Asus ZenBook 13 (2020) Review: Ultraportable Value

Asus’ latest iteration of the ZenBook 13 brings Nvidia graphics and a cheeky second screen to the party.

Asus ZenBook 13 (2020)
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Asus ZenBook 13 strikes an attractive balance between size, price and power, while offering unique utility thanks to its discrete GPU, though its ScreenPad is only useful in specific situations.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Small form factor

  • +

    Comfortable keyboard

  • +

    Strong speakers

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Can’t upgrade without removing feet

  • -

    Dim screen

  • -

    Fingerprint magnet

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The Asus Zenbook 13 is appropriately named, as its feature-heavy build comes at a value that will put your mind- and your wallet- at ease. On the inside, the ZenBook 13’s 2020 refresh sets itself apart from other 10th Gen Intel ultraportables and some of the best ultrabooks by packing a discrete an Nvidia Geforce MX250 GPU into its slim, 2.7-pound frame, while still maintaining a lower price ($1,149) than similar offerings from Dell and Apple. Its CPU, the Intel Core i7-10510U, also offers the highest clock speed compared to its rivals (1.8-GHz base, 4.9GHz boost). Throw in a wide port selection and Asus’s ScreenPad -- a touchpad that doubles as full-color touch screen and you have a full feature set in a a small laptop.

Asus ZenBook 13 Specs

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

Michelle Ehrhardt is an editor at Tom's Hardware. She's been following tech since her family got a Gateway running Windows 95, and is now on her third custom-built system. Her work has been published in publications like Paste, The Atlantic, and Kill Screen, just to name a few. She also holds a master's degree in game design from NYU.

  • The.support.depot
    After my last horrendous experience with Asus support, I just cant see myself trusting them with thousands more of my hard earned dollars, I'm still angry and disappointed. It may be it's an Ok product, but in my case the speaker connector fell off the motherboard during a routine disassembly and reassembly for a battery test/replacement and it totally voided my warranty, and they would not see the disparity or logical flaws in their own policy. Any company, with a no exceptions policy, is hiding behind it, to cover deeper issues. Sorry Asus. We tried....My laptop was 6 months old, and had been in their hands 3 months of its life with rma's. True story bro....They still have it now.
    Reply
  • HSL
    Why would you under productivity performance section say:
    "To put that into perspective, the i7-10510U is a 4 core, 8 thread processor that performs at a base clock speed of 1.8 GHz and a max boost clock speed of 4.9 GHz. That’s higher than the Ryzen 7 4700U, which impressed us with its cost-to-performance ratio on the Acer Swift 3, though it also bears a higher price."

    This makes no difference whatsoever, the number is bigger. Show me where that actually translates into higher performance. It doesn't.
    Geekbench 3297 vs 4862 : AMD wins
    Handbrake 21:34 vs 11:00 : AMD wins
    R20 1200ish vs 2300ish : AMD wins

    These are landslide wins for AMD yet, the reader would probably think Intel would win for these based on the statement above. Also if this is such a comparable system why not include the performance results of the Ryzen 7 4700U?

    At a minimum you are being intentionally misleading or are ignorant of the facts. Either would disqualify you from reviewing samples like this.

    Why even bother talking about the Ryzen part if you are not going to include the results in the graphs?
    Reply