Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
To read about our monitor tests in-depth, please check out Display Testing Explained: How We Test PC Monitors. We cover brightness and contrast testing on page two.
Uncalibrated – Maximum Backlight Level
The C24G1A isn’t the brightest monitor out there, but it’s bright enough. That’s a statement I often make when testing monitors that top out lower than 300 nits, but it is honest. Run your desktop display at 300 nits and you will find yourself fatigued in a short time. If a screen can top 200 nits, it’s bright enough and the C24G1A does that easily. Note that the other inexpensive panel, the Philips 221V8LN is also below the 300-nit mark.
This puts the two budget VA panels at the top of the black level and contrast charts. That statistic is more important than peak output. Dynamic range is what makes an image more realistic with a three-dimensional look and more vivid and saturated color. This cannot be overstated.
After Calibration to 200 nits
Calibration adds a few points to the C24G1A’s and 221V8LN’s contrast score. A native ratio over 4,000:1 is higher than average among VA panels, regardless of price. And it’s well ahead of even the best IPS monitors. This is beyond impressive.
The Philips has one of the highest ANSI scores I’ve ever recorded and the C24G1A isn’t far afield. The only way you’ll see more depth and contrast with an OLED on your desk.
Test Takeaway: The C24G1A has more native contrast than almost every monitor I’ve ever tested. With fantastic black levels, it delivers a richly saturated image with detail and sharpness that belie its pixel density.
MORE: Best Gaming Monitors
MORE: How We Test PC Monitors
MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor
Current page: Brightness and ContrastPrev Page Response, Input Lag, Viewing Angles and Uniformity Next Page Grayscale, Gamma and Color
Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors.
i have the original C24G1 and love it. well worth the $160 i paid for it. this updated one currently $119 on amazon is a steal.Reply
thinking hard about ordering 2 of them to replace my mis-matched dual screens i have now.. :)
This is an insane monitor, I am tempted to buy two as well, as 1080p is still the gaming sweet spot unless you need extra visibility of an ultra wide.Reply
A VERY long time ago I learned that once you get a bigger monitor, you can NEVER go back. But I suppose not everyone agrees with that as I often see TINY screens in shops and what's more, in reviews like this one.Reply
But then, I also don't play games on my laptop, ever...while laptop gaming is totally a thing elsewhere...iieeeuw. I guess I'll just stick to being amazed at what people do and refrain from judging them. :)
I'm curious what the experience would be with a 165hz monitor for $120.00 from AOC. I bought into the 'cheap' monitor buys going with ViewSonic VX2418C ($130.00) and being humorously disappointed with the reality, I sorta laughed it off, "Oh well, you get what you pay for." Muddy details (even after adusting), game controller function knob broke and color for Display Port fritzed after 8 months (character flesh in games turned green. I RMA'd it two weeks ago. You can't adjust the hight, side to side and tilt but you buy it knowing that. Packaging was sort of suspect, small, minimum styrofoam, thin, unbleached corigated box, was least expensive packing I've seen for a monitor.Reply
Someone tell me they bought it and it's picturesque quality is pristine and refined. panel controls are easy to naviage and repsonds to shaders and is without washed color.