Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition review: Incremental gains over the previous generation

Wholly dependent on multi-frame generation to appear faster.

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Founders Edition card photos and unboxing
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Nvidia RTX 5080 Rasterization Gaming Performance

We're breaking down gaming performance into two categories: Traditional rasterization games, and ray tracing games. Each game has four test settings, but we're mostly interested in the 4K ultra results on the 5080. 1440p ultra is also important and represents a stand-in for DLSS Quality mode at 4K, while 1080p ultra/medium is mostly just for reference (and to check for any odd behavior). We also have the overall performance geomean, the rasterization geomean, and the ray tracing geomean.

We'll start with the rasterization suite of 16 games, as that's arguably still the most useful measurement of gaming performance. Extreme GPUs like the 5080 and 5090 can be used with full RT enabled, even at 4K, but we're still working on additional tests for that subset of performance (on multiple GPUs for comparison purposes).

We'll have limited to no commentary on most of the individual game charts, as the numbers mostly speak for themselves. We'll have more to say on the Geomean charts as they provide the big picture.

Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • cknobman
    Pretty darn dissapointing.
    Sit back and let the impatient suckers get fleeced.
    I'll happily wait for March and see if AMD can offer something worth buying at $500.
    Reply
  • LolaGT
    Wow, I am a little gob smacked that nvidia is selling that with a straight face.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    It's so cheap though, $1000 less than the 5090.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Not good. Can't imagine even Nvidia engineers are proud of this product.
    Reply
  • King_V
    I initially looked at the TDP numbers, and thought: a new architecture, slightly more than 10% extra power draw for slightly less than 10% extra performance, on average, for gaming.

    But, that it actually doesn't exceed the power consumption during use of the 4080 Super is nice to see.

    Still, yeah, if you're in the market for a GPU with this performance, and if the price is the same, the 5080 is the way to go.

    But, I feel like the odds are that, at least for a few months, the 5080 will cost more, and the 4080 Super prices MIGHT come down a little with the release of the 5000 series. If so, that situation could make the 5080 a hard sell.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Gururu said:
    It's so cheap though, $1000 less than the 5090.
    5090 is more than 50% faster than 5080 which is ridiculous. There's something to be said for trying to upsell, but that's way too big a gap in performance and cost between the 5080 and 5090. Also sounds like there are issues with volume production as well. Getting people to move up doesn't work if you don't have product to sell them. If you're in the market for a 5080, wait for the refresh. Will likely have more VRAM and will hopefully gain some meaningful ground in performance.
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    How is "second fastest GPU" a positive? Its not even true, the 4090 is the second fastest GPU. This is the worst 80 series release by Nvidia for a while now. Im pretty sure the last 4-5 generations of 80 series cards have outperformed the previous generation flagship (except the 2080 vs 1080ti which was also a quite disappointing generation).
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Thank you @JarredWaltonGPU for the detailed review and pointing out the flaws of this underwhelming product. The 80 class is officially dead? I wish you had the time to include the 3090 as well so we could see how 4080 performed against it and in turn highlight the fact that the 5080 doesn’t even come close to the 4090.

    I was in the market for a 5080 but my excitement died down gradually with the leaks about its specs over the past few months and with the reviews out I’m definitely not planning to throw €1200+ at it.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Elusive Ruse said:
    I wish you had the time to include the 3090 as well so we could see how 4080 performed against it and in turn highlight the fact that the 5080 doesn’t even come close to the 4090.
    5080 is 50% faster than the 3090 at 4k. So a decent upgrade for 3090 users for less money than they spent on their 3090 though there is a memory downgrade. Still would recommend waiting for the refresh.
    Reply
  • I'm getting the impression that the reason behind 5080 being so disappointing, is Nvidia trying to funnel consumers into buying the extremely inflated 5090.
    Reply