Join for quick access. Enter your email below and we'll send confirmation plus sign you up to our newsletter.
By submitting your information, you confirm you are aged 16 or over,
have read our
Privacy Policy
and agree to the
Terms & Conditions. Geographical rules apply.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Nobody will be surprised if i845 plus PC133 won't be able to reach the scores of i850 plus RDRAM. The question however is, how much of a performance decrease we will actually see. Applications that rely on high memory bandwidth will suffer, while applications that require short latencies might not perform much worse than on i850.
I also threw my recent Tualatin-results into the equation to see if Pentium 4 plus i845 and PC133 SDRAM is still faster than Pentium III Tualatin. If the latter should not be the case it is very difficult to see a major sense behind the existence of i845/PC133.
Test Setup
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Pentium 4 i845 System
Motherboard
Not disclosed
Memory
256 MB Wichmann WorkX PC133 SDRAM 2-2-2-5/7
Pentium 4 System
Motherboard
Asus P4T, BIOS 1005 beta 1
Memory
256 MB Samsung PC800 RDRAM
Athlon 266 MHz FSB System
Motherboard
MSI K7 Master MS-6341, BIOS 1.1
Memory
256 MB Infineon PC2100 DDR SDRAM 8-8-5-2-2-2-2
Pentium III System
Motherboard
MSI 815 EPT Pro, BIOS rev. 1.0
Memory
256 MB PC150 SDRAM
Other System Components
Hard Drive
IBM DTLA-307030, 7200 RPM, ATA100
Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra, Driver 12.40
Operating Systems
Microsoft Windows 98 SEMicrosoft Windows 2000 Professional Service Pack 2
Screen Resolution
1024x768x16x851280x1024x32x85 for SPECviewperf 6.1.2
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.