Halo Infinite Benchmarked: Master Chief Eats Tons of VRAM

Halo Infinite Benchmarked
(Image credit: Xbox Game Studios)

Halo Infinite puts yet another major launch into the Xbox Series X/S library, and because it’s a first party title, Microsoft has also launched the game on PC. Naturally, we want to see how well Halo Infinite runs on the best graphics cards. We got a game code via AMD for testing purposes, as this is an AMD-promoted game. Sadly, that code was for the Microsoft Store — still the most user unfriendly experience of all the major distribution platforms. That does enable Play Anywhere support for Xbox and PC, but personally I'd rather have the game on Steam. However, that's all beside the point.

We wrote recently about what makes for a good game benchmark, and why built-in benchmarks are so helpful for those who want to check performance. Halo Infinite sadly doesn't include a benchmark mode, which means manual testing while capturing frametimes using OCAT. Our test sequence uses one of the first outdoor areas of the game, cleared of enemies so that we can simply run the same route each time without the threat of dying. Note that performance can be quite a bit higher in other areas of the game, but it can also be lower in multiplayer mode, especially in the midst of a large firefight.

One thing that quickly became clear during our testing is that Halo Infinite using the ultra graphics preset can eat a lot of video memory. While you might be able to get by with 6GB at 1080p ultra, you'll get a better experience by dropping a few settings down a notch — to the point where the game indicates it's not using substantially more than 6GB. We'll run through the best settings to tweak further down the page, but let's start with the head-to-head AMD and Nvidia GPU benchmarks.

Halo Infinite Test Hardware 

Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • VforV
    Our test sequence uses one of the first outdoor areas of the game, cleared of enemies so that we can simply run the same route each time without the threat of dying. Note that performance can be quite a bit higher in other areas of the game
    Yes, performance actually varies so much that I would say you test is really not indicative of how horrible the game runs in the most demanding parts...

    Your test, with the older i9 9900k and a low demanding area cleared of enemies gets this:

    And here is Hardware Unboxed on a Ryzen 5950x, doing runs on one of the most demanding parts of the game, full of enemies... can you see how big the difference is?

    What I don't understand is why the results are inversed? nvidia is stomping AMD in HUB's test while in your case is AMD is above nvidia...
    Reply
  • Lord_Moonub
    Would be greatly appreciated if the 3070 featured in these benchmarks. Its notable by omission. Are you guys missing a test card?
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    i've been playing the multiplayer at Ultrawide 3440x1440 and its been great however my setup is highend 5800x+6800XT. And I have SAM on which is suppose to give a 8% boost in performance from what i've seen posted elsewhere.
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    and... hardware unboxed shows better FPS for Nvidia and I trust hardware unboxed way more

    At least hardware unboxed explained where they run the benchmark and showed on video the run.

    This is not the first time I see crazy FPS numbers on tomshardware in favor of 6800/6900 but in reality / other reviews they fall behind the 3080/3090.

    Not to mention crap AMD drivers which are crazy inconsistent with fps for various games.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    wifiburger said:
    and... hardware unboxed shows better FPS for Nvidia and I trust hardware unboxed way more

    At least hardware unboxed explained where they run the benchmark and showed on video the run.

    This is not the first time I see crazy FPS numbers on tomshardware in favor of 6800/6900 but in reality / other reviews they fall behind the 3080/3090.

    Not to mention crap AMD drivers which are crazy inconsistent with fps for various games.

    You may want to slow down on the fanboying bruh.

    A comment from the steve on the youtube video.


    My performance with SAM on matches what toms is showing.

    gFLrRdU5f-MView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFLrRdU5f-M
    Reply
  • ssj3rd
    8GB is „tons of VRam“ at the end of 2021?
    Really?
    Reply
  • wifiburger
    did they use the Windows store version of the game ?

    Because the nvidia driver optimization for the game is not active with the ms store version !

    good move by AMD lol

    "as this is an AMD-promoted game. Sadly, that code was for the Microsoft Store "
    Reply
  • VforV
    Makaveli said:
    You may want to slow down on the fanboying bruh.

    A comment from the steve on the youtube video.


    My performance with SAM on matches what toms is showing.

    gFLrRdU5f-MView: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFLrRdU5f-M
    Well that answers my question, at least partially.
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    VforV said:
    Well that answers my question, at least partially.

    kitguru also shows similar
    https://www.kitguru.net/gaming/dominic-moass/halo-infinite-pc-performance-benchmark-25-gpus-tested/
    Reply
  • Blacksad999
    VforV said:
    Yes, performance actually varies so much that I would say you test is really not indicative of how horrible the game runs in the most demanding parts...

    Your test, with the older i9 9900k and a low demanding area cleared of enemies gets this:

    And here is Hardware Unboxed on a Ryzen 5950x, doing runs on one of the most demanding parts of the game, full of enemies... can you see how big the difference is?

    What I don't understand is why the results are inversed? nvidia is stomping AMD in HUB's test while in your case is AMD is above nvidia...

    Yeah, I was curious about this myself. All other benchmarks I've seen from reputable places largely have the same results as HWU, with Nvidia ahead by a fair margin.
    Reply