Trending

Six 2.5” High-Capacity Notebook Hard Drives

By ,

Advanced Format technology makes it possible to build 9.5 mm high 2.5” hard disks with 500 GB per platter. The result is a range of slim and speedy storage giants.

Power Consumption

Samsung and Hitachi keep their power consumption in check quite well, but the Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD10JPVT does even better across all of the simulated use cases to which we subjected it.

As expected, the Scorpio Blue WD10JPVT can’t be beat when it comes to performance per watt. Surprisingly, the power hog in this round-up, Western Digital’s Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT, winds up in second place. While it draws more power than its competitors, it overcomes that with consistently higher performance.

25 Comments Comment from the forums
  • arpitnathany 03 November 2011 12:00
    On the western digital hard disk page the Western Digital Scorpio Black WD7500BPKT is mentioned as 750 TB please correct it.

    Nice article as a whole
    Reply
  • arpitnathany 03 November 2011 12:02
    On a lighter note I would love to have a 750 TB drive at that price
    someday.....
    Reply
  • acyuta 03 November 2011 12:09
    Good to have all the latest data in one place. Wish Dell had put in the 750GB Scorpio Black instead of 750GB Momentus in my XPS15.

    One minor point: good to know that i7-920 is now part of Sandybridge. Can you check???
    Reply
  • JeTJL 03 November 2011 12:12
    Wonder how well these things survive the drop test. If they can survive a fall that a SSD can sustain then I'll be up for it. Other than that wish higher capacity SSDs become cheaper.
    Reply
  • Zero_ 03 November 2011 12:53
    Talk about a bad time for a hard drive comparison...
    Reply
  • howardp6 03 November 2011 17:01
    GoFlex is a Seagate disk product line not Western Digital
    Reply
  • AppleBlowsDonkeyBalls 03 November 2011 22:31
    Western Digital hard drives sound good in theory for laptops, but they're not. I would never use one unless they fix a fatal flaw.

    What flaw? The fact that the hard drive automatically goes to sleep (parks its head) after eight seconds of inactivity, and since this is hardwired into the firmware it completely dismisses what you set in your Power Options in the Windows 7 Control Panel. Why is this bad? Because if the HDD is inactive for more than eight seconds it needs to unpark its head, and that creates a very noticeable lag when launching applications or working with files because the process takes a few seconds to complete, not to mention it puts more stress on the HDD mechanics.

    Unless it's simply for a storage drive where you don't care about performance I recommend you go with Seagate, Hitachi, or Samsung for laptop HDDs instead.
    Reply
  • cadder 04 November 2011 01:16
    Current prices are a bit higher than what is mentioned in the article, actually pretty scary:

    Hitachi 750GB $140-160
    Samsung 1TB $220
    WD 750GB $160
    WD 1TB $230
    Reply
  • ewood 04 November 2011 02:16
    yeah prices are way off
    Reply
  • youssef 2010 04 November 2011 03:31
    I'd go with the WD Scorpio Black
    Reply