Benchmark maker comments on the scarcity of Qualcomm Copilot+ PC tests in the wild — only 56 Windows-on-Arm devices benchmarked in the last 30 days

Red reference laptops with Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite.
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

PassMark Software seems unimpressed by the number of Copilot+ PC tests that it has seen in the wild since the new platform launched. In a Twitter/X post, the long-established benchmarking company shared that over the last 30 days, it has seen 22,000 Windows x86 machines put through its CPU test suite, yet only 56 Windows-on-Arm machines have been benchmarked. Thus, only 0.3% of recently tested machines were powered by Snapdragon X CPUs.

According to the data gathered by PassMark, “there’s a long road ahead” for Copilot+ PCs and Qualcomm due to the deficient representation of these Arm architecture PCs being tested by end users. The Australian software firm highlighted the disparity between the observed 0.3% user base and the Qualcomm CEO’s boldly stated target of capturing 50% of the Windows PC market within five years.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Notton
    That's about expected. Paying $1000~1200 to become a beta tester is a steep price to pay. If it was some $300 to $400 cheaper, then I would be enticed.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Admin said:
    However, Qualcomm’s time in the excellent battery life spotlight may soon fade. Today, the new HP OmniBook Ultra 14 launched with AMD Ryzen AI 300 processor options and a touted battery life range between 13 and 21 hours. Intel Lunar Lake portables are also expected later this quarter, and these also have numerous optimizations for increased efficiency with better battery life.

    You all didn't just expect AMD and Intel to sit around, shrug their shoulders, and not make improvements, did you?
    Reply
  • bit_user
    What a silly article! They should restrict the comparison between ARM vs. x86 submissions just to laptop CPUs. Probably a lot more people are benchmarking desktops, due to the way benchmarks facilitate tweaking & tuning, as the article mentioned.

    Second, I'd have a lot more interest in running PassMark on Snapdragon, if I knew it could test ARM-native performance. Unless/until they have that, they shouldn't act so surprised.
    Reply
  • jiij
    ezst036 said:
    You all didn't just expect AMD and Intel to sit around, shrug their shoulders, and not make improvements, did you?
    I need to see their excellent battery life while on idle/windows sleep. That's something that most x86 laptops struggle
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Notton said:
    That's about expected. Paying $1000~1200 to become a beta tester is a steep price to pay. If it was some $300 to $400 cheaper, then I would be enticed.

    I suspect many consumers are over all the AI hype as well, or not interested in it. I don't know anyone personally, that is in favor of AI. I even disabled CoPilot on my laptop.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    logainofhades said:
    I suspect many consumers are over all the AI hype as well, or not interested in it. I don't know anyone personally, that is in favor of AI. I even disabled CoPilot on my laptop.
    I know/work with one.
    But he is a serious dumbass, that just knows he knows better than the rest of us.
    Reply