Intel Shows Ray Traced Wolfenstein on a Laptop

Anyone being interested in these technologies is always good.

Quote:

4 MIC servers doing the job, is just like saying: look what we could do in 10 years...

Exactly. What's the point of this demo anyway? Realtime raytracing has been demonstrated many times. Everyone knows it's possible, but:

- global illumination in realtime is something completely different
- most images in this demo could have been rendered at a comparable quality with current rasterization technology

So this demo brings nothing new to the table. Just a marketing stunt from Intel.

is it me, or does the game still look like crap?

4 mainframes rendering and sending data to a client in real time? I can see this being more useful to cloud gaming services then the individual consumer. By the time this tech is available to the masses in a cost effective package, something cheaper and more efficient will be available.

I bet if Intel tried this with Crysis, they wouldn't be posting a video of it, sure it's impressive with old games, Mhmm intel? I Dare you to try it with Crysis. well to be honest i think it would perform similarly if they threw enough hardware at it..

ati and nvidia better become good friends with intel

joytech22I bet if Intel tried this with Crysis, they wouldn't be posting a video of it, sure it's impressive with old games, Mhmm intel? I Dare you to try it with Crysis. well to be honest i think it would perform similarly if they threw enough hardware at it..

Umm....Crysis already uses ray tracing for shadows and stuff.

So basically Intel "cheated".

Imagine 4 milion ppl playing a game at the same time with this "off PC rendering farm" ... seriously ...this is just a gimmick to render few things on slow pc but will not be able to replace a powerfull computer. This is not efficient at all, because besides needing a colossal server to render the frames, you`ll need a colossal bandwidth.

I was gonna say...the HL2 engine has been doing this...at higher resolutions...for a few years now....on one processor (with maybe 2 cores at the least) and at higher framerates.

decepticonI was gonna say...the HL2 engine has been doing this...at higher resolutions...for a few years now....on one processor (with maybe 2 cores at the least) and at higher framerates.

Let me rehprase....The HL2 engine has been doing this not using ray tracing....

So basically 4 servers to have game still look like on a laptop. Way to go intel.

Seriously though, it's cool they can do this, and that they're researching into this area but if this was meant to impress it didn't succeed in doing so with me.

Quick focusing on what the edges / artwork looks like and focus on what the technology is doing. That is pretty awesome actually.

Still though, I am betting this type of work works better on CUDA / ATI Stream rather then on a CPU.

eg: They could probably do the same thing with a couple of Tesla cards in one box, rather then 4 servers.

The first paragraph looks and sounds as if it were written by a middle school journalism student. How can you possibly expect anyone to take you seriously when you write that poorly? I'm embarrassed for you. My 8 year old nephew could have read that and told me something was wrong.

Um, you'd think Microsoft would be ray tracing something a little more impressive. -.-

korsenUm, you'd think Microsoft would be ray tracing something a little more impressive. -.-

Maybe they are no one knows since this article is about Intel not Microsoft :P

Seriously Editors WTF?
You allow or even put in cheap page view gimmicks like this? And even have the stones to put I in red on the front page.

Sorry I'n not $20 hooker you will lose me as a reader if you keep pulling cheap stunts like this.