MSI brings 256GB RAM support on Intel and AMD motherboards

MEG Z790 Godlike Max
MEG Z790 Godlike Max (Image credit: MSI)
21

While the best RAM already works on MSI's Intel and AMD motherboards, the vendor has enabled support of 64GB DDR5 memory modules through a new firmware update. It allows users to use up to 256GB of memory, unprecedented on a consumer platform.

DDR5 introduced non-standard capacities for memory modules, such as 24GB and 48GB. These new densities have increased the maximum memory kit capacity to 96GB and 192GB, respectively. However, bigger things are coming. Memory manufacturers are preparing their mainstream 64GB memory modules for prime time. Kingston is one of the vendors that have shown off the brand's upcoming 256GB memory kits, comprised of four 64GB memory modules.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • thisisaname
    When you four slots with 256GB is it likely to result in have to run it slower than if you filled 2 slots with 128GB?

    256GB more than I am ever going to need but it does not stop me thinking maybe for my next build :unsure: :ROFLMAO:
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    thisisaname said:
    When you four slots with 256GB is it likely to result in have to run it slower than if you filled 2 slots with 128GB?
    yes the more sticks you have the more stress on controller & fix is running them slower speeds. (how much slower ofc varies)
    Reply
  • usertests
    thisisaname said:
    When you four slots with 256GB is it likely to result in have to run it slower than if you filled 2 slots with 128GB?

    256GB more than I am ever going to need but it does not stop me thinking maybe for my next build :unsure: :ROFLMAO:
    I might never use more than 2 DIMMs again. We can have 96 GB in that situation now, 128 GB soon. Good enough for me.

    Looking at one of Samsung's roadmaps, it looks like 64 GB UDIMMs are the end of the line for consumer DDR5, but DDR6 will bring at least 96 GB modules using 48 Gb dies, and I assume 128 GB. It remains to be seen if traditional DIMMs will be in use after that generation.

    If consumers get quad-channel APUs, then I'll take another look at using 4 DIMMs.
    Reply
  • TechLurker
    Now that consumer boards can push close to basic prosumer levels of RAM, I'd like for Intel and AMD to get off their butts and increase PCIe slot counts in the consumer lineup again too. Like during the dual-triple-quad SLI/X-Fire days. Mainly to be able to run at least a second x16 slot for either a 2nd GPU (used for AI or whatever), a capture card (capturing 4k/8k/More-k), a networking card, or an x16 NVMe drive.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    usertests said:
    I might never use more than 2 DIMMs again. We can have 96 GB in that situation now, 128 GB soon. Good enough for me.
    Yeah if you want high speed DDR5 you're really limited to 1DPC or crossing your fingers that you got a great memory controller. The way things have gone I'd like to see a broader range of 1DPC motherboard choices.
    usertests said:
    If consumers get quad-channel APUs, then I'll take another look at using 4 DIMMs.
    Unfortunately I'd be surprised if Intel and/or AMD went this route for socketable CPUs. I think if it happens it will be laptop CPUs and likely with soldered DRAM (or potentially CAMM, but not SODIMMs).
    TechLurker said:
    Now that consumer boards can push close to basic prosumer levels of RAM, I'd like for Intel and AMD to get off their butts and increase PCIe slot counts in the consumer lineup again too. Like during the dual-triple-quad SLI/X-Fire days. Mainly to be able to run at least a second x16 slot for either a 2nd GPU (used for AI or whatever), a capture card (capturing 4k/8k/More-k), a networking card, or an x16 NVMe drive.
    Outside of HEDT consumer CPUs have always been quite limited with regards to PCIe. The thing that changed is Broadcom bought PLX Technology and jacked up the prices on PLX chips. While PCIe switches don't solve the problem of limited bandwidth they did allow for more slots.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    usertests said:
    I might never use more than 2 DIMMs again.
    never is a strong word ;)

    if Quad channel becomes norm theres benefit to running 4 sticks.
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    TechLurker said:
    Now that consumer boards can push close to basic prosumer levels of RAM, I'd like for Intel and AMD to get off their butts and increase PCIe slot counts in the consumer lineup again too. Like during the dual-triple-quad SLI/X-Fire days. Mainly to be able to run at least a second x16 slot for either a 2nd GPU (used for AI or whatever), a capture card (capturing 4k/8k/More-k), a networking card, or an x16 NVMe drive.
    What again? it is the same lanes numbers ... and the extra x16 slots are only mechanical .. in old times if you wanted true x16 more slots you are not on a consumer level anymore but very high end HEDT systems with more lanes. and this never stopped for AMD , you can choose Threadrippers for tons of lanes and tons of slots.
    Reply
  • usertests
    hotaru251 said:
    never is a strong word ;)

    if Quad channel becomes norm theres benefit to running 4 sticks.
    I said that in the post. Maybe Strix Halo or something will support regular DIMM slots to get to quad-channel and not just LPDDR5(X). Maybe we'll see stacked CAMMs getting to quad-channel. Maybe normal/prosumer CPUs (not Threadripper/Xeon) will support quad-channel. But it's a lot of maybes right now.
    Reply
  • Notton
    Yeah, I would love to see more than dual channel RAM for consumer again.
    Like that weird Intel triple channel i7-900.
    Reply
  • mac_angel
    "More RAM than Chrome can chew on."
    Yea, I can just see the Chrome programmers going, "hold my beer"
    Reply