Viewing Angles, Uniformity, Response And Lag, G-Sync
To learn how we measure screen uniformity, please click here.
Acer lists the XB271HK as an IPS-type panel but it’s plain from our photos that it’s of the AHVA variety. This technology prioritizes viewing angles by reducing the thickness of the grid polarizer. The result is only a slight output reduction when seen from 45 degrees to the sides or above. The color shift is a touch green but nowhere near as much as a typical IPS panel. Detail retention in the vertical plane is also exceptional when compared to any other LCD display variant.
Screen Uniformity: Luminance
Our sample measures well in the black field test. All the zones are within a hair of each other except the bottom right. You’ll recall that zone also skewed the ANSI test a bit. If not for that, this result would likely have been a top-finisher. Even so, we still have no visual problems to report. IPS glow or light bleed are not in evidence here.
Here’s the white field measurement.
In the white field test we can see a slight center hotspot, and the bottom third of the screen measures a little higher than the upper six zones. It’s just barely visible in the test pattern but doesn’t seem to affect any of the content we viewed during gameplay or productivity testing.
Screen Uniformity: Color
Color uniformity is among the best we’ve seen from the 80-plus panels we’ve tested since 2013. The only panel in this group that actually has a visual issue is the XG2700-4K. The rest are within our preferred tolerance levels. This metric varies from sample to sample, but we rarely see a display with serious issues in this test.
Pixel Response And Input Lag
Please click here to read up on our pixel response and input lag testing procedures.
Only the XB280HK seems to be able to break the 20ms barrier for 60Hz screens. The AOC, also a TN panel, is next fastest. While you might see a 6ms difference in motion blur, it’s unlikely anyone would see a one or two millisecond variation. Combined with G-Sync, we have no complaints about the motion processing of the XB271HK.
Here are the lag results.
Acer leads the pack in input lag with both its Ultra HD displays. The TN panel seems to have the edge, which isn’t surprising given its 8-bit color depth. That the XB271HK can manage a 61ms result with a native 10-bit rendering is impressive. When it comes to gaming at such high resolutions, input lag is only one of many concerns. An underpowered video card will introduce judder and other artifacts that also serve to harm the gaming experience.
Gaming With G-Sync
As long as one stays within the adaptive refresh range of a particular monitor, there is no visual difference between G-Sync and FreeSync in a gameplay situation. However when dealing with Ultra HD resolution and its 60Hz rate cap, the bottom of the range becomes important because the operational window is smaller. We’ve reviewed a couple of FreeSync screens that came with an uncomfortably high lower limit and made setting game detail levels difficult. With a G-sync screen though, you’ll never get tearing below the minimum refresh rate because frame doubling takes over. For example, if the bottom is 30Hz and the frame rate drops to 29, the screen starts refreshing at 58Hz and drawing each frame twice. So all you see is a gradual increase in judder until the game becomes unplayable due to excessive input lag.
Another thing we’re trying to decide is just how much Ultra HD resolution improves the gaming experience. With a QHD display, framerates can be pushed beyond 60Hz which makes the whole thing much smoother. When you consider that the biggest disadvantage of any LCD panel is its inherent motion blur, it makes sense that faster refresh is the way to smooth motion. Playing at a maximum of 60Hz is fine but not exceptional when it comes to fast on-screen movement. And after testing many gaming monitors, it looks to us like 75Hz is a pretty good threshold to shoot for. At that speed, motion blur is virtually non-existent, even without the use of overdrive or backlight strobing.
In the XB271HK’s case, we performed our usual torture tests playing Tomb Raider, Far Cry 4 and Battlefield 4. Perceptions were pretty much the same as we’d seen on previous Ultra HD panels with adaptive refresh. Tear-free rendering – check. Reduce motion blur with overdrive – check. Judder when framerates drop below 40 – check. Acer’s overdrive implementation is fairly conservative which means there’s no ghosting but not a significant blur reduction either. We settled on Normal as the best setting. And G-Sync’s frame doubling ensured that the experience didn’t change when things got slow.
The world is still not ready for 4k (but getting closer). 2 more years, 2 more years.
YES. This is an opinion gamers need to know before buying a 4K monitor and one that has been missing from your previous reviews. KUDOS for finally dishing out some common sense. These resolutions are too high.
3440x1440, 120hz, OLED HDR 34" monitors with low latency to be a thing in 2-3 years. but until we have the hardware to drive that resolution, it makes no sense to wait. i think a 35" 2560x1080 144hz VA panel is amazing right now (for gaming).
Perhaps 4K w/GSync, hitting 100Hz and we have a winner... But of course, then comes that killer price tag.
I then picked up a PG279Q which has less backlight bleed.
I found both monitors to have great performance, but found the backlight bleed on both to be distracting.
I really don't think either Asus or Acer is where they need to be when they charge $800 for a 1440p IPS monitor. These panels may perform well, but they are not great IPS panels from a backlight bleed standpoint. They should be priced around $500 because of the low-end IPS panels. You know what I mean if you've used a good IPS panel.
Hopefully, they'll stop ripping people off one day.