Inside Intel's CPU Packaging Factory: From Wafer to Chip

7

Final Thoughts

Intel has a tremendous arsenal of cutting-edge chip packaging tech, and that will help it not only move to chiplet-based designs (called 'tiles' in Intel parlance) with Meteor Lake but also to sell its packaging services to other companies as part of its Intel Foundry Services initiative. In fact, Intel's first IFS customers were attracted to its packaging services. With the current shortage of packaging production capacity that has led to Nvidia's AI GPU shortages (which TSMC says won't be resolved for a year and a half), it's a safe bet that Intel will see a lot more interest in those services over the coming year.

On the packaging front, Intel's biggest near-term objective is to build the scale of its advanced packaging operations. Meteor Lake represents the first time Intel has used advanced packaging in its high-volume client processor lineup, and that can be a tricky endeavor. The consumer market demands massive volume shipments, and Intel plans to quadruple its advanced packaging capacity by 2025, part of which involves investing $7 billion in new facilities in Kulim in addition to its investments in Penang and Rio Ranco in the United States. It's even pledged to build an advanced packaging plant in Poland, too, though the timeline of that effort remains in flux.

However, Intel also has a challenge: Cost. Advanced packaging invariably costs more than the standard single-die packaging process used with the majority of today's chips, and in the consumer market, that could limit its applicability to higher-end models that tend to chase the edge of performance. We can expect those costs to eventually diminish over time, but they remain a factor with Intel's Meteor Lake line of chips, and perhaps with the follow-on Arrow and Lunar Lake processors that will employ similar 3D Foveros designs.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    "If successful, those advanced nodes will grant Intel the lead over TSMC for the first time in years, " - so, the reasoning being here, that TSMC will be standing by scratching their arses during this same period. And thus Intel will overtake them!? Okay.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    https://fuse.wikichip.org/news/7375/tsmc-n3-and-challenges-ahead/
    Intel will match TSMCs std cell density with the Intel 4 process by the end of this year. After that, roadmap projections indicate Intel will pull ahead.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Nice one, @PaulAlcorn, must have been a dream tour!
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    "If successful, those advanced nodes will grant Intel the lead over TSMC for the first time in years, " - so, the reasoning being here, that TSMC will be standing by scratching their arses during this same period. And thus Intel will overtake them!? Okay.

    No, you just inserted your own thoughts. No one is saying TSMC is going to stand still. We're saying they aren't going to be able to keep up.
    Reply
  • vertuallinsanity
    Intel utilized TMSC as a stand-in *partner* during a period of machinery teething issues.

    The intention of that partnership, for certain products, was always temporary in nature or Intel would have gone fab-less similar to AMD. Intel utilized TSMC to prevent bring-to-market delay while simultaneously reworking their fab processes and equipment to a viable state.

    The article seems to imply TSMC makes their own processors or gpus and they're in direct competiton with Intel. They don't and they arent.

    TSMC and/or Intel may trade process enhancement "blows" but Intel makes Intel CPUs for Intel and TSMC makes 'em for "anybody".

    The article implication could apply to Apple, NVidia, AMD or others competing with Intel on similar node products.

    Intel will continue to work with TSMC on GPUs and other product lines deemed fiscally feasible. Intel and TSMC are still partners.

    There is no way anyone from Tom's hardware was allowed a tour of Intel's new ish.

    Fact..
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    jkflipflop98 said:
    No, you just inserted your own thoughts. No one is saying TSMC is going to stand still. We're saying they aren't going to be able to keep up.
    No, you just inserted your own thoughts, in relation to my post!

    If you didn't notice, this article is one sided! I did certainly enjoy the tour and article in relation to Intel's tech, but there is zero context as to why TSMC 'might' fall behind.

    You are right, no one is saying TSMC is gonna fall behind, but without context how is a reader supposed to know that? By checking the forums posts for an addendum article that gives the reasons why TSMC might fall behind? A bit of balance to illustrate these comments would help.
    Reply
  • td47
    It would be interesting to know how Intel prevents IP and manufacturing methods/secrets from being exfiltrated from the Chengdu facility in China - given that country's penchant f or stealing and copying the Western Tech to try to catch up!
    Reply