Varjo VR-3 and XR-3 VR Headsets Raise the Resolution Bar With Bionic Displays

Varjo XR-3
(Image credit: Varjo)

Varjo today announced its next generation of VR and XR headsets. The VR-3 and XR-3 pack all the significant features businesses need from a professional-class headset, including wide field of view (FOV), eye tracking, hand tracking and top-of-the-line positional tracking. But even more impressive are the Bionic Displays promising the highest pixel density we’ve ever seen in HMDs.

Varjo's headsets have been on the market for a while, but it wouldn't be a surprise if you've never heard them. Varjo's headsets are costly and not sold to individuals. Varjo's XR-3 is available now to businesses for $5,495, which is down from over $10,000 for the XR-2. The new VR-3 headset is cheaper at $3,195, again with the price slashed in half from the outgoing model. That puts these headsets right in line with the StarVR One, another enterprise-class VR headset, and well below the cost of an XTAL from VRgineers.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Kevin Carbotte is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware who primarily covers VR and AR hardware. He has been writing for us for more than four years.

  • Vince R
    I don't understand the highest resolution comment. Don't the Pimax 8K headsets have dual 3840x2160 displays?

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/pimax-vision-8k-x-vr-headset
    Reply
  • jkflipflop98
    It's expensive for home use, but for a business it's dirt cheap. Build a simulation rig with $100,000 worth of customized LED panels, or spend $6k and get one of these. It's a no-brainer.
    Reply
  • kcarbotte
    Vince R said:
    I don't understand the highest resolution comment. Don't the Pimax 8K headsets have dual 3840x2160 displays?

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/pimax-vision-8k-x-vr-headset

    What I meant to say was the highest pixel density.
    The pimax screens are much larger, therefore the pixels are spread out more.

    I am not 100% sure that the numbers in this thread are accurate, but if they are, the PPD of the peripheral screen in the new Varjo headsets is roughly 50% denser than that of the Pimax 8K headsets, while the central screen is more than three times as dense.

    virtualreality/comments/bt380eView: https://www.reddit.com/r/virtualreality/comments/bt380e/ppd_and_ppi_values_for_newer_headsets/

    Pimax 8K+/8KX -- 20.1PPD
    Varjo VR-3 -- 30 PPD
    Reply
  • Vince R
    Thanks for the clarification.
    Reply
  • computerguy72
    So the VArjo vr-3 is 70ppd in the inner 27 degrees and about 12ppd outside of that. I get 35.6ppd for the Pimax 8KX. Their 8kx is different than their other headsets as the signal is not scaled and they say the panel utilization is over 95%.
    Reply
  • fireaza
    That’s a pretty clever idea for the screen. The human eye only see details in the center area of vision, which you can take advantage of by rendering the images with reduced resolution at the edges to improve performance. But actually building the screen so there’s more pixels in the center and less at the edges also accomplishes the same thing and probably has less compatibility issues.
    Reply