something more powerful... It will perform better though as in the article above if using Windows (Using I think - Media Player classic which allows hardware h.264 decode.)


    I agree; I had to deal with E-350 (great mini-ITX Gigabyte board, btw, has everything) two weeks ago. It's a fail in Ubuntu, I barely got Compiz to work there without issues :lol:  and my 900 MHz Celeron M can usually max it out...
  • 0 Hide
    halls , October 10, 2011 1:58 PM
    Thanks for including the Starcraft II benchmark! Please test more systems with this game!
  • 1 Hide
    max40watt , October 10, 2011 2:28 PM
    My E-350 w/ Win7 running inside an old Nintendo makes for a fine HTPC.



  • 0 Hide
    zaho0006 , October 10, 2011 3:43 PM
    Also would say my E-350 system is fine, was under $300 to build with Windows and no Bluray drive. Plays back anything but 1080P mkv files from WMC (which works fine in other software) and handles all of my HD recording/playback from WMC as well.
  • 2 Hide
    leandrodafontoura , October 10, 2011 4:04 PM
    Why no MacMini in the comparison?
  • 0 Hide
    chumly , October 10, 2011 4:20 PM
    ruban71Can we now have a comparison against a couple of ITX builds? Choose an nice looking case and show us what can be put together for similar money.


    I'd also like to see an ITX system marathon.
  • 2 Hide
    fulle , October 10, 2011 4:39 PM
    The prices are just too high. It shouldn't be possible for me to just buy a superior performing laptop instead, and actually SAVE money.

    In that vain, it's difficult for me to even build a llano based system myself, at a low enough cost to justify doing so.
  • 0 Hide
    cobra5000 , October 10, 2011 5:35 PM
    OVERPRICED!
  • 0 Hide
    K2N hater , October 10, 2011 8:57 PM
    I wanna see how good some undervolted Llano performs against anything else when set on an ITX heatsink-like case. I have a feeling running Crysis on a silent rig with system power comsuption below 80W is the deal of the decade.
  • -1 Hide
    deadlockedworld , October 10, 2011 10:25 PM
    molo9000btw: Mac mini should be in this lineup.


    I completely agree -- this was a large omission as the Mac mini is actually the class leader in this segment. Surprisingly, it is even price competitive with the PC options listed above! (weird for Apple)

    This comparison would be more valuable than typical PC/Mac because OS is largely irrelevant for a websurfing/netflix nettop. The lighter footprint of Mac OS would probably yield better performance.
Display more comments