Athlon On The Fast Lane: Three Motherboards with nForce2-Chipset and Dual-Channel DDR

Test Setup

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Basic Hardware
Processor AMD Athlon XP 2800+ (2.25 GHz)
Main Memory 2x 256 MB PC3500 CL2, Corsair Micro
Hard Drive IBM DeskStar 60GXP, IC35040, 40 GB, 7.200 U/ Min, NTFS
Graphics Card Asus V8460, GeForce 4 TI4600, 128 MB
Common Hardware
Network Adapter 3COM 3C905-TX
Drivers & Settings
Graphics Driver Detonator 4 Series Version 30.82
Chipset Drivers nVIDIA driver 1.13
DirectX Version 8.1
Screen Resolution 1024x768x16, 85 HzSPECviewperf : 1280x1024x32, 85 Hz
Operating System Windows 2000 Professional SP3
Benchmarks
Quake III Arena Retail Version 1.16command line = +set cd_nocd 1 +set s_initsound 0Graphics detail set to ’Normal’Benchmark using ’Q3DEMO1’
Unreal Tournament 2003 Official Demo
Comanche 4 Official Demo
WinACE 2.20, best compression, Dictionary 4096 kB
SPECviewperf Version 7.0, all tests
mpeg4 encoding Xmpeg 4.5DivX 5.02 Pro (YV12)Compression/ quality : HighestData Rate : 780 kBitFormat : 720x576 Pixel@25 fps150 MB VOB file, no Audio
Sysmark 2002 Internet Content Creation
Lame MP3 Lame 3.91 MMX, SSE, SSE2, 3DNow !
PCMark 2002 Memory Bandwidth Benchmark
3DMark 2001SE Default Resolution : 1024x768x32

In order to compare the nForce2 boards’ performance to that of the KT400, we took the fastest KT400 motherboard currently available, an Asus A7V8X. You will find its benchmark results in each chart.

Benchmark Results

All benchmarks were performed with DDR333 memory at CL2, as this is the fastest configuration for nForce2. However, we also ran our benchmark suite at DDR400. The result is quite surprising, as there definitely are applications that benefit from DDR400.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware

In addition, we took the fastest board (Asus) and repeated the benchmark suite with only single-channel mode to find out what the real performance gap is between KT400 and nForce2 under the same conditions.

CPU Clock/ FSB Clock

As FSB overclocking within a range of 1-2 MHz can have tremendous impact on benchmark results, we regularly check if the manufacturers adhere to the specifications. Winning reviews by slightly overclocking the system means cheating the customer.

Interesting to see that all three companies stick exactly to the specifications. One reason for this is that the nForce2 chipset does not require an external clock generator.

Patrick Schmid
Editor-in-Chief (2005-2006)

Patrick Schmid was the editor-in-chief for Tom's Hardware from 2005 to 2006. He wrote numerous articles on a wide range of hardware topics, including storage, CPUs, and system builds.